09-06-2016, 09:26 AM | #43 |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
I have never heard of anything like that.
|
09-06-2016, 12:11 PM | #44 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Let me know how you like it. My daily driver is a '14 2.0 Ecoboost. 40,000 trouble free miles so far. Thinking of upgrading to a 2.7 next year.
|
09-06-2016, 12:15 PM | #45 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
It may be more so the opposite. Reduced boost in lower gears. Not sure about the 2.7, but like most new cars (especially autos) there is noticeable torque management at WOT in my 2.0. My 2.0 is tuned now though, not even all that aggressively, and it picked up .5 in the 1/4 mile...still gets about 30 mpg's too on the highway.
|
09-06-2016, 02:32 PM | #46 |
Drives: "Kara Zor-El" 2017 2SS HBM Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lower Hudson Valley
Posts: 2,036
|
I'd like to see the 0-60 numbers. She's heavy, almost 4000 lbs on a car with 325hp I wouldn't think would be too fast off the line. My 2013 Regal GS has that much hp after a tune and ZZP CAI and it is almost 400 pounds lighter. It isn't too fast off the line because it is a 4 cylinder but once the boost builds t takes off. Maybe the V6 makes up for it.
__________________
Lead me not into temptation. I already know the way.
Lana? Lana? LANA! LAAANAAAA!!!! What? Dangerzoooooone. |
09-07-2016, 09:42 AM | #47 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
0-60 5.6 0-100 14.8 1/4 14.2 @ 98MPH I would expect the Fusion with less weight and more power to be better than those numbers which should make for a fun DD. |
|
09-07-2016, 11:17 AM | #48 | |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
I think the Sport should be in the 13.70 range, maybe better with the AWD compared to my FWD crap. |
|
09-07-2016, 11:24 AM | #49 |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
Keep in mind...it may be "only" 325 HP..but it's also cranking out 380TQ...only 10 ft lb's less than the 1st Gen Coyote.
|
09-07-2016, 01:29 PM | #50 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
|
09-07-2016, 08:01 PM | #51 |
Iron fist, lead foot
Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,227
|
Add to that that the 5.0's torque peak was delivered at 4250rpm and the 2.7EB's is at 3000rpm, at least in F150, Fusion's gearing and tune may make this different.
__________________
'03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 || modded with mods'n'stuff
|
09-07-2016, 08:34 PM | #52 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Biggest issue is the weight gain. It's going to be close to 4000 pounds. That is 500 more than mine...
|
09-07-2016, 08:43 PM | #53 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2013 1LT RS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 3,494
|
So a 4400 pound 4 cylinder with the aero of roughly a brick, has a better 0-60 time and the same 0-100 and 1/4 mile time as a 323 hp 3705 pound 5gen LT Camaro? I find that hard to believe....might be true, but I find it hard to believe, I'll have to find one and race it
|
09-07-2016, 08:55 PM | #54 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2013 1LT RS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 3,494
|
Well, the 380 tq is 100 more than the LFX. Low tq is the weak point of the na V-6.
|
09-08-2016, 06:41 AM | #55 | |
Iron fist, lead foot
Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,227
|
Quote:
__________________
'03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 || modded with mods'n'stuff
|
|
09-08-2016, 12:35 PM | #56 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro LT2/RS Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 248
|
|
Post Reply
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|