Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2023, 02:06 PM   #15
ZL1Atlanta
 
ZL1Atlanta's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
How do you feel about running without an air filter? The dragonflies in Georgia can be huge!
It is definitely a drag strip only setup, but I do have a filter if I want to drive it on the street. Haven’t seen any indication that it has inhaled any flying creatures yet. Lol
__________________
2017 ZL1 - PB 8.05 @ 172 MPH @ 3730 lbs @ 70 DA (work in progress)

Built by Vengeance Racing, tuned by Elite Tuned
ZL1Atlanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 02:20 PM   #16
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL1Atlanta View Post
It is definitely a drag strip only setup, but I do have a filter if I want to drive it on the street. Haven’t seen any indication that it has inhaled any flying creatures yet. Lol
Which filter?
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 02:27 PM   #17
ZL1Atlanta
 
ZL1Atlanta's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
Which filter?
Just a regular green filter that goes in place of the bellmouth. I don’t recall the brand. It was actually on when the car ran the 8.20.
Attached Images
 
__________________
2017 ZL1 - PB 8.05 @ 172 MPH @ 3730 lbs @ 70 DA (work in progress)

Built by Vengeance Racing, tuned by Elite Tuned
ZL1Atlanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 02:45 PM   #18
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL1Atlanta View Post
Just a regular green filter that goes in place of the bellmouth. I don’t recall the brand. It was actually on when the car ran the 8.20.
You mention density altitude of 3300 ft, how much ET improvement do you think your car would see if it was at zero feet rather than 3300 ft
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 02:55 PM   #19
ZL1Atlanta
 
ZL1Atlanta's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
You mention density altitude of 3300 ft, how much ET improvement do you think your car would see if it was at zero feet rather than 3300 ft
Well the 8.20 @ 173 PB was ran in a little over 1k DA. The same setup was at an event a couple weeks prior with ~3300 DA and it ran 8.38 at 170. The 8.20 was literally off the trailer with no ice because it was a shake down pass, but then had an issue that required stopping for the day. Between having the filter off, putting different pulley’s on, and a couple other things, it should run 8.0x - 8.1x even in 3k DA. We just keep finding the next weak part or part getting tired.
__________________
2017 ZL1 - PB 8.05 @ 172 MPH @ 3730 lbs @ 70 DA (work in progress)

Built by Vengeance Racing, tuned by Elite Tuned
ZL1Atlanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 03:00 PM   #20
Supercharged!
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Michigan
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
At power levels that typically go hand-in-hand with Big Gulp installations, the airflow is much more important than IATs are. That air is compressed and is significantly hotter leaving the rotor pack (Boyle’s Gas Law), then goes through an air-to-water intercooler which removes a large amount of temperature, probably 60-80 degrees or more (maybe TooHighPSI will chime in with his experience). Five or ten degrees on the IAT inlet is trivial. The much bigger issue is the lack of airflow to the filter area at big horsepower levels. I actually removed the BG insulation strips from mine and gained nearly a full MPH on back to back runs at the strip. I’ll be coming up with something to get serious airflow to the filter this winter…the BG setup is a hold up at my power level. Again, at 700-800 WHP it’s not a problem, but as you approach and exceed 1K WHP, the BG needs help. Just my humble opinion of course.
For positive displacement superchargers:

It’s all about mass airflow… Pressure & Temperature. The important part is ensuring the air can get in the supercharger. i.e. how close to atmospheric pressure and temperature is the inlet of the supercharger. Then you look at the volumetric efficiency of the supercharger, supercharger speed, supercharger displacement and air density.. this will tell the mass airflow into the engine. These are the only variables that will affect airflow into the engine

Once the air is in the supercharger, it will go in the engine. intercooler or not. Then the intercooler is there to do two things, reduce the pressure and have the air cool enough to not cause suboptimal spark timing. At a high level, it won’t increase your airflow (unless you end up at a better part of the volumetric efficiency map due to lower pressure)

It is really quite easy to build an excel table that will allow you to calculate how much impact the inlet restrictions or hot IAT will have.
Supercharged! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 03:40 PM   #21
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged! View Post
For positive displacement superchargers:

It’s all about mass airflow… Pressure & Temperature. The important part is ensuring the air can get in the supercharger. i.e. how close to atmospheric pressure and temperature is the inlet of the supercharger. Then you look at the volumetric efficiency of the supercharger, supercharger speed, supercharger displacement and air density.. this will tell the mass airflow into the engine. These are the only variables that will affect airflow into the engine

