01-12-2015, 11:20 AM | #1 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
|
NO NO NO NO NO TTV6 Fail
http://jalopnik.com/ford-gt-this-is-it-1678893649
TT v6? REALLY? LOL FORD I seriously hope people stop with this TTv6 BS!!! Camaro6 and Zora better not even think about it! |
01-12-2015, 11:22 AM | #2 |
Unfortunately, it is the future. Big V8s will soon be regulated out of existence.
|
|
01-12-2015, 11:25 AM | #3 |
Drives: 2017 Mosaic Bk ZL1 M6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South of Raleigh, NC
Posts: 9,477
|
Cadillac ATS-V
TT V6 450hp. You know it's going to end up on other platforms. I don't have an issue with that. Like it or not, it's coming.
__________________
|
01-12-2015, 11:29 AM | #4 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
|
Dont you think its a little too early for a ttv6 on a halo car? maybe in another 10 years but not now! Its as if stingray would of came out with a ttv6
|
01-12-2015, 11:29 AM | #5 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro Dusk 2SS/6 Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,586
|
GM said they were thinking about TTV6 for a "cheaper" corvette but determined it didn't really save any mpg. I think you'll be seeing a 5.3L v8 "cheaper" vette in the future. stingray is supposed to be the high end corvette. not all future corvettes will be stingrays.
meanwhile you know the new M4 is a turbo 6 right? it's no slouch. I prefer V8 but turbo 6 can be done right. but never sounds like a v8 |
01-12-2015, 11:30 AM | #6 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 Redhot 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 1,409
|
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2015, 11:36 AM | #7 |
KaBoom1701
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,630
|
I'm glad I bought my ZL1 when I did...
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats. |
01-12-2015, 11:38 AM | #8 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1LT Hyper Blue Metallic Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,122
|
Forgive me for not knowing but............
IIRC, a turbo has an abrupt power curve because you have to wait for the exhaust to be generated, then fed back to spool the turbo. Superchargers give you perhaps less power, but more linear power, at the cost of torque. I imagine a supercharger produces a more pleasing power curve and better low end response, without any lag associated with turbos. My question is...how much displacement is needed to justify a supercharger setup over a turbo? Could there be a high displacement 6 (like a 4.8 liter) with a supercharger? |
01-12-2015, 11:45 AM | #9 | |
Drives: 2023 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 1,437
|
Quote:
I don't know about in other applications, but that 3.0T (The 'T' is misleading, it's not turbo'd) absolutely rips in the S4. Sounds great. Also, "turbo lag" which you mentioned has been sharply reduced in modern applications. The smaller the turbo, the faster it can spool up and provide maximum torque at very low RPM-- which is why they're so great in diesels. Ford and BMW and others are now using twin turbos-- two small ones-- and the lag is almost non-existent. |
|
01-12-2015, 11:51 AM | #10 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
|
01-12-2015, 11:53 AM | #11 |
Drives: too many Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: oh va pa ma tx
Posts: 3,046
|
Sorry but ttv6 here to stay..
__________________
|
01-12-2015, 11:56 AM | #12 |
Banned
Drives: 2011 Chevy Camaro Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 704
|
I can make 6 PSI at idle with a VG turbo on my cummins. The PCM stock commands .5 PSI at idle.
|
01-12-2015, 12:08 PM | #13 | |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1LT Hyper Blue Metallic Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,122
|
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2015, 12:11 PM | #14 |
Drives: '13 2LT/RS Twin Turbo Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,073
|
Welcome to the future...
__________________
3.6L Twin Turbo V6 Garrett GT28 turbos -- Jacfab forged connecting rods -- Diamond forged pistons(10.5:1) -- Alky Control Methonal Injection -- CircleD 2E triple disc torque converter -- BMR suspension 10.75 @ 131mph |
Post Reply
|
|
|