Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


View Poll Results: diesel or gas
diesel 8 25.81%
gas 23 74.19%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2023, 06:53 AM   #15
bootss
 
Drives: 2021 ZL1 1LE with PDR
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by ember1205 View Post
With the price of diesel being sky high in so many places, and knowing how well the 6.2 does economy-wise, why wouldn't you go with the 6.2 gas engine in the truck?
The 6.2 doesn't have a significant towing advantage over the 5.3, and it's heavier so you have a lower tongue weight. Either way, if you're looking to push numbers at the top end, you're likely going to need a 2500. I wouldn't tow anything over 10K# with a 1500 on the regular.

The 6.2 is a beats of a motor, but the 1500 is maxed out in other areas at those extreme weights.


Edit to say. The 6.2 also requires premium fuel, or it runs all retarded.
bootss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:11 AM   #16
ember1205
Hot Camaro
 
ember1205's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 2SS Convertible 6MT
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CT
Posts: 3,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by bootss View Post
The 6.2 doesn't have a significant towing advantage over the 5.3, and it's heavier so you have a lower tongue weight. Either way, if you're looking to push numbers at the top end, you're likely going to need a 2500. I wouldn't tow anything over 10K# with a 1500 on the regular.

The 6.2 is a beats of a motor, but the 1500 is maxed out in other areas at those extreme weights.


Edit to say. The 6.2 also requires premium fuel, or it runs all retarded.
The additional torque of the 6.2 makes the motor not need to "work as hard" as the 5.3 does in most scenarios. Yes, it requires premium fuel, but when you look at the total cost of ownership of the truck combined with the overall capabilities, it's one of those "upgrades" that likely ends up worth it in the long run because it enhances just about every driveability aspect of the truck.

Is a 2500 a better tow vehicle? Yes. Is it worth buying a 2500 versus a 1500? For the general consumer, almost always no. The additional expense of the larger truck is far more than what you would spend in extra gas or even paying to have those large loads transported for you based on the very low amount of miles most people tow for compared to when they don't tow.

I've been looking to replace my truck with a new one and won't even bother going to the dealerships because no one is stocking the 6.2L motor-based trucks around here and I'm not interested in placing an order and waiting.
ember1205 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:17 AM   #17
Devstrike
 
Devstrike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 Camaro LT1
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 542
Had a buddy looking at 2500 GM 6.6 gas. He built a 1500 and a 2500 Silverado online and interesting enough the 2500 gas truck with what he wanted was cheaper than the 1500 he was looking at. He built an LT which I believe is the middle trim for the HDs.
Devstrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:21 AM   #18
laynlo15
 
laynlo15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silveradoss573 View Post
None of the above. Gm still has issues with rockers failing on both the 5.3 and 6.2 engines. And new Duramax owners are reporting excessive oil consumption already. It's evidently so bad that gm is actually overfilling the 3.0 Duramax now from the factory by 1 qt so new truck owners don't run low before their first oil change.
I've got 12000 miles on mine and never had any excessive or any additional oil loss, had no issues with mine whatsoever. Love it.
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:26 AM   #19
302crossram

 
302crossram's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Sharkskin 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: NWFL
Posts: 758
Name:  pulsarlt_moduleharness.png
Views: 329
Size:  43.8 KB
302crossram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:28 AM   #20
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,789
For towing I would go 2500HD custom with a 6.6 L8T. You can get them new for around 50k.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:40 AM   #21
MisterMarauder
 
MisterMarauder's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Radiant Red ZL1
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: US
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silveradoss573 View Post
None of the above. Gm still has issues with rockers failing on both the 5.3 and 6.2 engines. And new Duramax owners are reporting excessive oil consumption already. It's evidently so bad that gm is actually overfilling the 3.0 Duramax now from the factory by 1 qt so new truck owners don't run low before their first oil change.
The primary issue with rockers/lifters on these small block engines is the AFM causing failures. You can buy an AFM disabler that plugs right into the OBD that solves the problem.

https://www.rangetechnology.com/prod...-dfm_disabler/
__________________


Current
2023 Radiant Red ZL1
1992 Z28

Previous
2018 2SS Redline Edition
1992 RS
MisterMarauder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 07:41 AM   #22
Devstrike
 
Devstrike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 Camaro LT1
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
For towing I would go 2500HD custom with a 6.6 L8T. You can get them new for around 50k.
Added bonus the 2500 6.6L gas from what I read doesn't have DFM like the 1500s do.
Devstrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 08:01 AM   #23
ember1205
Hot Camaro
 
ember1205's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 2SS Convertible 6MT
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CT
Posts: 3,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devstrike View Post
Added bonus the 2500 6.6L gas from what I read doesn't have DFM like the 1500s do.
I thought I had seen where the 5.3L had AFM/DFM and the larger gas engines had "Stop/Start". No?
ember1205 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 08:04 AM   #24
Devstrike
 
Devstrike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 Camaro LT1
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by ember1205 View Post
I thought I had seen where the 5.3L had AFM/DFM and the larger gas engines had "Stop/Start". No?

