Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-14-2018, 07:16 PM   #1
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
LT headers for your FI car

Which headers did you add. Did you happen to dyno before and after to see the impact of headers on a FI car? It makes sense they would help, but watching cars run 700rwhp with stock internals and exhaust makes me wonder how important it is.

What do you think?
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2018, 07:27 PM   #2
Atomic Ed

 
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
I focused on the intake side of the equation on my Edelbrock. Rotofab, ported throttle body, ported snout, and down one size from the stock upper pulley. About $600 dollars outlay, and with a little work, walked away with a extra 100 rwhp and torque. Much better bang for the buck.

662 rwhp on the stock exhaust and still lots of potential left. Definitely would benefit from a set of headers, but I'm out of the safe zone of the pistons. Headers would just push me that farther off the cliff.

Besides, It still sounds stock. I like the stealth approach.
Atomic Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2018, 07:34 PM   #3
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Really great feedback. Kind of what I was thinking too. Although headers will lower boost too, right? In some ways I wonder if freeing up the exhaust might make it safer. I have added headers on my other builds, but other than sound, I always coupled it with too many other changes to really assign a value.
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2018, 07:47 PM   #4
Atomic Ed

 
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
It will lower your boost, but mass airflow will increase. By the time you tune for the increased flow, your risk factor will be about the same....might be a little lower risk, but not much.
Atomic Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2018, 08:18 PM   #5
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic Ed View Post
It will lower your boost, but mass airflow will increase. By the time you tune for the increased flow, your risk factor will be about the same....might be a little lower risk, but not much.
Did you have to address fuel to reach that level? We saw the hpfp dropping above 550rwhp so we dialed it back to 550rwhp to be safe.

Those are really solid numbers on the Edelbrock...nice. That’s a blower I have never seen in person.

The headers definitely make the car louder. I am planning to go with the JRE cam...I think I am leaning toward forged pistons instead of headers...but hoping someone on the forum has some insight to share.
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2018, 11:00 PM   #6
Atomic Ed

 
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
The Edelbrock and the Magnuson are basically twin sisters. Very comparable overall.

As for the fuel, I did add a ZL1 pump in the tank and we tweaked both the ZL1 pump and the stock HPFP control modules to get the fuel we needed.
Atomic Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 04:48 AM   #7
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic Ed View Post
The Edelbrock and the Magnuson are basically twin sisters. Very comparable overall.

As for the fuel, I did add a ZL1 pump in the tank and we tweaked both the ZL1 pump and the stock HPFP control modules to get the fuel we needed.
I have fuel components sitting in my office now, waiting for install so I can up the boost. I am also going to add e85 for a little more.

Back to regularly scheduled programming, I am curious if anyone is seeing a big benefit from headers with the FI application. At what power level do we need them?
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:08 AM   #8
Dysan911

 
Dysan911's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 50th Anniversary 2SS
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 930
After I did my fuel mods and went to a smaller pulley on my P1. During the tuning phase we were trying to chase down some knock retard occurring up high during every pull. Ted Jannetty who tunes my car suggested it was probably time I consider LT's with either highflow cats or an off road pipe to resolve this issue. I believe he ran into the same problem with the Hellion Twin Turbo setup as well. It's my assumption that once the stock cats are removed or replaced with a high-flow version will lower the boost and allow you to run better timing and make more power.

Also isn't it pretty common that FI vehicles run the risk of melting stock cats?

Really old post but if you google the topic it's pretty common

https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=183230
__________________
Former Ride: 17 Camaro 2SS, M6 - Fifty | Procharger P1SC | 3.7 Pulley | Stage 2 IC | Race Bypass | DSX FF Kit | JRE Custom E85 Flex Fuel Tune | LT4 Fuel System | JMS Voltage Booster | MSD Plug Wires | American Racing 1-7/8's LT Headers Full System Catback | Baro Breakout Harness | LT4 Map Sensor | Katech Ported TB | MMS Oil Catch Can | 160 Thermo | Solo Performance J-Pipes

Dysan911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:14 AM   #9
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dysan911 View Post
After I did my fuel mods and went to a smaller pulley on my P1. During the tuning phase we were trying to chase down some knock retard occurring up high during every pull. Ted Jannetty who tunes my car suggested it was probably time I consider LT's with either highflow cats or an off road pipe to resolve this issue. I believe he ran into the same problem with the Hellion Twin Turbo setup as well. It's my assumption that once the stock cats are removed or replaced with a high-flow version will lower the boost and allow you to run better timing and make more power.

