Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V6 LGX Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2016, 08:20 PM   #57
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
I'm shelving this project as well as the LGX ported tb and LFX ported intake manifold. I just don't have the time to devote to them right now, and won't any time soon.

Sorry guys.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2016, 10:50 PM   #58
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
Since our buddy Jason has defected to the turbo 4 camp, if it would be wonderful if the filler epoxy material could be listed so some of us could try a diy pass at our neglected intake manifold.

Also the odd 'silencer' protrusion in the intake manifold exists in the intake air bridge before the maf sensor. I assumed it helped straighten the air flow. Has anyone removed this other protrusion without negative effect?
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2016, 12:11 PM   #59
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
Since our buddy Jason has defected to the turbo 4 camp, if it would be wonderful if the filler epoxy material could be listed so some of us could try a diy pass at our neglected intake manifold.

Also the odd 'silencer' protrusion in the intake manifold exists in the intake air bridge before the maf sensor. I assumed it helped straighten the air flow. Has anyone removed this other protrusion without negative effect?
The only sensor that I know of in the LGX intake manifold is the MAP sensor, The MAF sensor is in the tubular section of the airbox lid. Removing the protrusions will not effect MAF sensor operation.

I use a Polyurethane filler material. It's been working for years with no failure or ill effects from gasoline/oil getting on it. There are several different brands out there that are readily available to the everyday consumer. It's absolutely possible to do it yourself but have patience and think about what you are doing. It's really a pain in the ass with the filler on the LGX intake.

I will say that just by removing the huricane generator (protrusions) I saw about a 10% airflow increase. I had planned on trying an intake with just the protrusions removed on the dyno, between the bone stock intake, and fully ported intake just to see what kind of difference it made.


That said, I currently have 1 brand new LGX intake manifold I'd let go of if anyone is interested and would like to try their hand on a spare intake manifold... But I have a feeling the only way anyone is going to want it is if I port it...
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2016, 12:52 PM   #60
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
The only sensor that I know of in the LGX intake manifold is the MAP sensor, The MAF sensor is in the tubular section of the airbox lid. Removing the protrusions will not effect MAF sensor operation.

I use a Polyurethane filler material. It's been working for years with no failure or ill effects from gasoline/oil getting on it. There are several different brands out there that are readily available to the everyday consumer. It's absolutely possible to do it yourself but have patience and think about what you are doing. It's really a pain in the ass with the filler on the LGX intake.

I will say that just by removing the huricane generator (protrusions) I saw about a 10% airflow increase. I had planned on trying an intake with just the protrusions removed on the dyno, between the bone stock intake, and fully ported intake just to see what kind of difference it made.


That said, I currently have 1 brand new LGX intake manifold I'd let go of if anyone is interested and would like to try their hand on a spare intake manifold... But I have a feeling the only way anyone is going to want it is if I port it...

Yea, I was referring to the one in the tubular section by the filter box since you had said you'd been removing the ones at the intake manifold since working on the lfx and had no problems. I didn't want to cause an issue with bad readings if the thing served some kind of air straightening purpose on the maf side.

Looks like i'll be cutting those off then.

Nice friday evening project.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2016, 09:34 PM   #61
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
I removed the silencers or whatever they are from the intake manifold.

Easiest way I could think of was to melt them off since I didn't have any snips small and strong enough to clip them.

Driving around I can't really say there has been any change in performance or sound. I need to find a nice non-traffic-y time on a 60mph road (there are some nearby) to go 0-60 and compare to my current record of 5.4 seconds. Honestly I can't judge any sound effects removing them may have had because my mrt v1 exhaust completely drowns out any kind of intake whistling that may be occurring.

I did notice that the K&N dropin that has about 5k miles on them now was decently dirty and so i swappped in my other K&N dropin. I'd recommend replacing (cleaning) cotton gauze filters twice as often as your paper ones as the benefits of the flow-rate diminish exponentially as the filter becomes dirty vs the linear flow rate effect of paper filters.

I have not yet tried filling in the intake manifold.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2016, 11:08 PM   #62
PolynesianPowerhouse
Big Samoan ina little car
 
PolynesianPowerhouse's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 camaro
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Tofiga Island
Posts: 1,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
That said, I currently have 1 brand new LGX intake manifold I'd let go of if anyone is interested and would like to try their hand on a spare intake manifold... But I have a feeling the only way anyone is going to want it is if I port it...
lemme know a price, will see what I can do this week.
__________________
Don't sit around and watch everyone else live YOUR dreams...DO SUMPT'N

When I see posts asking "whats the best intake, exhaust, etc" .... the answer to that is like a grandfather telling his grandkids "if you put salt on a birds tail, it'll let you catch it" #ThinkAboutIt

"Winning Tip: Don't take my (or anyone else's) word for it. GO TEST IT!" - Dennis Grant
PolynesianPowerhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 03:37 PM   #63
12blkgrayRS
 
12blkgrayRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro RS 2LT 6spd man
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Dickinson, Texas
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
I removed the silencers or whatever they are from the intake manifold.

Easiest way I could think of was to melt them off since I didn't have any snips small and strong enough to clip them.

Driving around I can't really say there has been any change in performance or sound. I need to find a nice non-traffic-y time on a 60mph road (there are some nearby) to go 0-60 and compare to my current record of 5.4 seconds. Honestly I can't judge any sound effects removing them may have had because my mrt v1 exhaust completely drowns out any kind of intake whistling that may be occurring.

I did notice that the K&N dropin that has about 5k miles on them now was decently dirty and so i swappped in my other K&N dropin. I'd recommend replacing (cleaning) cotton gauze filters twice as often as your paper ones as the benefits of the flow-rate diminish exponentially as the filter becomes dirty vs the linear flow rate effect of paper filters.

I have not yet tried filling in the intake manifold.
Uh you do know that they are cleanable and reusable right? That's an expensive replacement on a consistent basis...just sayin....
Unless you just have 2, clean one and keep until the next replacement??
12blkgrayRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2016, 05:11 PM   #64
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12blkgrayRS View Post
Uh you do know that they are cleanable and reusable right? That's an expensive replacement on a consistent basis...just sayin....
Unless you just have 2, clean one and keep until the next replacement??
I have two so I dont have to rush the cleaning and drying process to avoid downtime driving.

Helps that I got one free.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:43 AM   #65
132SSLE
 
Drives: 2016 1LT Hyper Blue RS
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Papillion NE
Posts: 25
Jason, would you be willing to port that last one?
132SSLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2017, 10:29 AM   #66
viewska
 
Drives: Red Hot Vert
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 134
This sounds like a fun project, has anybody else worked on this? Does anybody have the part# ??
viewska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 09:23 AM   #67
viewska
 
Drives: Red Hot Vert
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 134
if anybody is interested:

ACDELCO 12674143 {#12645755} GM Original Equipment
viewska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 01:40 AM   #68
AlphaCamaro7

 
AlphaCamaro7's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, NPP, A8, FBO, E85
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Springfield,VA
Posts: 884
So does anyone know where we can purchase a ported manifold?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Well............ At least you tried. lol
AlphaCamaro7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 09:15 AM   #69
viewska
 
Drives: Red Hot Vert
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 134
jacofab is the guy that did them on the gen5 v6, so i dunno if there is that much of a demand. I really want one, and I've got some experience with aluminum manifolds so I ordered a stock one yesterday.

We'll see how much room for improvement there is and worth doing for the community or possibly post a DIY for a mild port job
viewska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 10:01 AM   #70
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
apparently the trick is filling the thing, not really porting it (for the most part) ...to remove the cavities that cause turbulence and slow air flow down.

Not a simple feet.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.