Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2024, 02:00 PM   #1
wr00
 
Drives: 95' camaro
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 6
LT1 + Whipple fueling

Hi all,

I'm at a bit of a situation which I'm trying to find the best course of action. Currently I have a '16 2SS that has just been upgraded to:
Whipple 3.0L
TSP 1⅞" LT Headers
Roto-Fab CAI
MBRP Header-back exhaust (race profile)
Firecore wires

Originally, I was told the fuel system would be fine at 7-8 psi (3.750 pulley), but I am getting mixed results. Ultimately my plan is to run Katech port injection runners for the Whipple and potentially running the TooHighPsi reflex+ controller for added fuel. (Katech dual feed in tank). This was aimed at doing further mods down the road.

Currently, the car has the tune supplied by Whipple - it has been started, but not driven yet. Will the stock fuel system support the SC as is at lower boost levels (considering a conservative tune)? How are the supplied tunes? I am not planning on doing any racing or long WOT pulls until I get proper tuning and/or fuel system upgrades. The main point of getting the supplied tune in my case was to get it to a tuner without trailering.

Any insight would be appreciated.
wr00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 03:49 PM   #2
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by wr00 View Post
Hi all,

I'm at a bit of a situation which I'm trying to find the best course of action. Currently I have a '16 2SS that has just been upgraded to:
Whipple 3.0L
TSP 1⅞" LT Headers
Roto-Fab CAI
MBRP Header-back exhaust (race profile)
Firecore wires

Originally, I was told the fuel system would be fine at 7-8 psi (3.750 pulley), but I am getting mixed results. Ultimately my plan is to run Katech port injection runners for the Whipple and potentially running the TooHighPsi reflex+ controller for added fuel. (Katech dual feed in tank). This was aimed at doing further mods down the road.

Currently, the car has the tune supplied by Whipple - it has been started, but not driven yet. Will the stock fuel system support the SC as is at lower boost levels (considering a conservative tune)? How are the supplied tunes? I am not planning on doing any racing or long WOT pulls until I get proper tuning and/or fuel system upgrades. The main point of getting the supplied tune in my case was to get it to a tuner without trailering.

Any insight would be appreciated.
This has been covered pretty extensively here in the Forced Induction forum. Read some of KingLT1’s posts on fueling…very informative.

You’re on the right track, port injection is the way. For now, with 93 octane and at 7 psi you will max out the fuel system. The Whipple supplied tune will definitely leave power on the table but is fine for getting to a tuner. Or better yet, reach out to Megahurtz or KingLT1 on this board and get a remote tune.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 06:20 PM   #3
wr00
 
Drives: 95' camaro
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
This has been covered pretty extensively here in the Forced Induction forum. Read some of KingLT1’s posts on fueling…very informative.

You’re on the right track, port injection is the way. For now, with 93 octane and at 7 psi you will max out the fuel system. The Whipple supplied tune will definitely leave power on the table but is fine for getting to a tuner. Or better yet, reach out to Megahurtz or KingLT1 on this board and get a remote tune.
Thanks for the information!

I did do some searching on the topic and found roughly what the stock fuel system can support, I'm just unsure roughly what my combination is going to make (hp or psi - heard 6-10 psi, while the mfg claims 7-8).

I'll dig into the mention posts - thanks again.
wr00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 06:22 PM   #4
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,814
I would do a 4" upper pulley if you plan to run the stock fuel system for a awhile. A 3.75 upper /7" lower pulley with a Whipple 3.0 would be comparable to my 2.9 running a 3.25 / 7.0 far as boost and I make 10-11psi. Mine also made 7.5-8psi on a 3.5 pulley. I think that will be too much boost for the stock fuel system, and even if you had enough fuel it will be octane limited on 93.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 07:48 PM   #5
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
I would do a 4" upper pulley if you plan to run the stock fuel system for a awhile.
That’s not a bad idea! Better to keep the boost very conservative until the fueling is properly addressed.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.