Also isn't it pretty common that FI vehicles run the risk of melting stock cats?

Really old post but if you google the topic it's pretty common

https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=183230
Yeah. Let headers and high flow cats seem to be the way. I suppose I will need to add that along with the cam and pistons. Now to find a brand and an option to work with the convertibles.

After the high flow cats and headers did the tuning problem disappear? Which headers did you go with?
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:28 AM   #10
Joe's_cool_1le

 
Drives: Black 2017 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dysan911 View Post
After I did my fuel mods and went to a smaller pulley on my P1. During the tuning phase we were trying to chase down some knock retard occurring up high during every pull. Ted Jannetty who tunes my car suggested it was probably time I consider LT's with either highflow cats or an off road pipe to resolve this issue. I believe he ran into the same problem with the Hellion Twin Turbo setup as well. It's my assumption that once the stock cats are removed or replaced with a high-flow version will lower the boost and allow you to run better timing and make more power.

Also isn't it pretty common that FI vehicles run the risk of melting stock cats?

Really old post but if you google the topic it's pretty common

https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=183230
I trashed my high flow cats on my 1 7/8 Kooks in less then 6 months. That was during the hot season with excess beating.
__________________
2017 1LE SS Black - Mods - Forged - lowered compression - BTR custom Cam - Whipple, 3.500 upper and 8.0 lower pulley, Roto-Fab, 1 7/8 Kooks headers, off road pipes, & 3" Kooks full exhaust. LT4 fuel system, with Alky single nozzle running 100% meth. (not installed yet) DSX Tuning flex fuel and DSX tuning Aux pump
Joe's_cool_1le is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:37 AM   #11
Dysan911

 
Dysan911's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 50th Anniversary 2SS
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drsagacity View Post
After the high flow cats and headers did the tuning problem disappear? Which headers did you go with?
Haven't gotten them yet but plan on running a set of 1 7/8 American Racing Headers in the very near future with HF Cats. Ted was able to resolve the KR but I'm pretty certain we left some power on the table due to the timing, etc that was pulled out.
Dysan911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:39 AM   #12
Dysan911

 
Dysan911's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 50th Anniversary 2SS
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe's_cool_1le View Post
I trashed my high flow cats on my 1 7/8 Kooks in less then 6 months. That was during the hot season with excess beating.
Oh wow. I was hoping to hear the HF version were built to withstand more abuse. I considered running no cats but would prefer to have them to help control the exhaust volume/rasp and prevent the fuel smell.
Dysan911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:46 AM   #13
Mark114

 
Mark114's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dysan911 View Post

Also isn't it pretty common that FI vehicles run the risk of melting stock cats?
Actually I think it might be the other way around. I believe the factory cats are ceramic and can take the heat but maybe don't have the flow. Aftermarket cats are coiled metal foil that can soften and deform under high pressure IIRC.
Mark114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2018, 07:49 AM   #14
Drsagacity

 
Drsagacity's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Nightfall Gray vert
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Swansea, IL
Posts: 1,219
Geesh. This is bringing back bad memories of one of the adventures I had with a Vette.

The combination cam, LT headers and no cats = too loud and momma didn’t even want to drive in the car.
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS vert - Nightfall Gray
Magnuson Heartbeat SC - Tuned by JRE Racing
776whp/745wtq (12psi)

2018 Corvette Z06 vert- Black
To be tuned by JRE Racing
TBD performance
Drsagacity is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.