You are browsing camaro6 
06-28-2018, 05:31 PM
|
#1 |
Drives: Several... Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York-South Florida
Posts: 443
|
Redline Motorsports TVS2650 vs TVS1700 shoot out
So we recently did some independent testing with Edelbrock Superchargers using there new TVS2650 supercharger and stacked it against the OEM TVS1700. As to be expected it performed very well. Much larger case and superior cooling system contributed to the gains. The test was performed on a prior built ZL1 10 speed car we had completed almost a year ago. The car had our PHASE 3 Performance package which kept the factory 1700. I'm sure it will be asked why didn't we do this on a stock LT4 and the answer is we wanted to see this blower work under modified conditions. Its safe to say it clearly out performs the factory blower so an increase is evident.
Here is the formal write up on the swap... https://www.lsxmag.com/tech-stories/...rger-on-a-zl1/ Redline Motorsports-HT Last edited by Redline Motorsports; 06-28-2018 at 05:43 PM. |
|
|
|
06-28-2018, 08:31 PM
|
#2 |
 Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: FW TX
Posts: 384
|
Nice. How did you get keep the A/F ratios happy on the stock fuel system (if stock)? By running meth?
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2018, 10:03 AM
|
#3 |
|
Hot Dog
Drives: '17 1SS 1LE Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,937
|
70 wHP and 40 LbFt on the same boost tells the story; the 2650 is clearly a more efficient match for the 6.2L.
__________________
2017 "M1SS1LE" in Hyper Blue w/PDR
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2018, 10:15 AM
|
#4 |
 Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 114
|
What I would love to see is a dyno comparison on a modified motor between the TVS 2650 and 2.9L Whipple.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2018, 11:09 AM
|
#5 |
|
Dyno Show Queen LOL
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,345
|
yes Modified whipple vs modified eforce lets see if the claims of are true more flow from a 2650 vs 2.9.. Then stock zl1 with pulleys vs the 2650 setup..
Redline.... Is this going to be a easy swap pull the LT4 1700 off and add the eforce and all the plumbing plugs and just some extensions or harness for the electronics? or we talking changing damper, tensioners, and other stuff?
__________________
 Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber |
|
|
|
|
06-29-2018, 11:20 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
I suspect the 2650 will make more torque, but the HP numbers should be about the same. I would also love to see a comparison on manifold intake temps at the same elevated power levels. Eventually we're going to see these back-to-back comparisons, and I can't wait. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2018, 02:07 PM
|
#7 |
 Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: London
Posts: 38
|
Cooling bricks on stock blower are small.
I have always been obsessed about intake air temps... Whipple has larger coolers than stock, but that one is even larger!Really interesting! |
|
|
|
|
06-29-2018, 02:27 PM
|
#8 |
     Drives: 18 ZL1 nightfall grey A10 Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: RGV Texas
Posts: 1,527
|
What’s the price difference between the Whipple 2.9 and the eforce 2650? What would be fuel requirements if any? Which is easier to install?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
