01-27-2023, 04:50 PM | #1 |
Drives: C7 Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: MN
Posts: 12
|
416 E85 NA Build questions
Are LT1 injectors sufficient for a 600whp NA E85 416 stroker, 6800-7000 max RPM?
I know they flow enough for 550whp 6.2 NA E85. The cam will have +32% fuel lobe. If LT4 injectors are needed, is the vehicle drivable without a tune? I’m wondering how to properly break it in and seat the rings before driving it to the tuner. What compression ratio are you guys running with E85 and only occasional 92 gas? Any experiences you’d like to share with the different 416 stroker kits, brands, piston brands, rods, cranks, build issues, etc… is welcome. This is a DD C7 M7, autoX occasionally. Thanks Last edited by BMEP; 01-27-2023 at 04:52 PM. Reason: Punctuation |
01-27-2023, 06:23 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,799
|
Should be ok...no you never run an engine with different injectors without adjusting the injector flow rate table in the ECU.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
01-27-2023, 08:07 PM | #3 |
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85 Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
|
I usually run my ~12.95:1 on E85 probably 99% of the time. I have run it on 93 before and in most situations, it seems ok, but I never really logged it to see how much knock retard there was on 93. With the TC locked at low rpms while going up hills on 93 though it will start knocking where you can hear it in the car. Does fine 100% of the time on E85 which is around 65-75% around here.
|
01-28-2023, 01:11 AM | #4 | |
Drives: 2019 Camaro Z-28 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,484
|
Quote:
Here below is a general list on my 416 MISC info on Engine Replacement The following parts were used on the NEW 416 engine install. I mention this because these parts can be expensive and you need to account for these should you ever go this route yourself. NEW GM Oil Pan (Original pan was damaged) NEW GM LT4 Oil Pump (NEVER reuse an oil pump on a failed engine) ARP Head Studs (not required but advisable for 14:1 compression) LT4 Head Gaskets NEW GM LS7 Lifters Chromoly Push Rods NEW Front Seal NEW Crank Bolt NEW Cam Retainer Plate NEW Timing Chain CAM Phaser AMS Break in OIL OIL FILTER NGK TR6IX plugs LT4 Fuel Injectors LT4 Fuel Pump Below is a more specific set of soecs that LME provided
__________________
__________________________________________
2019 SS 1LE BIG NA A10 Eagles Canyon Raceway 2.7 CCW Below https://youtu.be/c9M5UHDftcA 4-15-23 at SCCA TT U1 Class MEGA Thread on THIS car: https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=602092 Retired Cars BELOW: 1973 Camaro, 1969 Camaro, 1969 Camaro SS RS 2010 Camaro SS with 1000HP F1R, 2019 ZL1 1LE A10 Last edited by sr71bb; 01-28-2023 at 01:31 AM. |
|
02-03-2023, 06:21 PM | #5 |
Drives: C7 Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: MN
Posts: 12
|
Thank-you all for that information.
SR71bb, what are your cam specs? Any dyno or 1/4 mile results? It must be 700+ bhp depending on cam. That must fun street car. I’m thinking about the new 6.6L truck crank with 3.860” stroke as an option. Could fit long 6.200 rods with 1.105 compression height pistons (same as used in 415 4” stroke) for a 9.235 deck. 9.240 is nominal deck height. Gives a better rod/stroke ratio and piston skirts stay in the cyl at BDC, but lose 12 cubic inches, 0.2L. Decisions… |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|