Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V6 LGX Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2017, 12:29 AM   #197
10efra
 
Drives: 1 Lt 3.6
Join Date: May 2017
Location: West New York, NJ
Posts: 31
Hey everyone! Wondering if anyone from NJ got this done or knows where to get it done, if the dealer won't do it
I didn't know a thing about Carb states smh
10efra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2017, 01:57 AM   #198
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
Any news on it coming to Canada.
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2017, 11:08 AM   #199
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
The idea that GM is putting out products that aren't 50 state legal is retarded. GM knows that an after market intake needs to retain all emissions related crap from the stock intake like that dumb carbon pad but they intentionally left it out of their gmpp intake, ensuring it will never be carb compliant.

They didn't need to leave it out, they chose to. Though so have companies like k&n that know for a fact what will be required because they have compliant products for the 5th gen which has the same carbon pad.

Not sure what the plan is with these companies. Seems like they have gone out of their way to not design for 50 state. Which makes no sense financially since they should already have a good idea of what will pass even if they don't submit for testing right away.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2017, 01:38 PM   #200
Bongos2U
 
Drives: Hopefully 6th gen Camaro
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Socal
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
The idea that GM is putting out products that aren't 50 state legal is retarded. GM knows that an after market intake needs to retain all emissions related crap from the stock intake like that dumb carbon pad but they intentionally left it out of their gmpp intake, ensuring it will never be carb compliant.

They didn't need to leave it out, they chose to. Though so have companies like k&n that know for a fact what will be required because they have compliant products for the 5th gen which has the same carbon pad.

Not sure what the plan is with these companies. Seems like they have gone out of their way to not design for 50 state. Which makes no sense financially since they should already have a good idea of what will pass even if they don't submit for testing right away.

Exactly !!
Bongos2U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2017, 11:17 AM   #201
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
The idea that GM is putting out products that aren't 50 state legal is retarded. GM knows that an after market intake needs to retain all emissions related crap from the stock intake like that dumb carbon pad but they intentionally left it out of their gmpp intake, ensuring it will never be carb compliant.

They didn't need to leave it out, they chose to. Though so have companies like k&n that know for a fact what will be required because they have compliant products for the 5th gen which has the same carbon pad.

Not sure what the plan is with these companies. Seems like they have gone out of their way to not design for 50 state. Which makes no sense financially since they should already have a good idea of what will pass even if they don't submit for testing right away.
That must be why it is not available in Canada as well. Such a shame
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2017, 03:52 PM   #202
COmaro
 
Drives: Many
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 220
Maybe I missed it somewhere, but is there any dyno evidence that the GM intake/tune does anything more than drain your wallet?
COmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2017, 04:12 PM   #203
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
I've done 0-60 runs on various roads that have a 60+ speed limit and my times are well within the margin of error of being the same as when i was running my K&N drop-in filters. That's with the aFe intake rather than the GM one.

I think the higher flow filter makes the majority of the difference (if there is any) and the rest is all for visual aesthetics...as they dont really improve on the OEM design much at all.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 11:14 AM   #204
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
I've done 0-60 runs on various roads that have a 60+ speed limit and my times are well within the margin of error of being the same as when i was running my K&N drop-in filters. That's with the aFe intake rather than the GM one.

I think the higher flow filter makes the majority of the difference (if there is any) and the rest is all for visual aesthetics...as they dont really improve on the OEM design much at all.
:happy 0180:

think I might order the drop in then.
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 03:16 PM   #205
terri_Lovehands
 
terri_Lovehands's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS NPP
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianharrison06 View Post
Got mine installed today was around $129 at stonebrair in Frisco TX they knew not to charge for flash. I like it, definitely looks like it should go there. Now where do I put that GM Badge lol

Quick question how often do you need to change the air filter on this one and where can I order more of the filters

How does the car feel after the intake and tune. I'm thinking of going the GM route but I don't know the benefit other than warranty.
terri_Lovehands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2017, 08:29 AM   #206
Lukemo
 
Lukemo's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1LT RS V6 6M NPP
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 449
Got mine installed finally! While not a huge difference, it is most definitely a noticeable one.

Throttle is more lively and the car feels a little stronger all over, especially on the freeway. I'm happy with it!
Attached Images
 
Lukemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2017, 08:33 AM   #207
Lukemo
 
Lukemo's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1LT RS V6 6M NPP
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianharrison06 View Post
Quick question how often do you need to change the air filter on this one and where can I order more of the filters

I'm pretty sure you just rinse it off when it gets dirty. I think I had a K&N cleaning kit a while back when I had one of these on my '04 GTO. Shouldn't ever have to replace it. Google "cold air intake cleaning kit".

*EDIT*
Actually, I just read this in the installation manual, so I'm not real sure how to clean the filter...
Filter Caution
Caution: Filter must be replaced if saturated with water. Only use Genuine Replacement Chevrolet Performance Air Filters.

This is on the GM website:
Add an element of performance-oriented style to your vehicle with this 3.6L Cold Air Intake System. It looks great under the hood and includes a reusable open-element air filter, a sealed compartment and all necessary installation hardware. This upgrade creates up to a 15% reduction in pressure drop and is legal in 37 states.
.
.
.

Last edited by Lukemo; 07-06-2017 at 09:31 AM.
Lukemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 09:32 PM   #208
GhostEye07
 
GhostEye07's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro 2LT RS
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 144
Just came back from getting a Tune on 91/E85, and was told when they tried to get a baseline dyno run that it was running "Massively Lean" with this intake without the tune.

You either need the GM tune or a custom tune..

Basically do not run this intake without the tune or you will be running VERY VERY LEAN!
__________________
2016 Camaro 2LT RS E85 V6
Build Thread | My Instagram
GhostEye07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 10:26 PM   #209
GhostEye07
 
GhostEye07's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro 2LT RS
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooper1965 View Post
The tune is included, why not get it flashed? Trust me, GM watches every penny, they would not include a tune unless ABSOLUTELY necessary.
I was unfortunately unable to get a tune as I live in a CARB state....good ol CALIFORNIA!
__________________
2016 Camaro 2LT RS E85 V6
Build Thread | My Instagram
GhostEye07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2017, 08:00 AM   #210
Lukemo
 
Lukemo's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 1LT RS V6 6M NPP
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by GhostEye07 View Post
Just came back from getting a Tune on 91/E85, and was told when they tried to get a baseline dyno run that it was running "Massively Lean" with this intake without the tune.

You either need the GM tune or a custom tune..

Basically do not run this intake without the tune or you will be running VERY VERY LEAN!
Yikes! Glad I did it by the book... I had Rodgers Chevrolet install the intake and tune.
Lukemo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.