Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-20-2024, 08:35 AM   #57
Nimair.ZL1
 
Drives: 2023 Chevy Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Houston
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnyBoy View Post
Whats the power level on that?
I would say close to 750-775ish with the setup mentioned above. I know that close to 850 RWHP the high side starts dropping off.
Nimair.ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2024, 09:06 AM   #58
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnyBoy View Post
Whats the power level on that?
About 700-720whp.

Just to clarify, 850whp is what the high side falls off on 93 pump gas, Not E85. Full E85 it's falling off in the 700whp range even with a bigger cam lobe. This is why we blend, because we can get 90% of the gains on E50-E60 vs E85 and the fuel system will go much further. On most builds E50-E60 is plenty of octane(103-106).
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2024, 09:11 AM   #59
BunnyBoy
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: SD
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Just to clarify so the person you quoted isn't confused, 850whp is what the high side falls off on 93 pump gas, Not E85. Full E85 it's falling off in the 700whp range even with a bigger cam lobe. This is why we blend, because we can get 90% of the gains on E50-E60 vs E85 and the fuel system will go much further. On most builds E50-E60 is plenty of octane(103-106).

The BMW crowd does the same thing. It's the nature of DI only engines.



About 700-720whp.

If you go E50 and up the boost with upgraded low side how much more does it pump it up then?
BunnyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 08:05 AM   #60
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnyBoy View Post
If you go E50 and up the boost with upgraded low side how much more does it pump it up then?
roughly 80whp...
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 08:20 AM   #61
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by CW3SF View Post
Flex fuel is the easiest mod to install that I’ve done on my car.
Damn, you convinced me. I think I'll buy a kit today and put some E in it.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 08:48 AM   #62
BunnyBoy
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: SD
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
roughly 80whp...

Thank you for this info.
BunnyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 09:15 AM   #63
Bird71
 
Drives: '23 Camaro ZL1 A10 / '23 Blazer RS
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
Damn, you convinced me. I think I'll buy a kit today and put some E in it.
JSH/King,
So are there any other downsides to using E besides it's fuel consumption and extra $$ to install?
__________________
2023 Camaro ZL1 A10
Riverside Blue Coupe

1/16/23 - 1100
4/20/23 - 2000
5/08/23 - 3000 (TPW-5/22)
5/12/23 - 3400
6/01/23 - 4150
6/05/23 - 5000
6/07/23 - 6000
Bird71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 10:14 AM   #64
IMCWORTH
 
IMCWORTH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro Convertible ZL1 A10
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: CA
Posts: 146
I have these octane levels available to me would e85 still be necessary for someone who doesn't race
Attached Images
 
IMCWORTH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 10:59 AM   #65
ZL14ever
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
Damn, you convinced me. I think I'll buy a kit today and put some E in it.
You'll need port injection to run a meaningful amount of E in your setup, unless you back down on upper pulley size. My C7 has a similar setup with port injection and fuel is tapped out at E50 (mainly due to flow limit of DSX external pump)
ZL14ever is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 01:53 PM   #66
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by IMCWORTH View Post
I have these octane levels available to me would e85 still be necessary for someone who doesn't race
Not necessary per se, but it'd give you higher octane than that 101 even with a blend for 1/3-1/4 the price, and that's just one of the advantages stated here and in many of KingLT1's posts in other threads.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 02:09 PM   #67
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZL14ever View Post
You'll need port injection to run a meaningful amount of E in your setup, unless you back down on upper pulley size. My C7 has a similar setup with port injection and fuel is tapped out at E50 (mainly due to flow limit of DSX external pump)
Yeah, I was being sarcastic. I'd need a BBFP, 65+ injectors (or larger), larger fuel lines, the E kit, etc, etc.

It's simpler for me to use MS109 at the track, although 5 gal. is $125
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 02:58 PM   #68
IMCWORTH
 
IMCWORTH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro Convertible ZL1 A10
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: CA
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
Not necessary per se, but it'd give you higher octane than that 101 even with a blend for 1/3-1/4 the price, and that's just one of the advantages stated here and in many of KingLT1's posts in other threads.
My problem is I live in California E85 Is available all over the place but the problem I’m having is I would need a tune and with a tune I can’t smog.

California Dreaming
IMCWORTH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2024, 06:44 PM   #69
NicKey
 
NicKey's Avatar
 
Drives: Nickey Super Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Loves Park, Illinois
Posts: 1,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Megahurtz View Post
E35 on the stock fuel system with a Kong X port, a 2.3 upper and cold weather is not well below the limit of the stock fuel system. I tune a lot of these cars with Flex Fuel. Unless you live somewhere in a high altitude zone, you're already on the edge with E35 in decent weather. Let it get cold and the demand goes way up and the fuel pressures will fall off a cliff. It's not a gradual drop when you're on the edge, its more like falling off the cliff.

I could be wrong, I wasn't there. But if I had to bet, I would still bet a loss of fuel pressure was the cause. I only offer the advice so that you don't make the same mistake twice.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Katech_Mike View Post
I agree with this.

Also why I'm not a fan of running blends. They really need to be baby sat and most of my customers do not want the hassle of consistently logging.
We agree as well!
NicKey is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.