Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Bigwormgraphix


Thread Closed
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2021, 03:32 PM   #99
NeverDie
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: AZ
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingHawk View Post
"Investors, of course, are looking further into the future than most consumers are, and guessing about changes that haven’t happened yet. Most people who buy a car during the next five years will buy a gas-powered vehicle. Electrics still have premium prices and are inconvenient for long trips, which have to be structured around charging opportunities. They’re still nowhere near as convenient as gas models that can be fueled at almost every highway exit in five minutes.

But changes at the laboratory and factory level will presage changes in the showroom. With investors viewing internal-combustion powertrains as a dying technology, there’s likely to be little new investment, with research dollars flowing instead to the electrification efforts investors value. That will speed innovation and lower costs. Charging stations will proliferate and get faster, minimizing the inconvenience of electrics. At some crossover point, gas stations will start to disappear, and electric cars will start to seem like the obvious choice for just about everybody. Whenever that happens, it will be the wrong time to be hawking V-6 and V-8 engines."

...
...
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gasol...210636353.html

...

Yikes. Well here are your choices folks(all $40K plus):





...

If you have 10 million dollars:

All $40K plus, huh?

VW ID.4 is $32,495 after federal tax credits.
BMW i3 base is $36,950 after federal tax credits.
Chevrolet Bolt is $32,890 BEFORE federal tax credits with current incentives.
Tesla Model 3: SR+ is $37,990 BEFORE federal tax credits.

All pricing pulled directly from each manufacturer's website just now.
NeverDie is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 03:38 PM   #100
Malbjey
 
Malbjey's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Kia Stinger GT2
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeverDie View Post
All $40K plus, huh?

VW ID.4 is $32,495 after federal tax credits.
BMW i3 base is $36,950 after federal tax credits.
Chevrolet Bolt is $32,890 BEFORE federal tax credits with current incentives.
Tesla Model 3: SR+ is $37,990 BEFORE federal tax credits.

All pricing pulled directly from each manufacturer's website just now.

Isn't it funny? There are plenty of people on this site who paid 40k plus for a car they only use as a weekend toy.
Malbjey is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:00 PM   #101
StingrayblueSS

 
StingrayblueSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indiana
Posts: 901
https://youtu.be/k_Nt2QPgVVE pretty good commercial.
__________________
2013 Camaro SS
Kooks Headers Vararam DRX 1le Differential 3.91
Bo White throttle body Magnaflow Competition Exhaust
12.391 112 MPH 10/05/19
StingrayblueSS is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:17 PM   #102
MackSteelPrivateEye
Banned
 
Drives: 6 on the Flo' Super Sport
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: md
Posts: 1,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtirocz View Post
The data being referenced was obviously nationwide across the US, where in 2019, coal was the source of 23% of the total US electricity that was generated. That # is falling at a fast rate (see the plot in that link).
Well if its no longer coal then you can believe that Fossil fuels like in the Keystone Pipeline has taken its place. Biden just killed that and wants to go back to foreign oil dependence. Look for skyrocketing fuel prices at the pump heating our homes and higher electricity. Absolutely pathetic.
MackSteelPrivateEye is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:19 PM   #103
RagingHawk
 
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :)
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeverDie View Post

VW ID.4 is $32,495 after federal tax credits.
I am giving MSRP prices, Volkswagen ID.4 comes as edition 1 model in the states in the beginning, with $45,190 MSRP. Cheapest variant is $41,190. AWD version will be $44,890.

Federal tax credits will not be here forever. Actually they expire in 2022 unless Congress renews them. After sale of 200,000 units, the tax credit winds down until it fully expires one year later.

Quote:
BMW i3 base is $36,950 after federal tax credits.
BMW i3 MSRP is $44,450.


Quote:
Tesla Model 3: SR+ is $37,990 BEFORE federal tax credits.
You can no longer get any federal tax credits on Tesla's. Base standard RWD model with 250 mile range does cost that much. The AWD version starts at $40K.

I put the Bolt to showcase the design language of these new EV's, I am aware it is the most affordable option out of the bunch. Should have clarified that.

That being said, they are all ugly and inferior to many other ICE options. Why would someone be excited about these prices for inferior products?
RagingHawk is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:20 PM   #104
MackSteelPrivateEye
Banned
 
Drives: 6 on the Flo' Super Sport
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: md
Posts: 1,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by StingrayblueSS View Post
https://youtu.be/k_Nt2QPgVVE pretty good commercial.
After watching this Hollyweed commercial, I gots to git me an EV now!!!
MackSteelPrivateEye is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:21 PM   #105
RagingHawk
 
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :)
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malbjey View Post
Isn't it funny? There are plenty of people on this site who paid 40k plus for a car they only use as a weekend toy.
Are you comparing small econo CUV's with fully optioned sports cars with superior suspension parts, tuning, and performance equipment? I would always take a 40K Camaro V8 over an EV econobox in a base configuration.
RagingHawk is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:25 PM   #106
RagingHawk
 
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :)
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by MackSteelPrivateEye View Post
After watching this Hollyweed commercial, I gots to git me an EV now!!!
You'd be surprised how many consumers are lining up to reserve a Volkswagen ID.4 that costs 45K and has a range of 250 miles, because they want to be the first people in them so they can show it off to their friends. You can get a Golf GTI for half that price and it will be superior in every way. I don't get people.
RagingHawk is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:26 PM   #107
Petrol Head
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Fast if no one's looking
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,794
Norwegians eat raw shark meat that’s been fermenting in barns.

