[split_bumper]

Originally Posted by BatMobileLT1

Very cool spreadsheets - Found my 2023 Black LT1 very easily, thanks!
And just to check that I did this right - seems to be only ~16% manuals in 2023 and ~19% in 2024 (so far)?
I was thinking manuals were in the 30-40% range for Camaro's but looks like they are less common than that.

That is the same % rate I got as well.



81% automatics in 2024 - 19% manuals
84% automatics in 2023 - 16% manuals

[BatMobileLT1]

Originally Posted by split_bumper

That is the same % rate I got as well.

81% automatics in 2024 - 19% manuals
84% automatics in 2023 - 16% manuals

Good, thanks for confirming.
That means I was even luckier than I realized to find my preferred build w/color and options that I wanted at a local dealer last year!

[raidator]

Originally Posted by JPF27

I've ordered a 1SS and am wondering how common this combination is:
Black, 2F5, 3F9, A1Y, MN6, JF5

I also ordered the red knee pads and the tower motor strut--but those are dealer installed options.

I couldn't crack the spreadsheet--if it is a PIA to let me know, no hard feelings!

Would love to know how common this build is...

I found 1 so far like that... it went to Ohio vin # ends in 0104595


464 1SS, of those:
126 Black, of those:

47 Manual, of those:

6 with 2F5, of those:
6 with 3F9, of those:
2 with A1Y, of those 1 went to Iowa w/out JF5 and the other with it went to Ohio like I mentioned.


did you get a vin issued yet?

[raidator]

Updates as of 7P ET

21 still work in progress (~90-95% I'm guessing based on other post listing #s by year)
24 updated, few more non-ZL1 CE's added and a few ZL1 LEs coming out, but no more Garage 56's yet

[Adios]

Originally Posted by raidator

Updates as of 7P ET

21 still work in progress (~90-95% I'm guessing based on other post listing #s by year) 24 updated, few more non-ZL1 CE's added and a few ZL1 LEs coming out, but no more Garage 56's yet

Thank you! I love the data!!!

[arpad_m]

If the developers of this VIN-based window sticker API paid any attention to their metrics, they would've shut down this "clandestine operation" long ago, but in this case GM being GM is actually helpful to customers

Wish this service was available for earlier model years, too, but then again, this is GM

[RapidBlueZLE]

this is really cool.

The main question I have now is who ordered my car's identical twin?

[raidator]

Originally Posted by arpad_m

If the developers of this VIN-based window sticker API paid any attention to their metrics, they would've shut down this "clandestine operation" long ago, but in this case GM being GM is actually helpful to customers

Wish this service was available for earlier model years, too, but then again, this is GM

they actually do black-list you if you get greedy and pull down too many in too short a time frame, lol guess they're more worried about DoS attacks than us trying to get some info...

[raidator]

Originally Posted by RapidBlueZLE

this is really cool.

The main question I have now is who ordered my car's identical twin?

Someone in Monterey Park, CA, actually the one in Cali has a different radio (IOT vs your IOS) so you can say its a 1 of too, lol

[RapidBlueZLE]

Originally Posted by raidator

Someone in Monterey Park, CA, actually the one in Cali has a different radio (IOT vs your IOS) so you can say its a 1 of too, lol

Finally being cheap and not getting the Nav paid off. Im sure if that owner sees this they would thank me for my frugality since we can now claim to have a 1 of 1.

[Bumbleboy92]

Originally Posted by raidator

they actually do black-list you if you get greedy and pull down too many in too short a time frame, lol guess they're more worried about DoS attacks than us trying to get some info...

I experienced that a few times but imo with how little real data we’re taking from each request it’s practically meaningless to them. A real DoS maybe would entail all the requests in total at the exact same time but even then I doubt it would affect them

[arpad_m]

Originally Posted by raidator

they actually do black-list you if you get greedy and pull down too many in too short a time frame, lol guess they're more worried about DoS attacks than us trying to get some info...

Originally Posted by Bumbleboy92

I experienced that a few times but imo with how little real data we’re taking from each request it’s practically meaningless to them. A real DoS maybe would entail all the requests in total at the exact same time but even then I doubt it would affect them

Heh, it's not the DDoS aspect that I thought they were concerned about (as you guys said, this traffic is a drop in the bucket) but their preciousssss build/RPO statistics they protect so fiercely when requested via "normal" channels

[Bumbleboy92]

Originally Posted by arpad_m

Heh, it's not the DDoS aspect that I thought they were concerned about (as you guys said, this traffic is a drop in the bucket) but their preciousssss build/RPO statistics they protect so fiercely when requested via "normal" channels

That's true, if they kept with that model of charging for a build sheet through the email like they did for a while then I'd imagine this probably wouldn't be possible. On another note, I did the build sheet request back in 2019 for my 2016 and now again for 2022. They changed from giving the actual PDF file of the RPOs to giving a screenshot through their portal

[SwL_Wildcat]

Originally Posted by Linker239

Just for what it’s worth, my dealer told me GM finally removed my order from the system. They left it out there incase some weird dumb luck happened. So I’m not sure if that means GM corporate has started clearing out the unaccepted orders. I’m still on the hunt, it’s difficult finding something in the ballpark of options without a sunroof in it. The search continues.

I had 2 more additional orders for ZL1 cars in that never got allocated. As of right now they are still in the GM system awaiting allocation (which will never happen).