[cornerspeed92]

I do believe we did land on the moon even though there have been many that say it was fake. I do however not trust the government and believe they do and would lie about this and everything....i mean look at whats her name....I was watching some stuff on Utube and one was a live feed on space/moon and i started thinking with the new and powerful telescopes we now have certainly they could be turned to the moon and pictures could be taken of the space module's just sitting there. Could you imagine what cool pic's those would be to see them sitting there.

[CFD]

I'm certain it happened because I watched it on tv and we all know everything on tv is real.

[cornerspeed92]

Originally Posted by CFD

I'm certain it happened because I watched it on tv and we all know everything on tv is real.

[rontammy0]

Go on Netflix and look for Unsealed Alien Files. Pretty interesting stuff

[ZED SLED]

I know it's true because John F. Kennedy said Americans would be on the moon before the decade of the '60s was over and he was a Democrat...errr...a...politician and therefore incapable of lying

[ChefBorOzzy]

[Rico]

This

[enzia35]

Anyone who denies we landed on the moon deserves to be Buzz Aldrin'd. (Knocked the f out)

[90503]

....And now for something completely different...:

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/obser...landing-sites/

[DenverTaco07]

The number of complicit conspirators would be in the tens of thousands.

But, with that said I do believe the earth is flat...BELIEVE ME, I'm an orange man who loves fascism and hates facts!

[SS/RS2010]

I do believe the pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock even though there have been many that say it was fake. I do however not trust the government and believe they do and would lie about this and everything...I mean look at whats his name...I was watching some stuff on Utube one was a live feed on Plymouth/Rock and I started thinking with the new and powerful time machines we have now certainly they could be turned to Plymouth Rock in the past and pictures could be taken of the Mayflower just sitting there. Could you imagine what cool pic's those would be to see the pilgrims standing there?

[Steve Dallas]

Originally Posted by cornerspeed92

I do believe we did land on the moon even though there have been many that say it was fake. I do however not trust the government and believe they do and would lie about this and everything....i mean look at whats her name....I was watching some stuff on Utube and one was a live feed on space/moon and i started thinking with the new and powerful telescopes we now have certainly they could be turned to the moon and pictures could be taken of the space module's just sitting there. Could you imagine what cool pic's those would be to see them sitting there.

Getting enough detail from Earth is not going to happen because our atmosphere fuzzes the details of the landing sites.

They have taken other pictures of the sites from space, such as from the Challenger.

Do some searching and you'll find several times we've turned the cameras on the many landing sites.

Here's one, for example:

http://www.space.com/14874-apollo-11...oon-photo.html



People that think it didn't happen are idiots.

[90503]

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/obser...landing-sites/

From the above web-site....there is a link to the LRO...

We all love dark moonless skies, but let's face it, the Moon's out two weeks a month. How can you ignore it? You've doubtless observed craters and mountain ranges*and probed for volcanic features like rills and domes. But here and there among the nooks and crannies, you'll find six of the most remarkable locales on the Moon — the Apollo landing sites. They're the only places where humanity has achieved one of its oldest dreams and "touched the stars".
As you're well aware, no telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings. The laws of optics define its limits.
Hubble's 94.5-inch mirror has a resolution of 0.024″ in ultraviolet light, which translates to 141 feet (43 meters)*at the Moon's distance. In visible light, it's*0.05″, or closer to 300 feet. Given that the largest piece of equipment left on the Moon after each mission was the 17.9-foot-high by 14-foot-wide Lunar Module, you can see the problem.
Did I say problem? No problem for NASA's*Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which can dip as low as 31 miles (50 km) from the lunar surface, close enough to image each landing site in remarkable detail.

[silentownage001]

Originally Posted by Steve Dallas

Getting enough detail from Earth is not going to happen because our atmosphere fuzzes the details of the landing sites.

They have taken other pictures of the sites from space, such as from the Challenger.

Do some searching and you'll find several times we've turned the cameras on the many landing sites.

Here's one, for example:

http://www.space.com/14874-apollo-11...oon-photo.html



People that think it didn't happen are idiots.

Not to mention if it was fake the Soviets would have been all over it to make America look bad.