[iPODFAN11]

Originally Posted by AN0NYM0US

Found one yesterday guys, it’s even uglier in person

Funny...the flowtie looks like it isn't there? I don't see any indentation in the center bar, just camo.

[hitmix300]

i like the car from a birds eye view but not from ground level.... dang chevy, i'll stick with my 2016.

[TrackClub]

Originally Posted by iPODFAN11

Funny...the flowtie looks like it isn't there? I don't see any indentation in the center bar, just camo.

Seems the guy that posted the pic apparenty wears special eye wear capable of seeing thru camo.

Please:

[TrackClub]

Originally Posted by AN0NYM0US

Found one yesterday guys, it’s even uglier in person

It seems youve been bashing Camaro on this forum while advertising a dying breed of Dodge for 2 yrs now.
I hope you at least get some payroll money from them for all your efforts.

[AN0NYM0US]

Originally Posted by TrackClub

It seems youve been bashing Camaro on this forum while advertising a dying breed of Dodge for 2 yrs now.
I hope you at least get some payroll money from them for all your efforts.

lol I haven’t been on this forum for 2+ years till this refresh.....”advertising?” Lmaoo what? I barely ever mentioned dodge.

[samurai]

I like the hood on the red camo one, the power domes look good.

[RenegadeXR]

Originally Posted by iPODFAN11

Funny...the flowtie looks like it isn't there? I don't see any indentation in the center bar, just camo.

Well, the camo is specifically designed to make it extremely hard to visually discern any body lines. I would say it's very possible there's an indentation but you'd never see it.

But I think this leads to another point as well: If the Flowtie in the center of the bumper was supposedly to add a tiny bit of extra airflow to compensate for other changes in the design, how the heck did all of the test mules run this entire time with it totally covered up? I guess it could be a breathable material. I have some level of doubt as to how critical it really is.

[TrackClub]

Originally Posted by AN0NYM0US

lol I haven’t been on this forum for 2+ years till this refresh.....”advertising?” Lmaoo what? I barely ever mentioned dodge.

Youve been on this forum since 2015 and youve been very good promoting Dodge while finding issues with Chevy. This makes you a troll. Go away.

[gpskinzhut]

I think it's gonna grow on me after seeing it for awhile. Some paint on the bumper and it's not too bad. I have to see one in the flesh. I don't know if I'll ever like the tails though. Just seems... off. Digging the hood a bit. Want to see how some aero works with it. Even the '16-'18 is a bit dull without any.

[MuhThugga]

Originally Posted by TrackClub

I think interior space is great as it is. It is a sport car not a family hauler afterall.
They need to reduce weight vs increase it. Plus an average number of occupants per vehicle is 1.55 statistically. Regardless of vehicle type, including big honking trucks and 7 seat suvs...

The interior space is absolutely atrocious. The trunk space is laughable.

You can rattle off statistics all you want, but if someone is shopping for their new daily driver and wants a muscle car, trunk space and rear seat room become a determining factor. It doesn't matter if the average number of occupants is 1.55 people. What matters is that the car can actually seat four people comfortably when the need pops up.

[triggerjerk]

The simple fix is for GM to build all 2019s with the RS facia.
No worries about molds, testing etc.
Anything but that SS snout.

[ISHLISS]

Originally Posted by triggerjerk

The simple fix is for GM to build all 2019s with the RS facia.
No worries about molds, testing etc.
Anything but that SS snout.

I agree, I actually think the RS fascia looks quite good.

[guitarman8373]

Originally Posted by Nicul15

It’s true if you need the room get the challenger. If they’re all the same size we lose variety

Exactly.

[TrackClub]

Originally Posted by MuhThugga

The interior space is absolutely atrocious. The trunk space is laughable.

You can rattle off statistics all you want, but if someone is shopping for their new daily driver and wants a muscle car, trunk space and rear seat room become a determining factor. It doesn't matter if the average number of occupants is 1.55 people. What matters is that the car can actually seat four people comfortably when the need pops up.

When and if a need pops up you can seat 4 ppl. I have done it. Is it as comfy as a 4 door sedan? Nope. Is it desiged to carry 4 folks as a true dd car? Nope. Never was either. Even 30+ yrs ago when i bought my first one.

The trunk and rear seats can accommodate 4 tires for track. Thats tons of space. But ya if somebody wants a muscle car as the only car and they have a family better choices are available. Just like i wouldnt suggest anyone buys a 911 as a family car. Or a Miata. Etc.