Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2023, 09:05 AM   #99
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
Yeah, I didn't know the figures were that large, but the difference was immediately obvious when I turned on the pump. Thanks for posting the diagram.


FYI at 12 PSI of pump differential, that CWA400 flow performance looks to be spot on what the Stewart EMP pump does. Looks like a great selection.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2023, 05:05 PM   #100
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
the tubing, even if it’s a bit undersized.
Regarding undersized lines, why can't I just come off the tank outlet nipple with a -16 braided steel hose and clamp, or do I have to do a -16 double swivel and hose? here https://hpsperformanceproducts.com/p...43964156969212
Attached Images
 
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2023, 05:37 PM   #101
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,758
If the tank is a male NPT fitting I would not clamp a hose onto that. Use the swivel fitting and go from NPT on the tank to the appropriate hose connection. Likewise if your tank output is AN, same thing, just go from AN to the hose fitting. But a swivel will let you tighten the fitting up to the tank without twisting the hose.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2023, 06:30 PM   #102
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
If the tank is a male NPT fitting I would not clamp a hose onto that. Use the swivel fitting and go from NPT on the tank to the appropriate hose connection. Likewise if your tank output is AN, same thing, just go from AN to the hose fitting. But a swivel will let you tighten the fitting up to the tank without twisting the hose.
I can use a rubber hose right?
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2023, 07:38 PM   #103
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
I can use a rubber hose right?
Yes. So with rubber hose (like heater core hose) then simply get an NPT-to-hose barb fitting (again assuming you have NPT connections at the tank). Put some appropriate hose clamps on you’re ready to go.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2023, 03:35 PM   #104
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
So, this project - Pierburg, header wrap, underhood water line insul., and better tank fittings is all about getting lower blower, engine, and water temps. Here's a pretty good comparison, but it never pulls any advance, or misfires, etc.

The first data is pre-mods, and the second is post-mods. I have a few more lines to insulate.
Attached Images
 
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.

Last edited by JSH; 08-29-2023 at 04:57 PM.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2023, 12:15 PM   #105
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
I've wrapped all water lines, including the engine coolant line, with DEI 3000 and now have my eye on the intake, TB, and SC inlet area. I've laid a piece of DEI 3000 on it simply as a placeholder. Has anyone seen a car with these areas insulated?
Attached Images
 
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.

Last edited by JSH; 09-03-2023 at 12:49 PM.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2023, 07:11 PM   #106
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
I've wrapped all water lines, including the engine coolant line, with DEI 3000 and now have my eye on the intake, TB, and SC inlet area. I've laid a piece of DEI 3000 on it simply as a placeholder. Has anyone seen a car with these areas insulated?
You might be reaching at items of diminishing returns in my humble opinion. Insulating the TB, intake, and inlet areas might actually make them heat soak worse since the 500 pound chunk of hot aluminum (your engine lol) attached to them will conduct heat to them that they will no longer be able to shed since they’re insulated. The small change in pre-blower IAT will have zero impact on post blower IATs which is what really matters. It would take a pretty healthy jump in pre-blower IATs to have any measurable impact on performance.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2023, 07:29 PM   #107
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
You might be reaching at items of diminishing returns in my humble opinion.
I agree. That's why I haven't gotten past just thinking about it. I'm now looking at a ram air intake snout.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2023, 10:17 AM   #108
CamOnlyJabroni
 
CamOnlyJabroni's Avatar
 
Drives: 19’ ZL1 A10 / 16’ C7Z M7
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 247
For this kind of test I would do three things to make sure all variables are the same.

-Ambient Temp Within a Couple of Degrees
-Drive The Car Around Enough to Heat Soak "Stop and Go Traffic Before Highway Pull"
-Do The Same Run "Looks Like You Ran Out 4th not 5th On the After Pull"

Not saying it didn't help. Will just help the test be more accurate is all IMO.
CamOnlyJabroni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2023, 01:19 PM   #109
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamOnlyJabroni View Post
For this kind of test I would do three things to make sure all variables are the same.

-Ambient Temp Within a Couple of Degrees
-Drive The Car Around Enough to Heat Soak "Stop and Go Traffic Before Highway Pull"
-Do The Same Run "Looks Like You Ran Out 4th not 5th On the After Pull"

Not saying it didn't help. Will just help the test be more accurate is all IMO.
Wrapping the headers (actually blasting, painting, and DEI wrap) and all water lines have lowered engine compartment temps a lot. It's immediately noticeable when I pop the hood. I contacted Edelbrock and they didn't like the inlet/ snout insulation idea.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2023, 05:30 PM   #110
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
I bought a CWA-150 and it’s sitting in my garage. That’s definitely going in this winter. The Varimax isn’t cutting it IMO.
I put a CWA400 on it last month. Flow is much better. Still need to change outlet and inlet fittings.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.