Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2019, 11:14 AM   #1
Bosse'sBoss

 
Bosse'sBoss's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro SS 6 spd manual transm.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: RGV Texas
Posts: 1,463
6th gen Camaros VS exotic cars from the 80's.

Hi Guys,

Have you ever competed in the track VS any prior exotics, like the Porsche 928, BMW M1 or De Tomaso Pantera from the 80's? I wonder how they would perform against our newer 6th. gen Camaros.
__________________
'16 Camaro SS
Prior cars:
'14 Corvette C7 Stingray Z51
'14 Camaro ZL1 w/. Recaro seats
'11 Mustang GT 5.0 w. track package
'02 Porsche 911 Carrera
'05 Infiniti G35 coupe sport

Last edited by Bosse'sBoss; 05-14-2019 at 07:25 AM.
Bosse'sBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2019, 01:20 PM   #2
Rayvan
Rayvan
 
Drives: 2018 1SS1LE, Silver Ice Metallic
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 275
They would all get beat bad. A 928 only had 240 HP, I think. The Pantera about the same, as it had a smogged, low perf. 351 from the seventies. As for handling, it wouldn't even be close.
Rayvan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2019, 03:00 PM   #3
DevilsReject97
Nightmare
 
DevilsReject97's Avatar
 
Drives: Your mom crazy in bed
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naptown
Posts: 2,438
Pretty much everything from the 80's and early 90's would get smoked....

Porsche 959, Lambo Diablo (1990 when they first started), Ferrari GT 40, perhaps one or two other cars...

But most of them would just get owned....at the drag or on a road course..
__________________
DevilsReject97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2019, 09:45 PM   #4
Hops
 
Hops's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 1ss 1le, blue wrap
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 633
I would think the ferrari f40 would be faster with a better power to weight ratio... but fastestlaps.com estimates a ferrari f40 with a 1:39 a Laguna Seca, and the Camaro ss 1le has a 1:37.78!
Hops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2019, 10:34 PM   #5
Bosse'sBoss

 
Bosse'sBoss's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro SS 6 spd manual transm.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: RGV Texas
Posts: 1,463
Talking

We live on great times. Great performance Camaros at a low entry ticket. That's nice. When I was young I always dreamed of owning a Porsche 944 Turbo, and now I have a Camaro SS that can beat any of those exotic cars for much less $$. That's amazing
__________________
'16 Camaro SS
Prior cars:
'14 Corvette C7 Stingray Z51
'14 Camaro ZL1 w/. Recaro seats
'11 Mustang GT 5.0 w. track package
'02 Porsche 911 Carrera
'05 Infiniti G35 coupe sport
Bosse'sBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2019, 03:55 PM   #6
Craig
 
Drives: ‘23 SS1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosse'sBoss View Post
We live on great times. Great performance Camaros at a low entry ticket. That's nice. When I was young I always dreamed of owning a Porsche 944 Turbo, and now I have a Camaro SS that can beat any of those exotic cars for much less $$. That's amazing
Sounds like you’re about my age, when we cut our teeth performance like this wasn’t available at any price. Getting ready to pull the trigger on a sixth gen after about ten years of very basic a-to-b transportation, and I still can’t believe a car I can actually afford could offer this much.
Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2019, 04:06 PM   #7
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Thing is it's not only about the speed of the vehicles, it's about the memories that they produced while I love my present car and it performs great I think back to my Pontiac 400 Formula I had in HS and the fun we had in it even though it had less hp than my Wife's minivan.. Next up my 86 Mustang GT cruising around Oahu HI in my 20s and all the ladies that enjoyed its performance taking it from a 14.5 sec car to 10.30s. I don't think my present car will ever match up to those wild and crazy nights in the cars past.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2019, 02:41 PM   #8
HighIron
 
Drives: 2024 2SS Summit White
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: US
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosse'sBoss View Post
We live on great times. Great performance Camaros at a low entry ticket. That's nice. When I was young I always dreamed of owning a Porsche 944 Turbo, and now I have a Camaro SS that can beat any of those exotic cars for much less $$. That's amazing

It's really something isn't it? I mean, the absolute cheapest, zero-option entry level Camaro you can buy today does the quarter in 14 flat and hit's 60 in the 5s.



As you say, we live in great times.
HighIron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2019, 05:31 PM   #9
redcoats1976


 
Drives: LT W/2LT,blue metallic
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: central florida
Posts: 4,914
yup,if you had told me my new 6 cylinder camaro could hang with tom sellecks(magnum PI) ferrari back in the 70s i would have laughed at you.of course back in the mid 70s most cars were kind of slow.
redcoats1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2019, 08:17 PM   #10
GuywithL86
 
Drives: Black
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nj
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosse'sBoss View Post
Hi Guys,

Have you ever competed in the track VS any prior exotics, like the Porsche 928, BMW M1 or De Tomaso Pantera from the 80's? I wonder how they would perform against our newer 6th. gen Camaros.
There is not a single street legal car produced in the 80’s that would compete with a camaro

In the 90’s the list is small and mostly ultra exotic

Eb110 SS
Xj220 maybe
Mclaren f1
Clk gtr
Porsche gt1
Ferrari f50
Tvr speed 12
Nissan r390
Dauer 962
GuywithL86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2019, 06:35 AM   #11
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Lets take a spin back to 1987 when Camaro had total sales of 137,760 and compare that to todays numbers. Seems folks liked that car a whole lot more than today's offering despite its non-supercar like performance. The Camaro at that time was a beautiful machine.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot

Last edited by newmoon; 05-20-2019 at 06:59 AM.
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2019, 08:13 AM   #12
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
Lets take a spin back to 1987 when Camaro had total sales of 137,760 and compare that to todays numbers. Seems folks liked that car a whole lot more than today's offering despite its non-supercar like performance. The Camaro at that time was a beautiful machine.
Did people like that car a whole lot more, or were there a whole lot more people that like this type of car?

1987 was the year that Ford change the GT to give it an extremely controversial (hideously ugly) front end. It still out sold today's offering from Ford ...handily.
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2019, 09:02 AM   #13
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotlap View Post
Did people like that car a whole lot more, or were there a whole lot more people that like this type of car?

1987 was the year that Ford change the GT to give it an extremely controversial (hideously ugly) front end. It still out sold today's offering from Ford ...handily.
Yeah that ugly front end for the GT still outsold the Camaro by about 30,000 vehicles. Also yes todays Mustang sales are lower that the 1987 numbers but no where near as bad as the Camaro shocking decline.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2019, 09:49 AM   #14
Baldilocks01SS
 
Baldilocks01SS's Avatar
 
Drives: SEARCHING
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
Lets take a spin back to 1987 when Camaro had total sales of 137,760 and compare that to todays numbers. Seems folks liked that car a whole lot more than today's offering despite its non-supercar like performance. The Camaro at that time was a beautiful machine.
The same demographic today, buy SUVs and crossovers....
Baldilocks01SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.