HD Gas engines like the 6.6 don't need to meet certain standards that 1500 trucks do. Which is why the Fuel economy ratings on 2500 trucks say NA for city and hwy mpgs on the window sticker. So they do not have DFM or start stop which in turn makes them more reliable.
Devstrike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 08:06 AM   #25
Jus Cruisin
Old Gearhead
 
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Sierra Denali Ultimate
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MI
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silveradoss573 View Post
None of the above. Gm still has issues with rockers failing on both the 5.3 and 6.2 engines. And new Duramax owners are reporting excessive oil consumption already. It's evidently so bad that gm is actually overfilling the 3.0 Duramax now from the factory by 1 qt so new truck owners don't run low before their first oil change.
There are literally millions on the roads between GMC, Chevy and Cadillac. It's a really small percentage of the total engines on the road. Just like the 3.5l Ecoboost intercooler uproar. Yep, some had issues but very few in the total production but because of the noisy victims, you'd of thought it was a certainty. A vast majority, like me, never had any problems.
I just bought the 6.2l and not losing a second of sleep "worrying".
__________________
2023 Camaro ZL1 convertible - black - SOLD
2023 GMC Sierra Denali Ultimate - black
Jus Cruisin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 08:10 AM   #26
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/22 Colorado TB/69 Chevelle
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 4,968
If you don't mind the cost of diesel, go for the duramax.

This is how I present the comparison for folks shopping the 5.3L vs the 3.0L. If you're buying a duramax thinking that you'll save money, remember that diesel is almost $2 more per gallon than regular unleaded. You might not be saving any money at all. You'll get better highway fuel economy and you'll have more torque for towing but the added cost of fuel might be a wash or end up costing more in the long run.

If you're shopping the 6.2L vs the 3.0L, get the 3.0L because premium unleaded is closer to diesel in cost per gallon and the fuel economy difference will make the 3.0L come out ahead in the long run.

If the 3.0L was available in the ZR2, I would have bought it over the 6.2L. I will also add that the 3.0L is overall more reliable than either of the V8s.

That said, I think the best overall powertrain that GM has right now in terms power, fuel economy and reliability is the 2.7L HO.
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 08:12 AM   #27
rst08tierney
Account Suspended
 
Drives: '23 2SS Rapid Blue
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: CA
Posts: 202
I have the 22 Refreshed RST Rally Sport Edition. 5.3L. Wanted something a bit sporty with out that lowered lookl.

Zero Problems towing a 22Ft boat.

Only mods are ditching the stock tires (22's on the RS) and grabbed some hybrid ridge grapplers and leveled the front end.

Highly disappointed in the leather quality and would love to choke out the engineer who decided to put the spedo on the left side. What an idiot. Hopefully a future software update allows you to flip it.

As for gas mileage im lucky to get 16 around town and 20 on the highway. I've been getting more like 13 / 17 but nothing beats the storage and capability of a truck for daily life.
Attached Images
  
rst08tierney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2023, 08:19 AM   #28
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/22 Colorado TB/69 Chevelle
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 4,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jus Cruisin View Post
There are literally millions on the roads between GMC, Chevy and Cadillac. It's a really small percentage of the total engines on the road. Just like the 3.5l Ecoboost intercooler uproar. Yep, some had issues but very few in the total production but because of the noisy victims, you'd of thought it was a certainty. A vast majority, like me, never had any problems.
I just bought the 6.2l and not losing a second of sleep "worrying".
The V8 issues are real and they are definitely worse than ever before. There are over 2k 6.2L engines on backorder right now for GM service departments across the country. These are all warranty replacement engines too. That doesn't include the replacements that are customer pay. The wait time for a new engine is at 6-12 months.

Can you imagine buying a $75k ZR2 or Denali and having the engine blow up at less than 8k miles and then having to wait up to a year for a replacement? It sucks and it's a reality for a lot of owners right now. The first ZR2 we sold 8 months ago is sitting out back with a blown engine at 7k miles right now. No idea when GM can get a replacement either.

I've seen enough of them here that it's definitely on my mind with my truck.
Attached Images
 
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.