Once the air is in the supercharger, it will go in the engine. intercooler or not. Then the intercooler is there to do two things, reduce the pressure and have the air cool enough to not cause suboptimal spark timing. At a high level, it won’t increase your airflow (unless you end up at a better part of the volumetric efficiency map due to lower pressure)

It is really quite easy to build an excel table that will allow you to calculate how much impact the inlet restrictions or hot IAT will have.
In the first sentence of this thread, I said that my efforts are to direct more cooler air to the throttle body, which is essentially what you said. I'm just trying to get the most out of this particular setup. I don't believe that it currently gets all the air that's available or that it needs, thus this project
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 04:07 PM   #22
Supercharged!
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Michigan
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
In the first sentence of this thread, I said that my efforts are to direct more cooler air to the throttle body, which is essentially what you said. I'm just trying to get the most out of this particular setup. I don't believe that it currently gets all the air that's available or that it needs, thus this project
Agreed, focusing on that aspect is well worth the effort. Maximizing the air that is available is by far the most efficient route.
Supercharged! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 04:10 PM   #23
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2021 Red Hot ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gapplebees
Posts: 3,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
In the first sentence of this thread, I said that my efforts are to direct more cooler air to the throttle body, which is essentially what you said. I'm just trying to get the most out of this particular setup. I don't believe that it currently gets all the air that's available or that it needs, thus this project
What your missing though is that Jason is already running a 1200-1300whp setup and he's just running an open element filter on the street and a bellmouth for the track. No fancy cold air/ram air setups. It's certainly fine if you want to pursue it as a project, I understand its fun to have projects, but I just don't see you getting anything out of it as long as you can already provide your engine enough air.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2023, 05:53 PM   #24
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL1Atlanta View Post
Well the 8.20 @ 173 PB was ran in a little over 1k DA. The same setup was at an event a couple weeks prior with ~3300 DA and it ran 8.38 at 170.
That's .18 over 2300 ft., so that setup should run 8.10-8.11 at 0 ft. Using your .18 improvements over 2300 ft., my 9.61 would improve .54 theoretically, to 9.07, while I've been thinking 9.15. I've still got a ways to go to 8.9x. There's still more Jenny Craig I could do.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2023, 12:03 PM   #25
ZL1Atlanta
 
ZL1Atlanta's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
That's .18 over 2300 ft., so that setup should run 8.10-8.11 at 0 ft. Using your .18 improvements over 2300 ft., my 9.61 would improve .54 theoretically, to 9.07, while I've been thinking 9.15. I've still got a ways to go to 8.9x. There's still more Jenny Craig I could do.
What I've found is that nothing scales quite that linearly, but on paper it makes sense. You know how it is - better air equals more power and too many times more power equals more problems.

That new intake I referenced, while enabling more air into the blower, it also started forcing my TB closed. It already has the latest upgraded motor in it so Nick Williams sent us some new stuff try.
__________________
2017 ZL1 - PB 8.05 @ 172 MPH @ 3730 lbs @ 70 DA (work in progress)

Built by Vengeance Racing, tuned by Elite Tuned
ZL1Atlanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2023, 12:06 PM   #26
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL1Atlanta View Post
What I've found is that nothing scales quite that linearly, but on paper it makes sense. You know how it is - better air equals more power and too many times more power equals more problems.

That new intake I referenced, while enabling more air into the blower, it also started forcing my TB closed. It already has the latest upgraded motor in it so Nick Williams sent us some new stuff try.
And I assume you had to change your tune when you put on the velocity stack versus using a conventional filter?
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2023, 12:16 PM   #27
ZL1Atlanta
 
ZL1Atlanta's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
And I assume you had to change your tune when you put on the velocity stack versus using a conventional filter?
The new intake did need a new tune. The one in the picture was able to run with filter on or off with the current engine. My old engine needed a separate tune for filter and velocity stack. Part of the challenge there is the 120mm TB.
__________________
2017 ZL1 - PB 8.05 @ 172 MPH @ 3730 lbs @ 70 DA (work in progress)

Built by Vengeance Racing, tuned by Elite Tuned
ZL1Atlanta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2023, 01:05 PM   #28
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL1Atlanta View Post
The new intake did need a new tune. The one in the picture was able to run with filter on or off with the current engine. My old engine needed a separate tune for filter and velocity stack. Part of the challenge there is the 120mm TB.
I can imagine. Just getting from the 6-in big gulp to the 4.4 in throttle body on my engine wasn't easy
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.