Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2019, 10:49 PM   #29
steelheadrob
Tactical Garage
 
steelheadrob's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Idaho
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Also you might need to change those switches highlighted in red(refer to the pic) if you have voltage/fuel pressure fluctuations due to the variable rate charging system. changing those will keep the voltage to the FSCM more consistent. Factory is set to 11.6v minimum, I bumped my Camaro and the Vette to 12.5, maximum voltage is 14.0, but you can do 14.6.

Credit to BlueCamaro6!!
I did one quick before and after changing to 15.5 test pull yesterday. I saw a slight improvement but not that dramatic. I will bump the min and max up and trying increasing from 15.5 to 16 this next weekend when I have more time for testing.
steelheadrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2019, 10:08 PM   #30
steelheadrob
Tactical Garage
 
steelheadrob's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Idaho
Posts: 427
In logging the control module voltage at the stock 14.7 fuel minimum voltage setting I am seeing 13.4 for control module voltage. When I increased the fuel min voltage to 15.5 the control module voltage increased to 14.3. I will bump the fuel min volt to 16.5 and log the control module voltage to see where it goes to.

For the guys that have installed the BAP, what are you seeing for control module voltage? 17.5 volts?
steelheadrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2019, 07:02 AM   #31
Dysan911

 
Dysan911's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 50th Anniversary 2SS
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 930
Odd. I'm only seeing 13.70 on my Control Module with the BAP in my HPTuners log. Should that be over 17 volts or is that something that Data logging is not going to pick up?
__________________
Former Ride: 17 Camaro 2SS, M6 - Fifty | Procharger P1SC | 3.7 Pulley | Stage 2 IC | Race Bypass | DSX FF Kit | JRE Custom E85 Flex Fuel Tune | LT4 Fuel System | JMS Voltage Booster | MSD Plug Wires | American Racing 1-7/8's LT Headers Full System Catback | Baro Breakout Harness | LT4 Map Sensor | Katech Ported TB | MMS Oil Catch Can | 160 Thermo | Solo Performance J-Pipes

Dysan911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2019, 07:43 AM   #32
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelheadrob View Post
In logging the control module voltage at the stock 14.7 fuel minimum voltage setting I am seeing 13.4 for control module voltage. When I increased the fuel min voltage to 15.5 the control module voltage increased to 14.3. I will bump the fuel min volt to 16.5 and log the control module voltage to see where it goes to.

For the guys that have installed the BAP, what are you seeing for control module voltage? 17.5 volts?
I haven't logged mine, but my assumption is you won't see it change at the control module because I believe the JMS taps the wire going to the fuel pump.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2019, 01:34 PM   #33
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
Has anyone had any luck being able to license the FPCM in a 1LE car? All I see is the CCM module, there is no FPCM when I try to read anything. I am on a Jannetty tune as well using a JMS BAP in the mean time but am limited to E40. I am tackling the HPFP fuel line next as I have read that line has an orifice in it that was cause all sorts of issues with the HPFP fuel pressure dropping.

Also has anyone replaced the HPFP fuel line under the intake with the one that doesnt have an orifice in the line?
__________________
2019 Corvette Z06 2LZ A8 - Halltech CAI, AWE non-catted X-pipe, Mamo V2 ported TB 592rwhp, bone stock 566rwhp

2017 Camaro SS 1LE - Procharger D1SC w/ Tial 2" BOV & Race intercooler / ARH full length catless headers / Alky meth injection system - 650rwhp on conservative tune SOLD
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2019, 09:06 PM   #34
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJay74 View Post
I am tackling the HPFP fuel line next as I have read that line has an orifice in it that was cause all sorts of issues with the HPFP fuel pressure dropping.

Also has anyone replaced the HPFP fuel line under the intake with the one that doesnt have an orifice in the line?
Is this orifice on the discharge side of the HPFP? If so, I suspect you cannot run without one. It is likely there to keep the fuel pressure very high (by restricting the volume), but I wonder if a small upsize to the orifice could be made. That would allow the setup to flow more fuel but still function as intended. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable about this setup will chime in.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2019, 09:31 AM   #35
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
Is this orifice on the discharge side of the HPFP? If so, I suspect you cannot run without one. It is likely there to keep the fuel pressure very high (by restricting the volume), but I wonder if a small upsize to the orifice could be made. That would allow the setup to flow more fuel but still function as intended. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable about this setup will chime in.
No, this orifice is on the inlet side of the HPFP.
__________________
2019 Corvette Z06 2LZ A8 - Halltech CAI, AWE non-catted X-pipe, Mamo V2 ported TB 592rwhp, bone stock 566rwhp

2017 Camaro SS 1LE - Procharger D1SC w/ Tial 2" BOV & Race intercooler / ARH full length catless headers / Alky meth injection system - 650rwhp on conservative tune SOLD
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2019, 10:00 AM   #36
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJay74 View Post
Has anyone had any luck being able to license the FPCM in a 1LE car? All I see is the CCM module, there is no FPCM when I try to read anything. I am on a Jannetty tune as well using a JMS BAP in the mean time but am limited to E40. I am tackling the HPFP fuel line next as I have read that line has an orifice in it that was cause all sorts of issues with the HPFP fuel pressure dropping.

Also has anyone replaced the HPFP fuel line under the intake with the one that doesnt have an orifice in the line?
We carry the line with no orifice in stock and add them to all of our builds in house as they might need a little tweaking to get them to fit.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2019, 01:27 AM   #37
ADstranger
 
Drives: Chevy corvette
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UAE
Posts: 7
Anyone tried upping the voltage through the tune with good results?
ADstranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2019, 07:27 AM   #38
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADstranger View Post
Anyone tried upping the voltage through the tune with good results?
We do that in conjunction with the JMS but it will never provide the additional fuel a JMS does.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 02:26 PM   #39
ADstranger
 
Drives: Chevy corvette
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UAE
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
We do that in conjunction with the JMS but it will never provide the additional fuel a JMS does.
Will the extra voltage reduce the life of the pump? Also, what power level can the JMS support, 93 oct??
ADstranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 03:39 PM   #40
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADstranger View Post
Will the extra voltage reduce the life of the pump? Also, what power level can the JMS support, 93 oct??
Absolutely NOT.

That depends on what pump and injectors we are talking about,
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2019, 05:46 AM   #41
ADstranger
 
Drives: Chevy corvette
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UAE
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
Absolutely NOT.

That depends on what pump and injectors we are talking about,
Would you say all available BAPs are of the same quality? JMS, MSD and the KB ? Durability and ease of dialing in??
ADstranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:22 AM   #42
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADstranger View Post
Would you say all available BAPs are of the same quality? JMS, MSD and the KB ? Durability and ease of dialing in??
We feel the JMS is far superior to others, the reason why we choose to sell them and use them in all of our builds.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.