[WiggyB]

Originally Posted by laynlo15

Nice progress.

Thanks....... only thing I'm worried about is when I rev the engine to see if final pulse width moves I don't get any response from it. I have rev'd as high as 3500rpm. I did set my port start frequency to 8000 not sure if that has anything to do with it. Watching the video Mike made he only rev'd to 2300rpm and got results from it.

[WiggyB]

Originally Posted by WiggyB

Thanks....... only thing I'm worried about is when I rev the engine to see if final pulse width moves I don't get any response from it. I have rev'd as high as 3500rpm. I did set my port start frequency to 8000 not sure if that has anything to do with it. Watching the video Mike made he only rev'd to 2300rpm and got results from it.

So I went in today and put the port start frequency to 6000 and the percentage to 30. I went with the recommended settings to see if I would get a signal on final pulse width but still nothing. Anyone have any ideas?

[Megahurtz]

Originally Posted by WiggyB

So I went in today and put the port start frequency to 6000 and the percentage to 30. I went with the recommended settings to see if I would get a signal on final pulse width but still nothing. Anyone have any ideas?

Yes, consult your tuner. I just sent you an email with the reason it wasn't firing and a new bin file.



But if anyone reading this wants to know why, the MAF Axis needed to be updated in the Reflex System. The MAF calculator spreadsheet doesn't have any data below 7950 Hz. I'm guessing the spreadsheet isn't updating the Axis points when you changed the start frequency line.

[WiggyB]

Originally Posted by Megahurtz

Yes, consult your tuner. I just sent you an email with the reason it wasn't firing and a new bin file.



But if anyone reading this wants to know why, the MAF Axis needed to be updated in the Reflex System. The MAF calculator spreadsheet doesn't have any data below 7950 Hz. I'm guessing the spreadsheet isn't updating the Axis points when you changed the start frequency line.

You got me there.........

[KingLT1]

Nice to see it all coming together... Also glad to see Jason was willing to tune it for you!!

[WiggyB]

Originally Posted by KingLT1

Nice to see it all coming together... Also glad to see Jason was willing to tune it for you!!

Thanks for the referral great guy to work with. Very patient with my lack of tuning knowledge and I'm learning a lot from him along the way.

[cjperformance]

I'm interested in knowing where you guys landed with the lamda feedback settings in the Reflex. I didn't have much opportunity to play with those settings. Hopefully I'll have more time in the spring than i did this fall.

I havent found a great description of exactly what all the lambda feedback settings do, so ive kept kept them close to the defaults that Mike gave me.

[Megahurtz]

Originally Posted by cjperformance

I'm interested in knowing where you guys landed with the lamda feedback settings in the Reflex. I didn't have much opportunity to play with those settings. Hopefully I'll have more time in the spring than i did this fall.

I havent found a great description of exactly what all the lambda feedback settings do, so ive kept kept them close to the defaults that Mike gave me.

I forgot the settings but started with the standard settings that it came with and had to turn up the correction factor. It's best to get the car tuned without it enabled and then turn it on and target a lambda. I think we are going to enable it for WiggyB once he gets the wideband feedback in place. Ultimately you don't want it to have to do a lot of correction.

[WiggyB]

Originally Posted by cjperformance

I'm interested in knowing where you guys landed with the lamda feedback settings in the Reflex. I didn't have much opportunity to play with those settings. Hopefully I'll have more time in the spring than i did this fall.

I havent found a great description of exactly what all the lambda feedback settings do, so ive kept kept them close to the defaults that Mike gave me.

What did you use for the 5vs? I've been looking but haven't found anything close to the brain. I was honestly going to ping Mike for his math since in the video he made he said he used the same wideband I'm using the innovative LC2. Trying to make it as simple as possible.

[cjperformance]

Originally Posted by Megahurtz

I forgot the settings but started with the standard settings that it came with and had to turn up the correction factor. It's best to get the car tuned without it enabled and then turn it on and target a lambda. I think we are going to enable it for WiggyB once he gets the wideband feedback in place. Ultimately you don't want it to have to do a lot of correction.

That makes sense, i need to turn it off and adjust the tune w/o lamdba adjustments. The lamda stuff was making corrections and obfuscating the real effect of some of my changes. With it off, i know it will be on the rich side. It always removes fuel the way i currently have it.

[cjperformance]

Originally Posted by WiggyB

What did you use for the 5vs? I've been looking but haven't found anything close to the brain. I was honestly going to ping Mike for his math since in the video he made he said he used the same wideband I'm using the innovative LC2. Trying to make it as simple as possible.

I assume you are referring to the 0-5v signal for lamda feedback? I used the 0-5v output that comes off my AEM gauge.

If i recall, theres also a gaugeless variant of the O2 that may or may not have a 5v signal. I remember thinking about using it for something, but not sure if it had the 0-5v output.

[WiggyB]

Originally Posted by cjperformance

I assume you are referring to the 0-5v signal for lamda feedback? I used the 0-5v output that comes off my AEM gauge.

If I recall, there's also a gaugeless variant of the O2 that may or may not have a 5v signal. I remember thinking about using it for something, but not sure if it had the 0-5v output.

I didn't think about that and I believe there's one coming off my P3 gauge. I'm going to double check that and make it work.

[WiggyB]

Been a while since I've updated the thread but I must say it was my fault. Tried to save a few bucks and couldn't get the innovative wb to work so like everyone suggested went with the AEM. The innovative was constantly reading lean so kept adding fuel but the AEM told the truth. Jason is killing it now and getting it right. Still a little rich but he'll get it there. Honestly I'm learning a lot but man am I impressed. She's pulling like a beast and even hit 10psi of boost most I saw before was 9.5.

Everyone has always told me fuel-fuel-fuel........... and man ain't that the truth. Here are 2 pics to show some number from the last log taken.

I haven't been nervous after a pull in a long time. Tonight I got it back.

[laynlo15]

Man you are making progress, the port/Reflex is a great mod and its so hard to beat for the price and what you can gain in power that kinda blows your mind on how much power it can make. I was thinking back that my car with a Lt2 intake, 95mm TB and Rotofab CAI made 434/444 if I remember correctly. Then remembering back to when we added a 2300 to my 16ss that car made 549 on 93 octane, so my 22 would have made about the same. From 434 rwhp to 707 rwhp with just the 2300 and Toohighpsi PI is pretty incredible on a stock fuel system, stock motor, exhaust, etc on E65 on just 11 psi of boost. How can you go wrong? So, the port injection with tuning and going to E65 added another 158 rwhp for under 3000 bucks. Why would you choose a more expensive kit, plus Mike is working on new additions to the Reflex in the near future. Impressed? I would think so.