01-15-2019, 10:43 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2020 LT1 Black Join Date: May 2013
Location: MO
Posts: 562
|
355 HP 3LT V6
This is according to Chevy's website. I didn't know they bumped up the horsepower in the 6...
https://www.chevrolet.com/performanc...and-price/trim |
01-15-2019, 11:24 PM | #2 | |
Yee-aay-ee!
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS CV CE Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ORegon
Posts: 2,520
|
Quote:
https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=533693
__________________
|
|
01-15-2019, 11:55 PM | #3 | |
Banned
Drives: 2017 Super Sport Cam. Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: US
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
I think its a misprint and is 335. |
|
01-15-2019, 11:58 PM | #4 | |
Banned
Drives: 2017 Super Sport Cam. Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: US
Posts: 893
|
Quote:
Sloppy mistake on GMs marketing....its a mistake on their own website. Must not have any proof readers.....sad. Model: 2019 Chevrolet Camaro MSRP: $26,995 MPG: 16 city / 27 highway Horsepower: 335 hp @ 6,800 rpm Engine: 3.6 L V6 Curb weight: 3,354 lbs Transmission: 6-speed manual Torque: 284 lb-ft @ 5,300 rpm |
|
01-16-2019, 12:55 AM | #5 | |
Yee-aay-ee!
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS CV CE Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ORegon
Posts: 2,520
|
Quote:
The data you obtained has the incorrect weight. That's the 2.0T weight.
__________________
|
|
01-16-2019, 05:55 AM | #6 | |
Drives: Too many to list Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Coast Runner
Posts: 878
|
355 HP 3LT V6
Quote:
It’s incorrect. What was discussed in the thread you posted was a video of a dealership employee rattling off specs on the 2019s and getting his numbers wrong. Everyone else that chimes into that thread indicated as much. Motor Trend on the 2019s The rear-drive 2019 Camaro’s base engine is a 2.0-liter turbo-four that makes 275 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque. The four-cylinder Camaro is available with a standard six-speed manual delivering an EPA-rated 20/30 mpg city/highway or an optional eight-speed automatic (22/31 mpg). The available 3.6-liter V-6 (availability begins on the 1LT trim) is rated at 335 hp and 284 lb-ft and delivers 16/27 mpg with the six-speed manual and 19/29 mpg with the eight-speed automatic. Powering the SS is a 455-hp, 455-lb-ft 6.2-liter V-8 that is rated at 16/24 mpg with the six-speed manual and 16/27 mpg with the 10-speed automatic. A supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 that pumps out 650 hp and 650 lb-ft powers the Camaro ZL1 and is rated at 14/20 mpg with the six-speed manual and 13/21 mpg with the 10-speed. Car and Driver on the 2019s Every Camaro SS features Chevy's iconic small-block V-8, with 455 horsepower and 455 lb-ft of torque. Its linear power delivery and chest-compressing acceleration are enhanced by the optional dual-mode exhaust, which erupts with a sharp bark at startup and thunderous sounds during wide-open-throttle blasts. The standard six-speed manual transmission maintains the enthusiast spirit, and the two automatic transmissions snap off swift shifts. The base 275-hp four-cylinder isn't slow—we tested a manual model that made it to 60 mph in an earnest 5.1 seconds. But uneven throttle responses and unpleasant, unsporting sounds accompanied its dull demeanor. On the other hand, upgrading to the 335-hp naturally aspirated V-6 completely changes the car's character. The gutsy V-6 has its own distinctly searing soundtrack and redeems generations of ho-hum six-cylinders. Chevrolet Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
01-16-2019, 06:48 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2018 SS 1LE Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 229
|
It's pretty pathetic that after 10 years the Subaru STI a $40,000 base (305hp) is getting out worked by a LT trim Camaro!
You know throw a 1LE package on this platform and you have the ultimate affordable daily, track car. This year Subaru is bringing over the S206 model which final gives them 345hp and yet I still believe the LT1LE Maro will send it to school! |
01-16-2019, 07:00 AM | #8 |
Banned
Drives: Camaro Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 215
|
What's even more sad is the new Supra, Toyotas new flagship sports car makes the same 335hp out of a turbo 6 cylinder.
|
01-16-2019, 07:25 AM | #9 | |
Drives: 2017 SS A8 Hyper Blue/White Stripes Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Arlington, TN.
Posts: 1,874
|
Quote:
I would expect that comment from a L99 owner...LOL
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS Hyper Blue
2011 Camaro 2SS 2004 Corvette CE SOLD |
|
01-16-2019, 07:45 AM | #10 | |
Retired from GM
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,228
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack | |
|
01-16-2019, 07:56 AM | #11 |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
The LGX is an absolutely killer engine. I miss mine quite a bit.
In this car I wouldn't even look at any other engine the weight and handling and performance was top-notch. I'm a guy that loves the V8 but in my opinion don't pay the extra money for it in the 6th gen Camaro. Just make sure you get the NPP exhaust |
01-16-2019, 08:26 AM | #12 |
Yee-aay-ee!
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS CV CE Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ORegon
Posts: 2,520
|
Even more more sad is that it's not even a true Supra but simply a reskinned Z4.
__________________
|
01-16-2019, 08:29 AM | #13 |
Yee-aay-ee!
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS CV CE Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ORegon
Posts: 2,520
|
I wasn't bashing it.
__________________
|
01-16-2019, 09:49 AM | #14 |
Drives: Gone: 2017 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 111
|
It's also about power under the curve. Keep in mind the Z4 which is the same car with a higher boost version of the same engine makes 382hp and has acceleration pretty close to the 455hp Camaro. They also have significantly better fuel economy. I'm not necessarily saying I prefer that type of engine, but there is a counter perspective.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|