Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-23-2023, 09:53 AM   #15
VASTREETRACER
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro SS 1LE on order
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bowling green Va
Posts: 293
Thanks. I have had this as a screen name since probably my early 20's and it just stuck for the last 20 years.

At what point will I need to upgrade to forged internals? Ive read 8-9 lbs is fine, much more then that and I should be doing pistons and rods, but then I have also read of guys with 20lbs of boost on a stock bottom end. The car is daily driven now but hopefully my VA stuff will work out in the near future and I can pay it off, buy a truck and start working on this through the winter. Has Whipple worked out the issues they were having or is it an ongoing issue?

Thank you
Mark

Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
OP's username is a brave, if not brazen move I even take down my radar detector whenever I drive through VA...

On topic, I have something similar to the super street brawler package from Ted Jannetty's shop that he described above, except I also have forged internals (the engine had to be torn down no thanks to GM, and Ted suggested that we might as well), with the old Magnuson 2300. It's a fantastic blower with a ton of headroom, and its successor, the 2650 is even better, you can't go wrong with these.
__________________
2017 Camaro SS 50th anniversary, I sold it but 2010 Camaro SS, whipple, cam, full bolt ons and full exhaust made 739/656 RWHP/TQ on 93 pump gas
VASTREETRACER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 10:19 AM   #16
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by VASTREETRACER View Post
Thanks. I have had this as a screen name since probably my early 20's and it just stuck for the last 20 years.

At what point will I need to upgrade to forged internals? Ive read 8-9 lbs is fine, much more then that and I should be doing pistons and rods, but then I have also read of guys with 20lbs of boost on a stock bottom end. The car is daily driven now but hopefully my VA stuff will work out in the near future and I can pay it off, buy a truck and start working on this through the winter. Has Whipple worked out the issues they were having or is it an ongoing issue?

Thank you
Mark
No worries, I was just messing with ya about the username

Joshinator99 or KingLT1 will be your expert on the Whipple, I never had one.

My car runs 10 psi of boost, and strictly speaking it would be okay on the stock bottom end, especially since it's a flex fuel car now so I can run ethanol, but it would be close to the edge; when a manufacturing defect in one of my factory GM heads reared its ugly... head (har-har), I decided to go for forged internals for extra safety and in case I want more power later.

I find it hard to believe that the stock LT1 bottom end would have any longevity at 20 psi of boost.

Ted discussed my car in detail on the dyno video, see here for more information on this package: https://www.facebook.com/jannettyrac...5032877481682/
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 12:27 PM   #17
94guy

 
Drives: 99 Camaro; 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
I'm pleased with mine too. If I could race at sea level, I believe I could coax this thing into 8.9x with just a few minor changes. The primary problem is, the NHRA requires a cage at 151 mph, so I might be limited to one night's racing.
I may get my eddie ported and get E in it not sure yet.
__________________
2018 Camaro SS A8 Edelbrock 2650 FBO 93 octane 9.54@144 Pump E 9.59@152

2010 Camaro
Stock bottom end with 46,000+miles JRE remote tuning Whipple A6 and Drive it to and from the track 9.46@146
94guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 01:36 PM   #18
VASTREETRACER
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro SS 1LE on order
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bowling green Va
Posts: 293
Thanks. Are you running the stock injectors? I see both the- Whipple and Maggie reuse the LT1 injectors. I am getting a flex fuel tune this Friday. Which ever route I go I will eventually want more power just like every man and will need to upgrade my entire fuel system. Im currently building a wishlist/spreadsheet so I can get this project going sooner then later.

Side note. Where in East Tennessee are you? I grew up in the Church Hill, Kings Port and Orbank (all my dads side is still in Orbank/ SW Virginia and my sister is in Rogersville) and my Wife is from Nashville. We are currently Just North of Richmond.


Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
No worries, I was just messing with ya about the username

Joshinator99 or KingLT1 will be your expert on the Whipple, I never had one.

My car runs 10 psi of boost, and strictly speaking it would be okay on the stock bottom end, especially since it's a flex fuel car now so I can run ethanol, but it would be close to the edge; when a manufacturing defect in one of my factory GM heads reared its ugly... head (har-har), I decided to go for forged internals for extra safety and in case I want more power later.

I find it hard to believe that the stock LT1 bottom end would have any longevity at 20 psi of boost.

Ted discussed my car in detail on the dyno video, see here for more information on this package: https://www.facebook.com/jannettyrac...5032877481682/
__________________
2017 Camaro SS 50th anniversary, I sold it but 2010 Camaro SS, whipple, cam, full bolt ons and full exhaust made 739/656 RWHP/TQ on 93 pump gas
VASTREETRACER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 01:59 PM   #19
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by VASTREETRACER View Post
Thanks. Are you running the stock injectors? I see both the- Whipple and Maggie reuse the LT1 injectors. I am getting a flex fuel tune this Friday. Which ever route I go I will eventually want more power just like every man and will need to upgrade my entire fuel system. Im currently building a wishlist/spreadsheet so I can get this project going sooner then later.

Side note. Where in East Tennessee are you? I grew up in the Church Hill, Kings Port and Orbank (all my dads side is still in Orbank/ SW Virginia and my sister is in Rogersville) and my Wife is from Nashville. We are currently Just North of Richmond.
No, I have LT4 injectors that flow 16% more than their LT1 counterparts. From my limited understanding the fuel system is the weakest link in the stock setup, so I wouldn't keep running the LT1 injectors---unless installing a port injection setup with its own auxiliary ECM is an option for you, in which case you shouldn't need to mess with the DI fuel system much (laynlo15 has recently done this, I believe, on his new car).