This is America. We eat steak and burgers grilled on the grille. Who cares how many electric cars they sell?

And that new GM logo is awful.

#notmygm
Petrol Head is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:35 PM   #108
UnknownJinX

 
UnknownJinX's Avatar
 
Drives: 19 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE Shock
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingHawk View Post
Are you comparing small econo CUV's with fully optioned sports cars with superior suspension parts, tuning, and performance equipment? I would always take a 40K Camaro V8 over an EV econobox in a base configuration.
That's exactly the point. The EV equivalent of an ICE vehicle, as it stands now, is more expensive to purchase.

The fuel cost will take a while to offset, depending on where you live.

But remember, no one cross-shops a Bolt or ID4 with a Camaro or Mustang. Not even a lot of people would cross-shop a Model 3 with a pony car. Different audience entirely.

Sent from toaster or something
__________________
Current:
2019 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE M6 Shock

GM Performance Intake and that's it, because driver mods before car mods

Past:
2009 Mazda RX-8 GT M6 Velocity Red Mica (Sold)
2015 Chevrolet Corvette Z51 2LT M7 Velocity Yellow Tintcoat (Flood totaled)
UnknownJinX is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:47 PM   #109
RagingHawk
 
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :)
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnknownJinX View Post
That's exactly the point. The EV equivalent of an ICE vehicle, as it stands now, is more expensive to purchase.

The fuel cost will take a while to offset, depending on where you live.

But remember, no one cross-shops a Bolt or ID4 with a Camaro or Mustang. Not even a lot of people would cross-shop a Model 3 with a pony car. Different audience entirely.

Sent from toaster or something
Agreed, I was surprised by him comparing them to a Camaro. No one would cross shop them but looking at it from value perspective you are getting more for your 40K going towards a Camaro SS. As I said, if there are EV equivalents to ICE affordable sports coupes/sedans/hatchbacks, then EV's would have a case and we can let free market decide. Problem is the market will not provide them until at least 2030, if even. However, government regulation may force us out of ICE sports vehicles before 2035, by various means mentioned by other posters here. And we will have to get one of these EV econoboxes instead of comparable ICE luxury sedan or sports cars.
RagingHawk is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:49 PM   #110
Martinjlm
Retired from GM
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,233
Electric sports cars are coming. The cadence has been like:
  1. Penalty boxes small enough to get half decent range using 1st gen battery tech
  2. Luxury sedans big enough to hold a crap ton of batteries and expensive enough to “hide” the cost
  3. More useable small crossovers with 200+ mile range on 2nd gen batteries
  4. Big @$$ pick ‘em up trucks with 100 kWh batteries, ‘cause ‘Murica
  5. High performance sports cars and exotics with 3rd gen, high power density batteries
Of course, Tesla operates outside of this cadence, because they just dove right in with large luxury sedans and worked their way down the value chain instead of up.

Right now we are witnessing the 3rd and 4th items playing out. The 5th item starts seeing product in the ‘25-‘26 timeframe.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 04:54 PM   #111
Martinjlm
Retired from GM
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnknownJinX View Post
....
But remember, no one cross-shops a Bolt or ID4 with a Camaro or Mustang. Not even a lot of people would cross-shop a Model 3 with a pony car. Different audience entirely.

Sent from toaster or something
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingHawk View Post
Agreed, I was surprised by him comparing them to a Camaro. No one would cross shop them but looking at it from value perspective you are getting more for your 40K going towards a Camaro SS. As I said, if there are EV equivalents to ICE affordable sports coupes/sedans/hatchbacks, then EV's would have a case and we can let free market decide. Problem is the market will not provide them until at least 2030, if even. However, government regulation may force us out of ICE sports vehicles before 2035, by various means mentioned by other posters here. And we will have to get one of these EV econoboxes instead of comparable ICE luxury sedan or sports cars.
I know one of the guys who broke the “Mustang going EV in ‘28” story. He traded his Chevy SS for a Tesla Model 3 Performance because...faster. Only one data point, but a really interesting data point.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline  
Old 02-03-2021, 05:09 PM   #112
RagingHawk
 
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :)
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinjlm View Post
I know one of the guys who broke the “Mustang going EV in ‘28” story. He traded his Chevy SS for a Tesla Model 3 Performance because...faster. Only one data point, but a really interesting data point.
To be honest when I think performance I think handling/sporty dynamics. It does not need always require mind boggling amounts of power. A Fiat 124 Spider is a more fun car to drive than anything Tesla makes. I don't consider anything Tesla offers to be a sports car. Putting more motors to have 1,000HP plus is a lazy approach to driving fun. It will make a lot of people barf thanks to the instant torque as well. There is no need for 1,200 hp ev cars, especially by a company like Tesla, except to kill the idea of what a sports car should be.

Tesla wants to kill sports car competition by making big numbers and wowing naive consumers who are involved in a ____ measuring contest. It will force other manufacturers to make comparable heavy straight line rockets and will kill any affordable sports cars in with other sporty characteristics like being light weight, small, balanced, etc..

I will pray for your friend , though. And anyone else who buys a Tesla.
RagingHawk is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.