Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2015, 02:21 PM   #15
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Thanks for the upload!!!!!!

spoilers below










GT350R 1:57.87
Z/28 1:59.03
GT350 TP 2:00.82

So jsut as many speculated. 350R is faster, Z/28 just a bit behind. What shocked me was the the 350TP was only 1 second behind the Z

While the mullet head for the camaro was funny, I thought MT might have kept it a little more classy lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:27 PM   #16
DevonK
 
DevonK's Avatar
 
Drives: TBD
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 179
Worth the time, although a little less Cammista and a little more Randy would have been better. Randy should have driven both cars solo in the track-talk segment, pushed Cammista out the door....

Hardly a surprise that the Camaro was beaten, but it still acquitted itself pretty well. Biggest problem: no-feel steering. Hopefully that is fixed in the Gen 6.

That FPC engine sounds incredible but I wonder if it would be a bit much to live with.
DevonK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:27 PM   #17
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
So much for the gt350 "killing" the z/28 that the Ford group predicted. That gap is about what one should expect from a newer model vs older model comparison. Now price point wise Ford did kill chevy.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:31 PM   #18
EE7
 
Drives: New
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 188
Great win Ford. Now let's see what the 6th gen Z can do. I'm expecting a blood bath. I am amazed that the new ss has similar 0 to 60 and 1/4 times as the Z.
EE7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:35 PM   #19
khell86
 
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by NASTY99Z28 View Post
So much for the gt350 "killing" the z/28 that the Ford group predicted. That gap is about what one should expect from a newer model vs older model comparison. Now price point wise Ford did kill chevy.
The Z/28 performs, but cmon man its rocking a race derived suspension, street legal race slicks, and CC brakes. All of that equipment is still better than the GT350Rs, which explains the price difference most likely.

Plus this was a GT350R with electronics package.
khell86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:35 PM   #20
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
So the "old" gen 5 Z28 is a second behind the GT350R, and almost two seconds ahead of a GT350 with the track pack. Whatever replaces the Z28 is going to walk all over these cars...I mean, even if GM left the Z28 specs alone, and just did the exact same things on a gen 6, the weight loss alone would put the car ahead of the GT350R with ease...
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:37 PM   #21
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
The Z/28 performs, but cmon man its rocking a race derived suspension, street legal race slicks, and CC brakes. All of that equipment is still better than the GT350Rs, which explains the price difference most likely.

Plus this was a GT350R with electronics package.
Yep Ford hit a homerun with this. It's faster than its primary rival. It costs less, while having more features. Where Ford was really smart though, was the packaging of the 350.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:39 PM   #22
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUMMIT WHITE SS View Post
So the "old" gen 5 Z28 is a second behind the GT350R, and almost two seconds ahead of a GT350 with the track pack. Whatever replaces the Z28 is going to walk all over these cars...I mean, even if GM left the Z28 specs alone, and just did the exact same things on a gen 6, the weight loss alone would put the car ahead of the GT350R with ease...
It very well might. Going to be exciting to see what happens!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:40 PM   #23
SS 1LE
マスタング = 遅い
 
SS 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
It costs less (GT350's)
Not really, considering a '15 Z28 is around $50K now. GM is marking them down about 20-25 grand. My dealer has a '15 Z28, sticker is $77K, I could get it for a tad over $50K...same price as a BASE GT350...
SS 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:42 PM   #24
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by khell86 View Post
The Z/28 performs, but cmon man its rocking a race derived suspension, street legal race slicks, and CC brakes. All of that equipment is still better than the GT350Rs, which explains the price difference most likely.

Plus this was a GT350R with electronics package.
Really? You're still going to run with those excuses? The GT350R runs similar tires, bigger than the Z/28, on carbon fiber wheels. The brakes on the GT350 are supposed to be as good as carbon ceramics.

The GT350R is cheaper because it's not a stand alone model. It's basically a package on the GT350. If the Z/28 had a discount model, it probably would have been cheaper too.


The GT350R is an excellent car. No need to make excuses for it. Everyone knew it would be faster than the Z/28 because it had to be.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:43 PM   #25
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUMMIT WHITE SS View Post
Not really, considering a '15 Z28 is around $50K now. GM is marking them down about 20-25 grand. My dealer has a '15 Z28, sticker is $77K, I could get it for a tad over $50K...same price as a BASE GT350...
yeah now, it costs less bc they can't give them away.

However the MSRP of a Camaro is still over 70K and the 350R with electronics package is 65K
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:44 PM   #26
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
Really? You're still going to run with those excuses? The GT350R runs similar tires, bigger than the Z/28, on carbon fiber wheels. The brakes on the GT350 are supposed to be as good as carbon ceramics.

The GT350R is cheaper because it's not a stand alone model. It's basically a package on the GT350. If the Z/28 had a discount model, it probably would have been cheaper too.
Which is where IMO Ford learned from GM's mistake. Had they offered the Z/28 in say two variants I think it would have sold a lot better. I know it wasn't meant to sell in huge numbers, but IMO a 70K camaro with no creature comforts may have turned off some buyers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:47 PM   #27
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
Which is where IMO Ford learned from GM's mistake. Had they offered the Z/28 in say two variants I think it would have sold a lot better. I know it wasn't meant to sell in huge numbers, but IMO a 70K camaro with no creature comforts may have turned off some buyers.
I don't think the Z/28 situation had any impact. Ford offered two different BOSS models before the Z/28 even came out.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2015, 02:48 PM   #28
khell86
 
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
Really? You're still going to run with those excuses? The GT350R runs similar tires, bigger than the Z/28, on carbon fiber wheels. The brakes on the GT350 are supposed to be as good as carbon ceramics.

The GT350R is cheaper because it's not a stand alone model. It's basically a package on the GT350. If the Z/28 had a discount model, it probably would have been cheaper too.


The GT350R is an excellent car. No need to make excuses for it. Everyone knew it would be faster than the Z/28 because it had to be.
They're not excuses. It is what it is. I'm not downplaying the Z/28's performance at all, simply offering my opinion for those who simply state oh well its only a second faster than the outgoing model.

So let me ask you this. Who did the better job then? The company who made a package that is cheaper and performs better than the stand alone car or no? Dont forget that the GT350 has been under development for many years. Well before we knew about the Z/28.
khell86 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.