2015 Mustang EcoBoost Dyno - Page 3

PoorMansCamaro · 10-08-2014, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by its a syn

I think my biggest question is, what does a turbo 4 Mustang sound like? I hate to say it here, but that car does look good. Camaro's Gen 6 has it's work cut out. Ho hum refresh ain't gonna cut it.

They put a sound enhancer inside the car to make it sound beefier. There's a video somewhere.

crysalis_01 · 10-08-2014, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

They put a sound enhancer inside the car to make it sound beefier. There's a video somewhere.

Yeah, it has active noise cancelling. Which uses sound waves opposite to the frequencies that are "abrasive" leaving only frequencies that make the engine sound better inside the cabin. It's actually an older tech, but this is it's first application in Mustang.

crysalis_01 · 10-08-2014, 10:17 PM

Svtp's Facebook page just posted a vid from one of the guys at Woodbine (the guys who did the dyno test on page 1) running a 13.8@103mph.

BobDigi5060 · 10-09-2014, 10:52 AM

I saw someone post a 13.5 @ 109 mph.

KMPrenger · 10-09-2014, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crysalis_01

Svtp's Facebook page just posted a vid from one of the guys at Woodbine (the guys who did the dyno test on page 1) running a 13.8@103mph.

I can believe it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobDigi5060

I saw someone post a 13.5 @ 109 mph.

Don't believe it. Not the 109 part.

GretchenGotGrowl · 10-09-2014, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crysalis_01

Svtp's Facebook page just posted a vid from one of the guys at Woodbine (the guys who did the dyno test on page 1) running a 13.8@103mph.

That sounds about right to me.

SpeedIsLife · 10-09-2014, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger

I can believe it.

Don't believe it. Not the 109 part.

That was a 5.0 PP (M6) that had a really, really bad launch. It was one of AmericanMuscle's development fleet GT's that couldn't get traction and was wheel-hopping.

KMPrenger · 10-09-2014, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife

That was a 5.0 PP (M6) that had a really, really bad launch. It was one of AmericanMuscle's development fleet GT's that couldn't get traction and was wheel-hopping.

Gotcha. I figured it was probably something like that.

Q'smuscle · 10-09-2014, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by its a syn

I think my biggest question is, what does a turbo 4 Mustang sound like? I hate to say it here, but that car does look good. Camaro's Gen 6 has it's work cut out. Ho hum refresh ain't gonna cut it.

Unless you don't like the refresh! I hardly see the 6th Gen having any trouble in the look department because most ppl still would pick the 13-14 mustang anyways! As far as this eco boost mustang , it's Ford doing what they do best eco boosting!

I want to see a 15 mustang that looks mean !

87GNX · 10-09-2014, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Q'smuscle

Unless you don't like the refresh! I hardly see the 6th Gen having any trouble in the look department because most ppl still would pick the 13-14 mustang anyways! As far as this eco boost mustang , it's Ford doing what the do best eco boosting!

I want to see a 15 mustang that looks mean !

This.....I dont see the 15 being mean looking without a major facelift. Wheels and lowered stance aint gonna cut it.

Q'smuscle · 10-09-2014, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 87GNX

This.....I dont see the 15 being mean looking without a major facelift. Wheels and lowered stance aint gonna cut it.

Agree ! There's something weird about the looks !

crysalis_01 · 10-09-2014, 04:40 PM

SCT releases tuned results of 288.24 horsepower(+35) and 334.28 lb-ft of torque(+46) at the wheels, with a conservative/early tune. SCT believes there is more on the table.

http://www.svtperformance.com/?p=7289

I wonder why their stock run had a large discrepancy on output vs the other two dynos we have?

SCT
hp/tq
231.71/266.88

Woodbine
276.85/286.72

MotorTrend
279/295

I would assume that by lowballing the initial pull it makes the tune look more impressive. Either way 334.28 rwtq is a good start.

87GNX · 10-09-2014, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Q'smuscle

Agree ! There's something weird about the looks !

It has a round euro modern look to the front and a retro square rear end...makes no sense imo.

NASTY99Z28 · 10-09-2014, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife

That was a 5.0 PP (M6) that had a really, really bad launch. It was one of AmericanMuscle's development fleet GT's that couldn't get traction and was wheel-hopping.

I wonder if this will be a common problem with the manual cars and that's why the ford racing cars had the mods they had.

10-08-2014, 10:17 PM	#31
crysalis_01 Iron fist, lead foot Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Wyoming Posts: 1,228	Svtp's Facebook page just posted a vid from one of the guys at Woodbine (the guys who did the dyno test on page 1) running a 13.8@103mph. __________________ '03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 \|\| modded with mods'n'stuff

10-09-2014, 04:40 PM	#40
crysalis_01 Iron fist, lead foot Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Wyoming Posts: 1,228	SCT releases tuned results of 288.24 horsepower(+35) and 334.28 lb-ft of torque(+46) at the wheels, with a conservative/early tune. SCT believes there is more on the table. http://www.svtperformance.com/?p=7289 I wonder why their stock run had a large discrepancy on output vs the other two dynos we have? SCT hp/tq 231.71/266.88 Woodbine 276.85/286.72 MotorTrend 279/295 I would assume that by lowballing the initial pull it makes the tune look more impressive. Either way 334.28 rwtq is a good start. __________________ '03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 \|\| modded with mods'n'stuff Last edited by crysalis_01; 10-09-2014 at 04:53 PM.

10-09-2014, 10:52 AM	#32
BobDigi5060 Drives: 97' A4, 08' Mustang, 15' Legacy Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: TX Posts: 114	I saw someone post a 13.5 @ 109 mph.

User Name		Remember Me?
Password