Homepage Garage Wiki Register Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Technical Camaro Topics > Road Course/Track and Autocross


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2020, 01:41 PM   #43
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msquared View Post
I think the question remains: how do you know the car's geometry needs "corrections" just because you lower it slightly? And if so, what will you correct, and how will you know what to correct? Don't forget, if you increase the effective spindle height (which is what the "roll center correction" shims achieve), then that has other implications for geometry, such as where the RC moves and how quickly as the suspension compresses and rebounds. The existence of these parts implies that "RC correction" is needed, but has anybody really quantified that? Again, I don't think Chevy does anything to correct it for the different ride heights of the various Camaro models.
Good question, I have no idea, But if I had to guess I would think that changing one thing would generally mean changing something else to keep everything in balance. But I can’t prove that at all.

Yes there’s definitely trust that SPL knows what they are doing but I don’t think it’s a far-fetched assumption either.

They also said that their tension rods would give me the ability to increase caster, independently of camber, to somewhere between 8.5 And 9.5 which is what they claim a lot of guys tracking the Camaro are at. Apparently without this product the caster is tied to the camber which is why I am now at 7.6 up from my original 6.9 because I’ve increased the camber to -2.5
__________________

Last edited by GunMetalGrey; 11-20-2020 at 02:00 PM.
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 01:42 PM   #44
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by kropscamaro16 View Post
spl parts just announced they will be doing a black friday sale 20% off if anybody wants to grab some!
Excellent, Where did you see this? And what dates of the sale for? I don’t see it on their website

Is there a code or something?
__________________

Last edited by GunMetalGrey; 11-20-2020 at 02:00 PM.
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 01:44 PM   #45
kropscamaro16


 
kropscamaro16's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1ss camaro
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: huntington beach
Posts: 7,024
i saw it on facebook they said keep posted for more details
__________________
16 1SS NIGHTFALL GRAY METALLIC WITH NPP / YYZ SPRINGS/ AFE POWERSWAYBARS/ AFE POWER RACE INTAKE/EXHAUST AND HEADERS HRE FLOWFORM FF11 WHEELS /GOODYEAR SUPERCAR3S / BLACK BOWTIES/OEM SMOKED TAILS/GM FRONT LIP/DIODE DYNAMICS SMOKED SIDE MARKERS/LED LICENSE PLATE LIGHTS/OEM GM STRUT BAR/BODY MATCHES SS EMBLEMS/ CMS TUNE ON 91 OCTANE / ZZP BIG BRAKE KIT / MSD WIRES / SPL TOERODS WITH LOCKOUT
kropscamaro16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 01:45 PM   #46
TrackClub


 
TrackClub's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 4,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunMetalGrey View Post
Good question, I have no idea, But if I had to guess I would think that changing one thing would generally mean changing something else to keep everything in balance. But I canít prove that at all.

Yes thereís definitely trust that SPL knows what they are doing but I donít think itís a far-fetched assumption either.

Either way Iím willing to take the risk.
That would presume that they sell different control arms depending on how much the car is lowered. Id check with them this is indeed the case, lest you could go too far the other way and create a completely new mess geometry wise.
TrackClub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 02:12 PM   #47
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrackClub View Post
That would presume that they sell different control arms depending on how much the car is lowered. Id check with them this is indeed the case, lest you could go too far the other way and create a completely new mess geometry wise.
The arms are apparently adjustable depending on how much the car has been lowered.
He said he would send me and/or my alignment shop the specs on how much adjustment was needed.
__________________
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 02:35 PM   #48
TrackClub


 
TrackClub's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 4,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunMetalGrey View Post
The arms are apparently adjustable depending on how much the car has been lowered.
He said he would send me and/or my alignment shop the specs on how much adjustment was needed.
I suspected as much.
TrackClub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 04:40 PM   #49
Msquared
 
Drives: Chevrolet SS 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunMetalGrey View Post
Good question, I have no idea, But if I had to guess I would think that changing one thing would generally mean changing something else to keep everything in balance. But I can’t prove that at all.
OH, there's no question changing some things affects others. Ride height and RC are inextricably linked to one another, for example. That's not what I'm questioning. What I question is whether or not the RC needs to be corrected after a Camaro is lowered. I'm not aware of such a need, and Chevy obviously doesn't see one. That doesn't mean it wouldn't be a good idea. I'm just saying that we don't know.

