Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2021, 03:11 PM   #15
serper3
 
serper3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
Here's more examples, info. from the test published today by C&D on the M3 Comp vs Alfa Giulia:

'21 M3 Comp:
60-130 mph: 9.3 sec (3% slower than ZL1)
100-130 mph: 5.2 sec (4% slower than ZL1)
130-150 mph: 5.5 sec (9% quicker than ZL1)

'21 Alfa Giulia Quadrifoglio:
60-130 mph: 10.3 sec (14.4% slower than ZL1)
100-130 mph: 5.7 sec (14% slower than ZL1)
130-150 mph: 6.5 sec (8% slower than ZL1)

The ZL1 should be getting quicker and quicker compared to these lower powered cars as speeds climb, not as in this case noticeably slower than an M3 Comp 130-150 mph. And the Giulia should not be closing the gap vs the ZL1. Obviously, with the M3 Comp running 1/4 mile in 11.6 @ 124 mph it is a lot more than 503 crank hp, but the ZL1 is quicker below 130 mph, yet slower above 130 mph.

I might chalk this up to the one test by C&D having a ZL1 that was a bit slow, but MT ran the exact same time and trap speed (11.5 @ 125 mph as C&D, however w/ 91 octane), and I noticed the same large drop off above 130 mph in the ZLE A10 test by C&D (vs. the GT500 and Redeye in 2019). Again, aero can't explain it because the GT500 CFTP has a large wing and aero bits as well, and was MUCH quicker above 130 mph than the ZLE. More so than the 110 hp Delta suggests.

Anyway, I'm still sticking to my theories #1 and #3 above. I think it's a combination of undersized HEXs that can't keep up for long WOT applications + hotter ambient air testing conditions (can't make up loss of timing with DA corrections) + subsequent timing loss = slower at the end of a long WOT pull.
I wonder how much of an improvement over stock just an e50 flex fuel sensor and tune would be.

I am in CA so have been considering this but do not want to do LTs or anything else difficult to go back to stock.
serper3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 08:24 PM   #16
Stephen12ZL1


 
Stephen12ZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: '21 ZLE A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 6,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by serper3 View Post
I wonder how much of an improvement over stock just an e50 flex fuel sensor and tune would be.

I am in CA so have been considering this but do not want to do LTs or anything else difficult to go back to stock.
it helped a bit with E50 on my '17 so I tuned my '21 immediately. I will confirm/post the performance difference after VIR in October.
__________________
'21 ZLE A10 Wild Cherry PDR 2:00.78 VIR Full 10.68@131.69 1.68 60'
'17 ZL1 A10 Mosaic Black PDR/Nav 2:03.08 VIR Full 11.003@129.2 1.75 (sold)
'15 Z/28 #325 Black a/c & stereo. 2:10.1 VIR Full (sold)
'12 ZL1 A6 Black 10.52@131 1.55 60' 2:13 VIR Full (sold)
Stephen12ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.