11-19-2019, 09:35 AM | #29 |
@texan.1le
Drives: '18 Camaro 1SS 1LE, PDR Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 182
|
Getting rid of Static Retard didn't get rid of the dip. Showed up again on a pull from a few days ago. I haven't changed MAP estimation settings yet. I'm about to start logging and tweaking spark advance channels, so if it does show up on a pull, I should be able to ID what is pulling it or at least which spark advance modifier is giving out or dropping.
__________________
'18 1SS 1LE - "Mongoose"
'15 Malibu 2LT - daily |
11-20-2019, 08:52 AM | #30 |
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 139
|
[QUOTE=Z0Tex;10663467]Getting rid of Static Retard didn't get rid of the dip. Showed up again on a pull from a few days ago. I haven't changed MAP estimation settings yet. I'm about to start logging and tweaking spark advance channels, so if it does show up on a pull, I should be able to ID what is pulling it or at least which spark advance modifier is giving out or dropping.
Thats weird just checked my recent long and dont see anything like that on mine |
11-20-2019, 09:22 AM | #31 |
Drives: 6th gen Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,664
|
What’s your vve table look like?
|
11-22-2019, 10:03 AM | #32 |
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 139
|
email me nick@evoics.com
|
11-22-2019, 10:23 AM | #33 |
Drives: 6th gen Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,664
|
I was asking z0tex. Curious as that could be the issue
|
11-22-2019, 10:38 AM | #34 |
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 139
|
|
10-31-2020, 09:56 AM | #35 |
Drives: chevy camamro SS Join Date: May 2020
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7
|
I'm having a similar issue with my 16 M6 car but at 19% throttle. The car will pull 20* and run like crap until I give it more gas. My tuner is pretty stumped and I'm annoyed. He can get it to go away but not without having idle hang *♂️*♂️
|
10-31-2020, 10:24 AM | #36 |
Drives: 6th gen Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,664
|
Mods?
__________________
‘22 2SS 1LE M6 Summit White - RF, Flexfuel, LT2 intake, 95mm tb, ATI udp, VT ramair, full 28” dragpack - 11.68@122
‘16 1SS M6 LT2 intake + boltons on DR 11.0@126+ (Sold) |
11-01-2020, 10:45 AM | #37 |
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85 Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,196
|
Don't take my words 100% but I get the same thing and people are using the virtual torque tables to get rid of it. I believe they are increasing the torque values in these RPM/airmass regions to get rid of it:
You can see from the above log that there is "Torque Management Advance" that is pulling timing. But if you look at the immediate torque source it is "None". I have tried the max torque tables as well and from the screenshot the final throttle torque request is above the maximum engine torque. The immediate torque control is very low at 413 ft-lbs, but if its source is still set to "none" I don't believe it to be the source of the problem. Our biggest problem is all these torque PID's that seem to contradict one another and you can't find any information on what they actually mean and how they correlate to the tables we have available. |
11-17-2020, 09:16 PM | #38 |
Drives: 2007.5 Duramax Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Houston
Posts: 101
|
One thing to try is under the cutoff Tab and under the cold engine table see if you are hitting the 6000rpm cutoff. I’ve read that this table can go far beyond the time limit listed. If this is the case you could set the lowest rpm to say 6500 and see if you pull timing at 6500 instead of 6000.
__________________
Built C6Z 600whp NA - SOLD
Built LSX 96SS - SOLD 68 Camaro - 6.2/10l80, self built and tuned. |
|
|
Post Reply
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|