You can see the most relevant mods in my signature and a more complete list at https://www.camaro6.com/forums/camar...=view&id=22819. Of course there are other small supporting mods such as LS3 front and rear main seal, new pushrods etc., but I'll tell you the truth, I'm "just an egg" and will only do simple stuff on my car, critical powertrain work is best done by professionals, of whom I'm definitely not one
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 02:30 PM   #20
adamjwilson
 
Drives: 2022 Camaro 2SS A10
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: FL
Posts: 524
Flex Fuel kit will require a tune if you want to use it. Armpad's right, the fuel system is the weak link in the LT1 setups. LT4 stuff has gotten expensive lately, so you may want to look at port injection..... running 8-10 PSI on stock bottom on E85 no issues, but anything more, suggest you look at building the bottom end for longevity.
__________________
2022 Camaro 2SS/ Whipple 3.0 / 2"Headers/ PRC LTX Heads/ Forged Internals/LT4 fueling/ DSX Aux/
DSX Flex Fuel/ Meth Injection/ Katech 112 TB/ RotoFab Big Gulp/ Corsa NPP/ Various exterior mods
adamjwilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 02:53 PM   #21
ZLRob
 
ZLRob's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Concordia
Posts: 437
The LT4 is definitely a stronger/ better built engine over the LT1. Your average build on the LT4 usually just involves the very basic stuff if you want to get more power out of it but the LT1 on the other hand when planned for higher than normal boost will usually require the internals within block to be built.

Blame the higher factory compression and weaker internals.
__________________
2017 Red Hot ZL1 A10 - Apex ARC-8's, 305/ 325 PS4's, DSX 9.06 12% Pulley, NGK HR7 Ruthenium spark plugs, Katech Oil Pump, LME tensioner, DOD delete, Cam, MPI lid, Soler ported 87mm (91mm effective) TB, Granatelli SS plug wires, Cordes LTR reservoir, DMS T-stat housing, Borla X pipe, AFe NPP exhaust, Black Widow Angry Housewife/ Venom 250 mufflers, BMR engine mounts, Banks iDash, Lithium Battery, Course Motorsports phone mount, AEM X- Series, HP Tuners, JMS, E85, 13.6 psi
737 HP/ 779 TQ

ZLRob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2023, 03:10 PM   #22
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94guy View Post
I may get my eddie ported and get E in it not sure yet.
I'm really not sure if mine would make more power on Eth, but yours definitely will. Is your longblock stock?
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2023, 04:06 AM   #23
94guy

 
Drives: 99 Camaro; 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
I'm really not sure if mine would make more power on Eth, but yours definitely will. Is your longblock stock?
built bottomend with a cam. i have made about 8 hits with it going from 9.80 to 9.54.
__________________
2018 Camaro SS A8 Edelbrock 2650 FBO 93 octane 9.54@144 Pump E 9.59@152

2010 Camaro
Stock bottom end with 46,000+miles JRE remote tuning Whipple A6 and Drive it to and from the track 9.46@146
94guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2023, 08:24 AM   #24
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94guy View Post
built bottomend with a cam. i have made about 8 hits with it going from 9.80 to 9.54.
No Problem Raceway is one of those sea level tracks I referred to above. I raced there in 2010 with the DA at -1000 ft.!!
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2023, 12:54 PM   #25
94guy

 
Drives: 99 Camaro; 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
No Problem Raceway is one of those sea level tracks I referred to above. I raced there in 2010 with the DA at -1000 ft.!!
WOW you were way down here few times a year we can get great weather but the track has to be open.
__________________
2018 Camaro SS A8 Edelbrock 2650 FBO 93 octane 9.54@144 Pump E 9.59@152

2010 Camaro
Stock bottom end with 46,000+miles JRE remote tuning Whipple A6 and Drive it to and from the track 9.46@146
94guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 02:58 AM   #26
VASTREETRACER
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro SS 1LE on order
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bowling green Va
Posts: 293
On a side note. Took the car to the tuner tonight. Car made 438hp 414tq first pull, final numbers were 440hp/448tq on 93 and 460hp/469tq on E60. Considering the car only has a LT2 intake (200.00), CAI cold air which was on the car, speed engineering long tubes with a catted x pipe (600.00) and a Flex fuel kit (200.00). So I'm a grand in parts in and feel like it put down pretty good numbers especially in upper 90* temps. Not sure what it would have made right off the showroom floor but from what I've read 390s-410 seems to be the average on a manual car. This was on a dynojet dyno.
__________________
2017 Camaro SS 50th anniversary, I sold it but 2010 Camaro SS, whipple, cam, full bolt ons and full exhaust made 739/656 RWHP/TQ on 93 pump gas
VASTREETRACER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 08:52 AM   #27
Ericdared
 
Drives: 2022 Camaro zl1
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Tx
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZLRob View Post
The LT4 is definitely a stronger/ better built engine over the LT1. Your average build on the LT4 usually just involves the very basic stuff if you want to get more power out of it but the LT1 on the other hand when planned for higher than normal boost will usually require the internals within block to be built.

Blame the higher factory compression and weaker internals.
I thought the bottom end was the same on the lt1 and lt4, just the heads,supercharger, and fueling are different?
Ericdared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2023, 09:04 AM   #28
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ericdared View Post
I thought the bottom end was the same on the lt1 and lt4, just the heads,supercharger, and fueling are different?
Compression ratio, and forged internals are also on that list of differences.

My Engine machinist for over 43 years who builds Nascar and Busch motors commented on how impressive the LT4 engine design is.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.