Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2015, 11:20 AM   #1
Bizaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
NO NO NO NO NO TTV6 Fail

http://jalopnik.com/ford-gt-this-is-it-1678893649

TT v6? REALLY? LOL FORD

I seriously hope people stop with this TTv6 BS!!! Camaro6 and Zora better not even think about it!
Bizaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:22 AM   #2
LOBBS
 
LOBBS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 472
Unfortunately, it is the future. Big V8s will soon be regulated out of existence.
LOBBS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:25 AM   #3
ZED SLED


 
ZED SLED's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Mosaic Bk ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South of Raleigh, NC
Posts: 9,477
Cadillac ATS-V
TT V6 450hp. You know it's going to end up on other platforms.
I don't have an issue with that. Like it or not, it's coming.
__________________

ZED SLED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:29 AM   #4
Bizaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
Dont you think its a little too early for a ttv6 on a halo car? maybe in another 10 years but not now! Its as if stingray would of came out with a ttv6
Bizaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:29 AM   #5
maddoggyusa

 
maddoggyusa's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro Dusk 2SS/6
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,586
GM said they were thinking about TTV6 for a "cheaper" corvette but determined it didn't really save any mpg. I think you'll be seeing a 5.3L v8 "cheaper" vette in the future. stingray is supposed to be the high end corvette. not all future corvettes will be stingrays.

meanwhile you know the new M4 is a turbo 6 right? it's no slouch. I prefer V8 but turbo 6 can be done right. but never sounds like a v8
maddoggyusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:30 AM   #6
Bizaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddoggyusa View Post
GM said they were thinking about TTV6 for a "cheaper" corvette but determined it didn't really save any mpg. I think you'll be seeing a 5.3L "cheaper" vette in the future.

meanwhile you know the new M4 is a turbo 6 right? it's no slouch. I prefer V8 but turbo 6 can be done right. but never sounds like a v8
yeah m4 v6 with the sound synthesizers inside the cabin
Bizaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:36 AM   #7
KaBoom1701
KaBoom1701
 
KaBoom1701's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,630
I'm glad I bought my ZL1 when I did...
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats.
KaBoom1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:38 AM   #8
NJScorpio

 
NJScorpio's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1LT Hyper Blue Metallic
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,122
Forgive me for not knowing but............

IIRC, a turbo has an abrupt power curve because you have to wait for the exhaust to be generated, then fed back to spool the turbo. Superchargers give you perhaps less power, but more linear power, at the cost of torque. I imagine a supercharger produces a more pleasing power curve and better low end response, without any lag associated with turbos.

My question is...how much displacement is needed to justify a supercharger setup over a turbo? Could there be a high displacement 6 (like a 4.8 liter) with a supercharger?
NJScorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:45 AM   #9
Evergreen6

 
Drives: 2023 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJScorpio View Post
Forgive me for not knowing but............

IIRC, a turbo has an abrupt power curve because you have to wait for the exhaust to be generated, then fed back to spool the turbo. Superchargers give you perhaps less power, but more linear power, at the cost of torque. I imagine a supercharger produces a more pleasing power curve and better low end response, without any lag associated with turbos.

My question is...how much displacement is needed to justify a supercharger setup over a turbo? Could there be a high displacement 6 (like a 4.8 liter) with a supercharger?
Audi has been using a 3.0L supercharged six which is rated at 333hp in the S4 and is supposedly grossly understated from the factory. The engine has been out for the better part of 5 years now.

I don't know about in other applications, but that 3.0T (The 'T' is misleading, it's not turbo'd) absolutely rips in the S4. Sounds great.

Also, "turbo lag" which you mentioned has been sharply reduced in modern applications. The smaller the turbo, the faster it can spool up and provide maximum torque at very low RPM-- which is why they're so great in diesels. Ford and BMW and others are now using twin turbos-- two small ones-- and the lag is almost non-existent.
Evergreen6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:51 AM   #10
MEDISIN

 
MEDISIN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CTS-V Sedan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evergreen6 View Post
Audi has been using a 3.0L supercharged six which is rated at 333hp in the S4 and is supposedly grossly understated from the factory. The engine has been out for the better part of 5 years now.

I don't know about in other applications, but that 3.0T (The 'T' is misleading, it's not turbo'd) absolutely rips in the S4. Sounds great.

Also, "turbo lag" which you mentioned has been sharply reduced in modern applications. The smaller the turbo, the faster it can spool up and provide maximum torque at very low RPM-- which is why they're so great in diesels. Ford and BMW and others are now using twin turbos-- two small ones-- and the lag is almost non-existent.
Jaguar/Land Rover also use a 340hp, 3.0L supercharged V6 as their "base engine" in place of the lovely 5.0L NA V8.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft.

"Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree
MEDISIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:53 AM   #11
ssrs2lt


 
ssrs2lt's Avatar
 
Drives: too many
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: oh va pa ma tx
Posts: 3,046
Sorry but ttv6 here to stay..
__________________
ssrs2lt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 11:56 AM   #12
turboguy327
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 704
I can make 6 PSI at idle with a VG turbo on my cummins. The PCM stock commands .5 PSI at idle.
turboguy327 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 12:08 PM   #13
NJScorpio

 
NJScorpio's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1LT Hyper Blue Metallic
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evergreen6 View Post
Audi has been using a 3.0L supercharged six which is rated at 333hp in the S4 and is supposedly grossly understated from the factory. The engine has been out for the better part of 5 years now.

I don't know about in other applications, but that 3.0T (The 'T' is misleading, it's not turbo'd) absolutely rips in the S4. Sounds great.

Also, "turbo lag" which you mentioned has been sharply reduced in modern applications. The smaller the turbo, the faster it can spool up and provide maximum torque at very low RPM-- which is why they're so great in diesels. Ford and BMW and others are now using twin turbos-- two small ones-- and the lag is almost non-existent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
Jaguar/Land Rover also use a 340hp, 3.0L supercharged V6 as their "base engine" in place of the lovely 5.0L NA V8.
Thanks!
NJScorpio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2015, 12:11 PM   #14
JantzenOKC


 
JantzenOKC's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 2LT/RS Twin Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,073
Welcome to the future...
__________________
3.6L Twin Turbo V6
Garrett GT28 turbos -- Jacfab forged connecting rods -- Diamond forged pistons(10.5:1) -- Alky Control Methonal Injection -- CircleD 2E triple disc torque converter -- BMR suspension
10.75 @ 131mph
JantzenOKC is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.