06-24-2020, 11:57 AM | #57 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro V6/RS Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 1,596
|
Do you think it's mainly the TB or more how GM tunes these cars? I do see quite often where it's mentioned how crappy the Camaro TB is, but I wonder if it's actually similar in the Mustang and Challenger as well, only they have a more aggressive calibration. Know what I mean?
|
06-24-2020, 12:23 PM | #58 | |
Drives: SS A8, NPP, Red Hot Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
Last edited by RyanR623; 06-24-2020 at 12:36 PM. |
|
06-24-2020, 01:39 PM | #59 | |
Drives: 2018 Camaro V6/RS Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 1,596
|
Quote:
|
|
06-24-2020, 01:46 PM | #60 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
|
throttle body updates if they're doing what they should do, only really impact wot. Since the car commands torque and any change you make to how much torque a certain tb position allows based on the gear / pedal / etc ...will get learned and compensated for over time.
They tend not to do what they should do though and allow too much air for the "closed/0% throttle" states or the fuel pump can't provide enough fuel for the air coming in and that's what will throw codes. Only ecu/trans tuning can deal with the light throttle hesitation you get at low speeds/stop->go fully. I too prefer to stay away from throttle controllers due to quality concerns. But technically, they can't do anything you can't do yourself. It's hard to say anything about the car - performance wise - is crappy considering the numbers it puts down stock and how it competes with other cars. getting a 3000+lb car to 60 in mid 5 seconds without FI while that same car can get mid to high 30mpg highway at 80mph and it can handle turns is just simply beyond what was possible 20 years ago. The bar for "crappy" would have to be so high that it isn't really even relevant. It's not like the roads and what you're allowed to do on them have increased along with car performance. If anything, they've only gotten worse due to congestion and more traffic cops. Last edited by cellsafemode; 06-24-2020 at 01:57 PM. |
06-24-2020, 02:15 PM | #61 |
Drives: SS A8, NPP, Red Hot Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 583
|
Fair enough, that plus the code issues and it sounds like you'll just stick with the throttle body lol. You'll be happy with it. Best part is, mamo and soler offer a money back guarantee, but you don't hear of anyone returning them...
|
06-24-2020, 02:51 PM | #62 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
|
Quote:
If you count the actual people responding on the solar thread at least, you can count the number of people who actually purchased on one hand and about half had poor performance (either codes thrown or just rough idling/ bouncy throttle /worse performance). The money back guarantee is nice but just because you're not hearing people using it, doesn't mean they aren't. I mean it wouldn't make sense that those people who had problems are just living with them, but you dont hear about them having gotten corrected either. |
|
06-24-2020, 02:57 PM | #63 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro V6/RS Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 1,596
|
Yep absolutely, their money back guarantee sounds pretty solid too. No hassels, stipulations, etc...
|
06-24-2020, 03:01 PM | #64 | |
Drives: 2018 Camaro V6/RS Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 1,596
|
Quote:
I just got done reading all the Soler threads on here, and from what I'm seeing is not nearly that many cars having issues. Maybe like 10% at best, and a good majority of those issues appear to be due to user error. That's just what I'm seeing. Plus it looks like Soler is bending over backwards to make it right, however it needs to be. |
|
06-24-2020, 03:12 PM | #65 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
|
Quote:
I didn't see any other threads regarding the lgx tb for them. BOYD3800SII - happy ekone - negative - rough idle RxSummit16 - happy - maybe negative bouncy throttle Jvert18 - negative - threw codes SoarinSnek - says they ordered but no response about installing |
|
06-24-2020, 03:20 PM | #66 | |
Drives: 2018 Camaro V6/RS Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 1,596
|
Quote:
|
|
06-24-2020, 05:36 PM | #67 | |
Drives: 2020 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: NC
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
I got like two camaro stuff I might sell cuz I'm not using them anymore, wanna keep the car stock and as valuable as possible. |
|
06-26-2020, 08:42 PM | #68 |
Drives: 2015 Corvette Stingray Join Date: May 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 386
|
Guys, no business with a money-back warranty can run at 10% RMA, let alone 60%. Without money-back, a business could run for a couple of months, and then they'll be gone.
These days, with the transparency of social media platforms, everything comes to light. The best businesses and products out there with a statistically significant number of reviews always get between 5-15% bad reviews. But that is just the percent of bad reviews, which doesn't correspond (it is much higher) with the percent of actual quality scapes/issues out of all the units sold. Why? Because, negative experiences are usually reported 100%, while positive experiences get shared only sometimes. It's human nature. If all the positives experiences were expressed we should have thousands of good reviews adding all the forums we support. But there might be only a couple of hundreds that posted. Anyway, don't let that stop you or scare you guys, here is a statistic with 100% certainty. We have zero customers that weren't made whole, they either kept the TB b/c they liked it or had very penny back, including shipping. |
06-26-2020, 09:30 PM | #69 | |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,602
|
Quote:
As to what Mike said above, I'm one of their happy V8 customers, and the guy is old school in the best possible sense, putting customer satisfaction above all else. Soler is a "good old days" kind of business with a product that, at least in my case, fully delivered on its promise. I don't know about their LGX throttle body, but considering the research and the effort across the board, I'd be very surprised if it were "snake oil" or a flawed design. Just my 2 cents'.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune 1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18 3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18 3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18 4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18 4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18 5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18 |
|
06-27-2020, 03:21 PM | #70 | |
Drives: 2020 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: NC
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|