Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2012, 07:28 PM   #57
07-SRT
 
07-SRT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
wow..... "Napoleon Complex" ^^^^^
__________________

2015 Camaro 2SS

Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE
07-SRT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 08:03 AM   #58
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by K32 Camaro View Post
Uhh.. wrong. The current charger r/t is 3770 lbs. and try 35k. Do you want to a picture of the vso and maroni?
ROFL!!!!! you are nuts on both accounts, 3770? Have they removed the enitire interior, wheels, and god knows what else? Factory R/T is 4200 pounds, RWD R/T starts at 30k, AWD around 32k, please check edmunds.com, kbb.com, nadaguides.com, or even dodge.com to see how WAY off you are.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 03:51 PM   #59
samhardy2008
 
samhardy2008's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 3.6 camaro
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tyler
Posts: 197
the new challenger is by far the most retro looking out of the mustang and camaro group...its a sexy lookin car to me...i dont own a challenger but i really really wanna see chrysler throw some forced induction into the line up...FI the challenger and take some weight off of it and that would be a bad ass car....imo the camaro and the challenger both could go on a diet....i honestly wanna own the new 5.0 stang, srt8 challenger, and ss camaro...and for sure want all three of the classics...no brand loyality here just a car guy
__________________
samhardy2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 03:54 PM   #60
samhardy2008
 
samhardy2008's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 3.6 camaro
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Tyler
Posts: 197
but i will say i really do not like what they did with the charger....the challenger looks bad ass but the charger just isnt a good looking car but to each their own....590 hp is alot of power hopefully chrysler,ford and chevy keep doing this kind of stuff...love that they are really having the pony wars again...great stuff will happen with them tryin to constantly one up each other! great time to be a car addict!
__________________
samhardy2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 07:36 PM   #61
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
i wish it was a factory offering and not a crate engine.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Challenger Priced Design1stCode2nd General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 176 09-08-2008 07:33 PM
Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 AirGoya Chevy Camaro vs... 86 07-24-2008 11:20 AM
2009 Dodge Challenger Press Release (introducing model lineup) Tran General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 8 03-20-2008 12:47 AM
Challenger Pricing LSxcellent General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 31 12-03-2007 09:00 PM
Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 08-09-2007 02:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.