You are browsing camaro6 
11-21-2016, 02:31 PM
|
#15 | |
   Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 03:12 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
  |
Mitsubishi bringing the heat with a bolt on turbo upgrade.
Quote:
If I wanted to run one bad enough I would make the parts needed to make it work.  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 04:05 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 04:58 PM
|
#18 |
   Drives: camaro Join Date: May 2013
Location: Stony Brook,NY
Posts: 1,756
|
Too bad the car is ugly as $hit. I wouldn't want that car if it were 700 HP.
__________________
2016 2SS,A8,NAV,NPP,MAG Ride,Sunroof
Hyperblue/JetBlack  |
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 05:24 PM
|
#19 | |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Quote:
This is true, for Joe public, this may be a great upgrade. But I'd really want to see some hard info and Dyno tests before plopping the extra cash down on it vs a modified stock turbo. It would have to be vastly better to justify the extra cost (at least to me)... The other thing to keep in mind is that USUALLY the stock modified turbos are rebuilt with better internals than the stock MHI turbos. I would guess that this new MHI "upgraded" turbo will still just have standard MHI internals. Of course this is assuming the pricing will me similar to the Evo/Subaru specific turbo (~1600)... It would be fantastic if they could/would offer this for $1000-1200. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 06:24 PM
|
#20 |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Anyone else actually look at the spec sheet in the video?
They claim max allowable boost for the stock turbo is 17, but people stock most people are seeing 19-21. People with a tune are pushing them to ~24+. Says the new turbo is good to 29psi... I'm guessing that means it can be pushed to 35+ pretty easy? Max RPM of the new turbo is 150k, where as the stock turbo is 175k. I would think the machined wheel of the new turbo would be ok with higher rpms. |
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 06:25 PM
|
#21 | |
|
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 08:20 PM
|
#22 | |
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro RS 1LT 2.0L Turbo Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
350 turbine and billet wheel 150 balancing 100 rebuild kit 150 labor = 1050$cad + tax. He can also upgrade parts on that new 18k. For the price of the work on our Stock turbo. And a downpipe and tune...that would be the fastest route to go fast I'd say?
__________________
'16 1LT 2.0T RS - Catless DP, Intake, Tune/ Eibach springs FE3 shocks/ BMR front bar FE4 rear bar/ Xpel'd front end, CP Reload sealed/ Radenso Pro M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 08:34 PM
|
#23 | |
|
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
Yes, that would be the quickest way to get your car moving faster. Tuning will be the issue then. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 08:55 PM
|
#24 |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Not bad. I would like to throw out that bigger isn't always better though, especially on the turbine side you can go too big in the stock housing and actually start losing performance.
Sounds like we're going to have some fast cars on the board in the future. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 10:41 PM
|
#25 |
|
Drives: 2016 Camaro RS 1LT 2.0L Turbo Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 349
|
I hear ya on the turbine side. I feel like GM engineered the LTG so that the timing. Turbo size. Head flow all match together. I'd like to hope that's what they did lol.
I rather have a larger compressor side than what we have. And only slightly larger turbine side. More midrange and a bit more high end.
__________________
'16 1LT 2.0T RS - Catless DP, Intake, Tune/ Eibach springs FE3 shocks/ BMR front bar FE4 rear bar/ Xpel'd front end, CP Reload sealed/ Radenso Pro M.
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2016, 11:11 PM
|
#26 | |
  
Drives: 2016 Hyper Blue 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: hampton roads
Posts: 2,763
|
Quote:
__________________
1ss/Auto-Hyper Blue
acs carbon flash spoiler, bmr springs, gm clear tails. Texas speed cam, 223/227 .635/.635 116 LSA, Kooks Long Tube Headers with green cats, MSD Atomic Air Force Intake, CAI Cold Air Intake, QTP cutouts. 503 hp Best so far 11.5 at 123 with a 1.83 60ft. BMR lower and upper trailing arms and upper control arms,E85 DELIVERED 12/29/15 http://youtube.com/bybcous " no talking only racing on my youtube" |
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2016, 12:25 AM
|
#27 | |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Quote:
Perhaps. There isn't a lot of timing advance in the top end at all, I was really surprised. I still think there is quite a bit to be gained just from porting the compressor housing, even if the stock compressor wheel is left alone. It is really choked down in the housing, I can barely get a finger in the outlet of the compressor housing before porting. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2016, 02:09 PM
|
#28 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
Quote:
 Those efr turbos are wickedly bada$$ efficient... Its the route I'll go eventually 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