Quote:
They also said that their tension rods would give me the ability to increase caster, independently of camber, to somewhere between 8.5 And 9.5 which is what they claim a lot of guys tracking the Camaro are at. Apparently without this product the caster is tied to the camber which is why I am now at 7.6 up from my original 6.9 because I’ve increased the camber to -2.5
Well, let's unpack this a bit. Caster isn't adjustable on a stock Camaro at all. At least some camber plates allow caster adjustability, like the Vorshlag units. But the two are independently adjustable. One can limit the other: for example at max camber on the plates you probably have to give up some caster, and vice versa. But within those limits you can absolutely set whatever caster and camber you want, independent from one another. I don't know what caster range the Vorshlag plates give you with no other mods: you might be able to get the 8.5-9.5 you want just from those.

Using the stock adjustment, I don't see how setting camber using the factory adjustment could change caster. That doesn't really make sense. On my 1LE, going from the as-delivered -1.4/-0.9 (left/right) camber to -2.7 on both sides using the stock camber adjustment didn't change my caster one single bit. It read 7.6 and 7.3 before and after the camber change. That's what we'd expect.

Also, it's not clear that normal alignment machines can accurately read caster or steering axis inclination because there is no single pivot point defined by a single lower ball joint. Instead, there are two ball joints (one for each link) and a virtual pivot point defined by their instant center. But the problem is that as the steering is turned, that virtual pivot point moves...a lot. We could define static caster using the virtual pivot point. However, an alignment machine infers caster from the change in camber as the steering is cycled through its range, and that would not be accurate for our cars because that pivot point is moving.

This all boils down to: I'd be interested to know the basis for measuring the caster that track drivers are using. I'd also be interested to know why more is better. Typically, the benefit of extreme caster only matter with extreme steering angles, such as autocross use. More than 7.5 or so is starting to get into the extreme range. So what benefit does 8.5-9.5 give on a road course?
__________________
Matt Miller
2020 SS 1LE
Msquared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 05:28 PM   #50
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msquared View Post
OH, there's no question changing some things affects others. Ride height and RC are inextricably linked to one another, for example. That's not what I'm questioning. What I question is whether or not the RC needs to be corrected after a Camaro is lowered. I'm not aware of such a need, and Chevy obviously doesn't see one. That doesn't mean it wouldn't be a good idea. I'm just saying that we don't know.
We agree on most of that, but I don't understand why you are saying Chevy does not see the need to adjust anything due to ride height.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Msquared View Post
Well, let's unpack this a bit. Caster isn't adjustable on a stock Camaro at all. At least some camber plates allow caster adjustability, like the Vorshlag units. But the two are independently adjustable. One can limit the other: for example at max camber on the plates you probably have to give up some caster, and vice versa. But within those limits you can absolutely set whatever caster and camber you want, independent from one another. I don't know what caster range the Vorshlag plates give you with no other mods: you might be able to get the 8.5-9.5 you want just from those.

Using the stock adjustment, I don't see how setting camber using the factory adjustment could change caster. That doesn't really make sense. On my 1LE, going from the as-delivered -1.4/-0.9 (left/right) camber to -2.7 on both sides using the stock camber adjustment didn't change my caster one single bit. It read 7.6 and 7.3 before and after the camber change. That's what we'd expect.

Also, it's not clear that normal alignment machines can accurately read caster or steering axis inclination because there is no single pivot point defined by a single lower ball joint. Instead, there are two ball joints (one for each link) and a virtual pivot point defined by their instant center. But the problem is that as the steering is turned, that virtual pivot point moves...a lot. We could define static caster using the virtual pivot point. However, an alignment machine infers caster from the change in camber as the steering is cycled through its range, and that would not be accurate for our cars because that pivot point is moving.

This all boils down to: I'd be interested to know the basis for measuring the caster that track drivers are using. I'd also be interested to know why more is better. Typically, the benefit of extreme caster only matter with extreme steering angles, such as autocross use. More than 7.5 or so is starting to get into the extreme range. So what benefit does 8.5-9.5 give on a road course?
Interesting, I'd like to know as well.
I'm quoting what the guy from SPL said, so I can't comment on whether or not he is right. My track has 19 turns in a 1 minute and 20 second lap so it is corner heavy and technical.

