JANNETTY RACING INDEPENDENT TESTING, ARH, ROTOFAB, MSD RESULTS - Page 5

JANNETTYRACING · 11-07-2016, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1

Exactly. Like I said I wanted the filter that made more hp. RF told me oiled made a couple more hp. I could even dig up the thread

Not sure how oiled would be better for daily. It likely filters worse than dry. Most oiled do. That's how they get more flow

I am sure it has something to do with the test procedures the very reason why we do this testing the right way to find the hard truth.

As far as I knew the dry filters were not readily available and I got one of the first ???

Quote:

Originally Posted by BowtieRocket

Its better for day to day because it filters more, not making more power...

Simply because Oiled filters will do a better job of trapping dirt.

JANNETTYRACING · 11-07-2016, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parish8

i could be wrong but you might want to ask around. my understanding is the stock fuel system probably wont go over 500rwhp on e85 and i thought the low side was the first to run out.

You will need one of our JMS fuel pump voltage boosters.

JANNETTYRACING · 11-07-2016, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1

Looks great.

Did you end up staying with the 2 inch? I though you planned on a cam in the future and they might work better. The difference when stock to a 1 7/8 is pretty small. I was surprised the 2 inch did not make more peak like it did on the ls3.

No sir, given the dyno testing we felt it in his best interest to stay with the 1 7/8 since they had an overall higher average power which will give him the best ET and MPH on the track.

Variable cams change how the engine will respond to headers the very reason why the LS3/L99 gains 28 RWHP and the LT-1 gains 15 RWHP.

We seen this many years ago when Ford introduced variable cams, the gains from Headers was almost cut in half from the Previous generation V8.

Ted.

Fraxum · 11-07-2016, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SS 1LE

Looks good! What are your ET goals now, 11.80's?

11.999

Fraxum · 11-07-2016, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1

Looks great.

Did you end up staying with the 2 inch? I though you planned on a cam in the future and they might work better. The difference when stock to a 1 7/8 is pretty small. I was surprised the 2 inch did not make more peak like it did on the ls3.

I was thinking the same as you. But in the end I trusted Ted to give what he thought the fastest setup was and best for me. He knows more about this than I do.

Red Jewel RS · 11-07-2016, 10:00 AM

Thanks Ted for your honest, straight forward approach to testing!

streetyme · 11-07-2016, 03:07 PM

Ted I will definitely keep you in mind when the time comes .. I check your web site quite regularly to see if you have LT-1 packages yet.. Looks like I'll keep the NPP for know too...

JANNETTYRACING · 11-07-2016, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by streetyme

Ted I will definitely keep you in mind when the time comes .. I check your web site quite regularly to see if you have LT-1 packages yet.. Looks like I'll keep the NPP for know too...

Our web site is under construction and giving us fits so please call any time we will be happy to put a power package together for you.

Thank you
Ted.

streetyme · 11-07-2016, 03:50 PM

Sounds like a plan.. For now just thinking about doing the dry Roto-Fab and the SCT with your 93 custom tune... How much tuning was required to run the MSD intake if your don't mind me asking?

JANNETTYRACING · 11-07-2016, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by streetyme

Sounds like a plan.. For now just thinking about doing the dry Roto-Fab and the SCT with your 93 custom tune... How much tuning was required to run the MSD intake if your don't mind me asking?

Great place to start.

A small amount of changes.

Thank you.

Ted.

KILLA BEE · 11-07-2016, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

I am sure it has something to do with the test procedures the very reason why we do this testing the right way to find the hard truth.

As far as I knew the dry filters were not readily available and I got one of the first ???

Simply because Oiled filters will do a better job of trapping dirt.

Thanks fellas he refused to listen to me

RideZX6R · 11-07-2016, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

You will need one of our JMS fuel pump voltage boosters.

Sounds like a KB boost-a-pump type deal?

ULTRAZLS1 · 11-07-2016, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLA BEE

Thanks fellas he refused to listen to me

You never explained why you just regurgitated what he said with no explanation. I was also told by rotofab the oiled produced more flow. Historically oiled is worse filtration as well. Sorry I didn't take your random comment as truth.

I have seen many airflow tests showing oiled filters doing a less effective job of fltering compared to dry. many of them. google it. This oiled filter must be more effective than some of the others.

http://www.nicoclub.com/archives/kn-vs-oem-filter.html

k&n oiled filter. The lowest filtration of any filter tested.

this isn't my first rodeo in automotive...

PRAY · 11-07-2016, 07:37 PM

I am being told the same thing about the oiled filter. Oiled flowing better makes sense to me but Teds test didn't show it. I didn't bring it with me for my dyno testing. I wholeheartedly believe in Teds procedures and I try to do as close to the same as possible but can't, so I went with what made power for him. Maybe next time to the track I will test both filters and let the g/cyl tell the story.

11-07-2016, 03:07 PM	#63
streetyme Drives: 2016 2SS nav mag ride npp a8 Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: St Louis Posts: 202	Ted I will definitely keep you in mind when the time comes .. I check your web site quite regularly to see if you have LT-1 packages yet.. Looks like I'll keep the NPP for know too... __________________ 2016 2SS A8 mag ride npp exhaust nav sunroof Rotofab CAI Borla Atak NPP Corsa X pipe BBS CHR Extreme Contactsport 2.9 Whipple Elite catch can Rotofab Juiced Motorsports installed by STG Motorsports JMS Fuel Maxx tuned by Gregs Tuning Operation Weld Laguna 17x10 18x5 2006 mustang gt Magnuson Livernois stage 2 heads stage 2 blower cams dynatech headers 4.10's Circle D convertor 533/511bs) (9.8lbs)

11-07-2016, 03:50 PM	#65
streetyme Drives: 2016 2SS nav mag ride npp a8 Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: St Louis Posts: 202	Sounds like a plan.. For now just thinking about doing the dry Roto-Fab and the SCT with your 93 custom tune... How much tuning was required to run the MSD intake if your don't mind me asking? __________________ 2016 2SS A8 mag ride npp exhaust nav sunroof Rotofab CAI Borla Atak NPP Corsa X pipe BBS CHR Extreme Contactsport 2.9 Whipple Elite catch can Rotofab Juiced Motorsports installed by STG Motorsports JMS Fuel Maxx tuned by Gregs Tuning Operation Weld Laguna 17x10 18x5 2006 mustang gt Magnuson Livernois stage 2 heads stage 2 blower cams dynatech headers 4.10's Circle D convertor 533/511bs) (9.8lbs)

11-07-2016, 07:37 PM	#70
PRAY Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Sanford NC Posts: 2,766	I am being told the same thing about the oiled filter. Oiled flowing better makes sense to me but Teds test didn't show it. I didn't bring it with me for my dyno testing. I wholeheartedly believe in Teds procedures and I try to do as close to the same as possible but can't, so I went with what made power for him. Maybe next time to the track I will test both filters and let the g/cyl tell the story. __________________ 2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said. Last edited by PRAY; 11-07-2016 at 08:01 PM.

11-07-2016, 10:00 AM	#62
Red Jewel RS Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Billings, MT Posts: 891 View My Garage	Thanks Ted for your honest, straight forward approach to testing!

User Name		Remember Me?
Password