10-24-2019, 12:46 AM | #43 | |
Drives: SS 1LE, 89 TTA, 91 GTA, 91 Formula Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: NW IN
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Dodge sells them because they are a car that appeals to the masses. Relatively fast, functional as an actual car, you can see of it and the back seat and trunks are usable. The Camaro is superior to enthusiasts, but unfortunately we do not buy enough cars in volume compared to the general populace. |
|
10-24-2019, 05:28 AM | #44 | |
Drives: 2018 ZL1 , 2020 GMC AT4 Carbon Pro Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
Of course the LT5 would raise some eyebrows, but it would likely add significantly to the cost. My comment was more in reference to putting the LT2 into the SS. I think if the LT5 were to find its way into the ZL1, prices would be on par with the GT 500. IMHO, even with HP rivaling that of Dodge, you still have the disadvantage of selling an essentially 2 seater sports car with poor visibility. That's kind of why I implied that more HP won't make much of a difference. The sales volume of the ZL1 is so small, and the end is so near that I just can't see GM doing much to try and compete with Dodge or Ford with the Camaro. I really hope I'm wrong about all of this, but I think at this point knowing what Ford and Dodge are producing, if GM had any plans to do a significant engine upgrade, they would likely release that to the public to try and make a lot of people hold off on buying a GT500 or Redeye. |
|
10-24-2019, 07:22 AM | #45 |
Drives: Black Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nj
Posts: 440
|
I wonder if gm just got caught cheating. Maybe they dyno’d a souped up press car
|
10-24-2019, 08:05 AM | #46 | ||
Drives: E92 BMW M3 Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,496
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
SOLD - 2013 1LE - Pat G Spec'd Cam, NPP with 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers with High Flow Cats, Intake w/scoop, Ported Throttle Body, and Apex 1.25" Lowering Springs.
J-Rod Built and Matt@FSP Tuned |
||
10-24-2019, 08:08 AM | #47 |
Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,047
|
IF they tried to time some 0-60 times or something similar, the results should have confirmed or dispelled the reported dyno figures easily.
Or did they ?? |
10-24-2019, 06:21 PM | #48 |
Drives: 1998 Trans Am / 2018 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Chester PA
Posts: 102
|
The numbers were run on a Mustang Dyno. Mustang Dynos can be manipulated to show higher numbers. Spend a little time on YouTube looking at Dynojet vs Mustang. Now I’m not saying it was done intentionally. But it’s possible somebody went into the settings and changed something inadvertently during a previous run with another car causing false readings for the next car That was run.
|
10-24-2019, 07:36 PM | #49 |
Drives: 2023 2SS, 2018 1SS 1LE, 1993 Z/28 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Midwest
Posts: 819
|
In the sales race, you guys need to give credit to Dodge for the amount of advertising it does - plus the fact that it comes up with a new model or two that’s of interest to a new segment of the marketplace every year. Even the incentives are inventive - rebates of a dollar per horsepower were noticed by the buying public, while Chevy and Ford did nothing that was very visible. How else can Dodge be No. 1 in sales with Hemi cars that feel and drive like they’re encased in concrete?
|
10-24-2019, 07:46 PM | #50 | |
Drives: A few Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 854
|
Quote:
MT should be better than this. I don't know why they even published that rubbish.
__________________
-Dave
HPDE/DD: 2018 Camaro ZL1 1LE || HPDE/DD: 2015 Subaru BRZ ||Tow Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 8.1L || Weekend toy: 1994 MR2 Turbo || The other weekend toy: 1993 MR2 Turbo || Track car: 1998 Integra Type-R || Race car: 1996 Integra GS-R || New race car build: 1992 Honda Civic Hatchback Too many cars.. never. |
|
10-24-2019, 07:54 PM | #51 | |
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,169
|
Quote:
Dodge has nothing to advertise BUT Charger and Challenger. Both Chevy and Ford know that for what is now a tiny fraction of the 17,000,000 unit market advertising is not money well spent. But Dodge with a lookalike mini van and a 10 year old SUV you would all think it’s advertising. It isn’t.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
10-24-2019, 08:31 PM | #52 |
Drives: 2018 NGM ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 145
|
Pretty sure I mentioned this before, but motor trend keeps putting out these high numbers. I don't know if there are any real world independent tests yet but they got the same ~30% increase over rated horsepower on the latest Supra. https://www.motortrend.com/news/2020...pra-dyno-test/
|
10-24-2019, 08:36 PM | #53 | |
Drives: 1998 Trans Am / 2018 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Chester PA
Posts: 102
|
How motor trends numbers are wrong.
Check out this vid Last edited by Steve83ta; 10-24-2019 at 08:46 PM. |
|
10-24-2019, 11:14 PM | #54 |
Drives: 2016 SS Convertible Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: California
Posts: 1,108
|
Ya. But did Chevrolet ever test with magic fairy dust ?
I think not. |
10-25-2019, 08:00 AM | #55 |
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
|
The track is the only way we'll see if those numbers work. My Camaro on the same rwhp back in 2017 ran 10.80s@129 but not on street tires. The C8 may not need a drag pack since its a mid engine and traction shouldn't be an issue with it and GM advertises under 3 seconds to 60 so it should hook and book at the drag strip on a sticky track.
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
|
10-25-2019, 09:32 AM | #56 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 1,980
|
C8
I don't think they would do this, not everyone is going to put their car on a dyno to compare but I guarantee the car is going to get raced and tested a lot and the 2.8 0 to 60 and 11.1 quarter mile has to be repeatable. No way GM would put a ringer with performance numbers the real car will get nowhere near. Probably a mustang dyno issue since they have many inputs that can be manipulated to effect the number produced. Not shifting on mustang dynos, great tools but can be easily manipulated or miscalibrated.
__________________
2000 Miata - aventi storm wheels, roll bar.
2019 Mustang GT pp1 - svt pp2 wheels, mbrp cat back, sync 3 upgrade, p1x procharger + stg2 intercooler. 2018 Colorado zr2 - zr2 sport bar, showcase spare tire. 2018 Camaro SS 1LE - GM cai, black bowties, suede knee bolsters, 1le plate frame, black fuel door, dark tails + 3rd brake light, euro side markers + led's, GM all weather floor mats, velossatech big mouth, GM strut brace. 2017 Corvette Grandsport (sold) - untouched. 2006 GTO (sold) - iat relocation, air box mod, monero side marker lights. |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|