This could all be a waste of money but only one thing is for sure, he definitely wants mine!
__________________
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 06:25 PM   #51
TrackClub


 
TrackClub's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 4,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunMetalGrey View Post
We agree on most of that, but I don't understand why you are saying Chevy does not see the need to adjust anything due to ride height.



Interesting, I'd like to know as well.
I'm quoting what the guy from SPL said, so I can't comment on whether or not he is right. My track has 19 turns in a 1 minute and 20 second lap so it is corner heavy and technical.

This could all be a waste of money but only one thing is for sure, he definitely wants mine!
Please re read my post #30. "Some guy" telling you that "some track guys" run high caster without understanding just how fast they are in the first place and what other mods they may have in a second place is just plain noise best not to pay attention to.

PS GM sells a lowering kit for a non 1LE SS without any specs re changing caster.

PSS By design, the more caster the less responsive steering, the less responsive car = the more understeer.
No race cars run such high caster, unless they are mid/rear engine cars. To the contrary, they usually run less than our stock caster to make them as responsive as possible.
TrackClub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 06:33 PM   #52
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrackClub View Post

PS GM sells a lowering kit for a non 1LE SS without any specs re changing caster.

PSS By design, the more caster the less responsive steering, the less responsive car = the more understeer.
No race cars run such high caster, unless they are mid/rear engine cars. To the contrary, they usually run less than our stock caster to make them as responsive as possible.
Ah yes, good point!

And good to know! Thanks

They also offer a rear Toe lockout kit that apparently stops the alignment from getting out of whack and causing premature tire wear
__________________
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 06:41 PM   #53
kropscamaro16


 
kropscamaro16's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1ss camaro
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: huntington beach
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunMetalGrey View Post
Ah yes, good point!

And good to know! Thanks

They also offer a rear Toe lockout kit that apparently stops the alignment from getting out of whack and causing premature tire wear

thats the only spl part i have so far but will be getting more in future!
__________________
16 1SS NIGHTFALL GRAY METALLIC WITH NPP / YYZ SPRINGS/ AFE POWERSWAYBARS/ AFE POWER RACE INTAKE/EXHAUST AND HEADERS HRE FLOWFORM FF11 WHEELS /GOODYEAR SUPERCAR3S / BLACK BOWTIES/OEM SMOKED TAILS/GM FRONT LIP/DIODE DYNAMICS SMOKED SIDE MARKERS/LED LICENSE PLATE LIGHTS/OEM GM STRUT BAR/BODY MATCHES SS EMBLEMS/ CMS TUNE ON 91 OCTANE / ZZP BIG BRAKE KIT / MSD WIRES / SPL TOERODS WITH LOCKOUT
kropscamaro16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 09:18 PM   #54
Msquared
 
Drives: Chevrolet SS 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by GunMetalGrey View Post
We agree on most of that, but I don't understand why you are saying Chevy does not see the need to adjust anything due to ride height.
On this I was referring specifically to the spindle height and roll center. Chevy makes a range of ride heights on various trim levels of Camaros, and to my knowledge they don't do anything to correct the changes in RC that occur with the varying ride heights.
__________________
Matt Miller
2020 SS 1LE
Msquared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 09:56 PM   #55
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msquared View Post
On this I was referring specifically to the spindle height and roll center. Chevy makes a range of ride heights on various trim levels of Camaros, and to my knowledge they don't do anything to correct the changes in RC that occur with the varying ride heights.
Gotchya.

I also forgot they offered lowering kits from factory without roll centre correction.
__________________
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 09:57 PM   #56
GunMetalGrey

 
GunMetalGrey's Avatar
 
Drives: Modified 2018 Camaro ZL1 (a10)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 918
Quote:
Originally Posted by kropscamaro16 View Post
thats the only spl part i have so far but will be getting more in future!
I will be getting the front lower control arms so that I can increase camber. That’s the only part I’m getting for sure
__________________
GunMetalGrey is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.