04-06-2021, 05:35 PM | #1 |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,556
|
HP Difference: 93 v. 104 u/l octane?
I'm going to have these two tunes prepared for my car, but I have never tested any engine and compared pump gas to race gas hp. In this case, it's 93 v. 104u/l. I wondering if anyone here has or knows a shop that has performed such tests? Do you have an opinion of what these dynos would show?
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650. 100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O. 2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel. 4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes). 2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next. |
04-06-2021, 07:49 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro SS 1LE M6 Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Northern California
Posts: 345
|
The car from the factory is tuned for 93. 100octane 200octane 500 octane won’t make any difference. Considering that your car is stock tune. But looking at your profile seems like you have tuned for your mods. Higher octane really just allows more timing. In tune means more HP.
__________________
Camaro 2SS 1LE, MBRP Catback, Mishimoto Catch Can, Rotofab dry, TSP1 7/8” headers,DSX FF, Pray ported MSD, 95mm TB
492WHP 473WTQ |
04-06-2021, 08:05 PM | #3 | ||
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,741
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
|
||
04-06-2021, 09:54 PM | #4 | |
Drives: 18 zl1 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: central alabama
Posts: 935
|
Quote:
I don't have any reason to not believe them, but it does seem to be a bit proud |
|
04-06-2021, 10:14 PM | #5 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,741
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
|
|
04-06-2021, 10:36 PM | #6 |
Dumb Ass Deluxe
Drives: A Tricked Out Mountain Bike Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,959
|
IMO, you should be running higher than 93 octane in your motor. Keep adding octane until the KS stop picking it up. 1 gal of xylene to 10 gal of pump gas will raise octane 2 points.
(91-->93. 93-->95) Or, obviously, 5:1 will raise it 4 points Keep adding a gallon to creep up on the actual amount you need to stop knocking and add 1 more point for insurance and that's what your engine should be drinking. Any higher octane than necessary is a waste of money, fuel, and lowers power.
__________________
|
04-07-2021, 12:45 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2018 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE 6M Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: California
Posts: 283
|
Add a flex fuel sensor, tune for 93 and E85, and call it a day.
__________________
Bolt-ons.
|
04-07-2021, 07:16 AM | #8 |
Drives: 2021 300 Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 968
|
Gasoline does not create Horsepower. It supports the Horsepower the engine has built into it. Thru ignition.
|
04-07-2021, 11:52 AM | #9 |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,556
|
These results are on a Gearhead Automotive Performance tuned 2016 Ford twin-turbo 3.5L V6. We'll put it on the dyno soon and find out:
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650. 100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O. 2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel. 4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes). 2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next. |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|