11-25-2015, 02:21 PM | #15 |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Thanks for the upload!!!!!!
spoilers below GT350R 1:57.87 Z/28 1:59.03 GT350 TP 2:00.82 So jsut as many speculated. 350R is faster, Z/28 just a bit behind. What shocked me was the the 350TP was only 1 second behind the Z While the mullet head for the camaro was funny, I thought MT might have kept it a little more classy lol |
11-25-2015, 02:27 PM | #16 |
Drives: TBD Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 179
|
Worth the time, although a little less Cammista and a little more Randy would have been better. Randy should have driven both cars solo in the track-talk segment, pushed Cammista out the door....
Hardly a surprise that the Camaro was beaten, but it still acquitted itself pretty well. Biggest problem: no-feel steering. Hopefully that is fixed in the Gen 6. That FPC engine sounds incredible but I wonder if it would be a bit much to live with. |
11-25-2015, 02:27 PM | #17 |
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
So much for the gt350 "killing" the z/28 that the Ford group predicted. That gap is about what one should expect from a newer model vs older model comparison. Now price point wise Ford did kill chevy.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
11-25-2015, 02:31 PM | #18 |
Drives: New Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 188
|
Great win Ford. Now let's see what the 6th gen Z can do. I'm expecting a blood bath. I am amazed that the new ss has similar 0 to 60 and 1/4 times as the Z.
|
11-25-2015, 02:35 PM | #19 | |
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
Plus this was a GT350R with electronics package. |
|
11-25-2015, 02:35 PM | #20 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
So the "old" gen 5 Z28 is a second behind the GT350R, and almost two seconds ahead of a GT350 with the track pack. Whatever replaces the Z28 is going to walk all over these cars...I mean, even if GM left the Z28 specs alone, and just did the exact same things on a gen 6, the weight loss alone would put the car ahead of the GT350R with ease...
|
11-25-2015, 02:37 PM | #21 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
|
|
11-25-2015, 02:39 PM | #22 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
|
|
11-25-2015, 02:40 PM | #23 |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
|
11-25-2015, 02:42 PM | #24 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
The GT350R is cheaper because it's not a stand alone model. It's basically a package on the GT350. If the Z/28 had a discount model, it probably would have been cheaper too. The GT350R is an excellent car. No need to make excuses for it. Everyone knew it would be faster than the Z/28 because it had to be.
__________________
|
|
11-25-2015, 02:43 PM | #25 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
However the MSRP of a Camaro is still over 70K and the 350R with electronics package is 65K |
|
11-25-2015, 02:44 PM | #26 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
|
|
11-25-2015, 02:47 PM | #27 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
11-25-2015, 02:48 PM | #28 | |
Drives: 2012 Ford Focus Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
So let me ask you this. Who did the better job then? The company who made a package that is cheaper and performs better than the stand alone car or no? Dont forget that the GT350 has been under development for many years. Well before we knew about the Z/28. |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|