Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Technical Camaro Topics > Dragstrip and Launching Discussion


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-23-2016, 09:53 AM   #85
GirlyNFG
 
GirlyNFG's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS M6 w/ NPP
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 253
Theres a shop in AZ that is building an upgraded drop in pump for the tank.
But, the cam fuel lobe should help with the upper side
__________________
Whipple 2.9, Custom New Era Performance cam,
E85, LT4 fuel system, Motec powered port injection, teeny tiny Nitrous Outlet system,
Stainless Works LTs, Centerforce Triad, GForce 9" with strange pro case 3.50 gears. Carlyle 15" conversion
28"x10.5" MT ET Drag 28"x4.5" M&H fronts
PB: 9.569 @ 151.05
GirlyNFG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2016, 05:47 AM   #86
wnta1ss

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by HyperblueSS View Post
Yeah I was just doing some wishful thinking lol...I'll probably end up doing a cam with the +30% lobe to drive the mechanical pump more. Hopefully that'll give me enough headroom for a 50-100 shot while still running E85.
I don't think the high pressure fuel pump will need any attention if the motor itself is not further modified from where you are now. The wet kit taking fuel from the low-pressure rail, in my opinion, means that the low pressure pump in the tank is the one that will need upgrading. The direct injectors won't be adding any fuel for the nitrous sytem, so the demand on the HPFP should not go up because of the nitrous system.
wnta1ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:33 PM   #87
HyperblueSS
 
HyperblueSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS M6
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florida..its hot
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlyNFG View Post
Theres a shop in AZ that is building an upgraded drop in pump for the tank.
But, the cam fuel lobe should help with the upper side
Yeah I think I might just go with a cam and ported heads and call it a day...id be happy with a low 11 second NA daily driver, plus I love the way a cammed car sounds.
__________________
2016 Hyperblue 1SS M6

"If you're not first you're last!"
HyperblueSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 05:35 PM   #88
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
I will be starting a head porting program for these heads very soon.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 06:05 PM   #89
BowtieRocket

 
BowtieRocket's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS- M6
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAY View Post
I will be starting a head porting program for these heads very soon.
Awww snap!
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS M6- Garage
BowtieRocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 06:55 PM   #90
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
I have a feeling the exhaust port is why we aren't seeing good gains from headers and cams right now. If an actual port is that bad it doesn't matter what is put in front of it or behind it. It is still the limit. You can even hang it open for a while and it won't help much. I have a feeling there are going to be some good gains out of porting. I will be shooting for sub 10.40's with a light port job and baby cam on the stock converter. We will see what the car does with the headers in a week or so.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2017, 09:44 PM   #91
Fonz518
 
Drives: 16' Camaro SS 1ss M6
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Austin, tx
Posts: 27
Can u send me a link for the flex fuel sensor?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HyperblueSS View Post
I went ahead and installed the flex fuel sensor ive been sitting on for the last few weeks. I had Tim with EFI Tuning do the tuning for me. I could definitely feel the difference in response once i filled up on E85, and the car seems to idle alot smoother. Went to the track today and got in a few runs, because thats personally how I like to gauge the effectiveness of a mod VS the dyno. Only did three runs but every one was a consistent 12.1xxx. My previous best was a 12.35 on a drag radial only, so just E85 picked me up an extra 2 tenths as well as 3MPH in the quarter. Definitely one of the most cost effective mods ive done! If I can get the launch down with this 6 speed I think ill easily see an 11.9. My 60ft was a pretty mediocre 1.98 and it still ran pretty good. Special thanks to Tim who is very responsive in answering any of my questions, and tweaking the tune until it was perfect for my car. Will definitely do business with EFI Tuning in the Future.
. Is the sensor all I need besides the tune?
Fonz518 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2017, 11:04 PM   #92
EFI Tuning
 
EFI Tuning's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fonz518 View Post
. Is the sensor all I need besides the tune?
Flex Fuel kit and tune are all that is needed.

Tim
EFI Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.