Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2008, 09:26 PM   #15
littlecammi
 
littlecammi's Avatar
 
Drives: '87 Pontiac Fiero GT
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur View Post
GM makes decisions based upon market trends and consumer responses to those trends.
Just as every other car manufacturer does the exact same thing.

Most four-door sedans look very similar to each other regardless of manufacturer. This is partially the result of decades of rounding edges and raising the tail ends of cars to reduce aerodynamic drag and increase fuel economy. You have to look for badging or differences in headlight and grill design just to try to differentiate between the scores of look-alikes.

Or a car manufacturer can chose to deliberately make a unique design that will stand out and can be easily recognized as a specific model or brand. But doing so guarantees a design that some people will love but others will hate. And if more people hate the design than those that love it, then sales are abysmal. The modern sharp-edged Cadillacs were a design risk that paid off. But some people still hate them, including long-time older Cadillac owners (like my Dad).

Going retro and utilizing styling from a legendary vehicle from the past (such as the '69 Camaro coupe) brings instant goodwill with people who remember it and increases the percentage of people who will love the design. The movie industry does the same thing. Sequels to successful movies, remakes of older successful movies, and movie versions of successful television shows are all less risky than making a totally new movie that has to earn its own audience.

Last edited by littlecammi; 09-03-2008 at 09:55 PM.
littlecammi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 11:25 PM   #16
MajorTom
 
MajorTom's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
Losing the Kappa cars is depressing. They were decent performers and good looking cars.

The prospect of a 3 series fighter from Cadillac has me excited though. That'd be amazing.
MajorTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 02:36 PM   #17
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,371
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAG UR IT View Post
Is there a possibility that GM can tool the Alpha line, or set it up, in such a manner to be RWD, FWD, or even AWD? Because if so, this could be a major break through for GM. I could easily see GM pouring money into an Alpha line that can accommodate more vehicle types.

Could you all see a lighter Alpha Camaro, CTS coupe, Sky, Solstice, Cobalt, Aveo, etc. being built on a speific line?
That would take a massive amount of engineering and money that GM doesn't have. Cobalt will forever be FWD, same as the Cruze. Aveo probably wouldn't even fit on the same platform. Sky and Solstice on Alpha are definite possibilities, but Camaro will remain forever on Zeta and the CTS/CTS Coupe/CTS Wagon are all rumored to switch from Sigma over to Zeta after a while or the two platforms will be combined.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 02:53 PM   #18
Angrybird 12
7 year Cancer Survivor!
 
Angrybird 12's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,547
Ok Kappa Owners think of this.. the Kappas cost 10K more then they sell for, that means a 27K Kappa is really worth 37K.. Soo if that is true then that means if and when they drop the Kappa cars, we will have instant classics that should quickly jump up in value...... no more being built (as long as they are being built you can get them cheaper) Low volume is also on our side. It's not that the car is a failure, its GM's Economics.

may be a good investment if you young guys want to get one and hold on to it for 20 or 30 years.
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word!
Angrybird 12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 03:52 PM   #19
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,104
Well it's not really instant classic. It needs to age 25+ years first.

And parts & service will be hard to find. Right now there are a LOT of NLA parts at Chevy dealer (for olders cars). Not saying it's not good. It's a good solid car. But GM needs to get back to basics and get sales going again.

There should not be a need to try to fill every single tiny sales nich.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why you like Muscle Cars? .Hack General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 20 06-12-2016 08:58 AM
What is the difference between a Sports car and a Muscle car (whats your opinion) Camaro Man 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 33 02-15-2011 11:15 PM
Camaro Drawing tribone Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 10 07-27-2008 09:57 PM
Top 10 dou*hebag cars 09'Z28 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 7 04-30-2008 10:36 AM
Top Gear - Dodge Challenger & American Muscle Cars Tran General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 8 04-24-2008 10:48 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.