Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Specific Packages / Variants > 6th gen Camaro 1LE


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2020, 10:35 PM   #1
Cswan11
 
Drives: 2018 Chevy Camaro SS 1le
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 7
Cam help

I have 2018 SS 1le. I’m wanting to get the Texas speed stage 2 cam kit. I’m still new in the car engine side of things and unsure what fuel lobe to get (0,10,32)

Also what rod length.

I am stock at the moment but eventually want a supercharger, would a 32 hurt me being a stock set up? I know I need it for the super. I would like to avoid buying a different cam later on.

Has anyone used the Katech AFM valley delete?

Thanks in advance.
Cswan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2020, 06:38 AM   #2
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,760
Definitely want the +32 fuel lobe regardless.

Get good quality lifters (Johnson is great), and measure for pushrod length during engine reassembly. Lot of threads on this topic as of late with some really good posts by oldman and KingLT1.

If you’re doing a supercharger down the road, then I’d get a cam that works with it. An NA cam is a different animal than one for say, a PD blower. NA cams typically have a bunch of overlap, not ideal for a supercharger. I’m sure it would work, but I’d prefer leaving a bit of NA power on the table instead of having to change the cam again.

I am running both the Katech AFM valley delete cover and the Katech VVT delete front timing cover. Nice pieces.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2020, 07:29 AM   #3
Cswan11
 
Drives: 2018 Chevy Camaro SS 1le
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
Definitely want the +32 fuel lobe regardless.

Get good quality lifters (Johnson is great), and measure for pushrod length during engine reassembly. Lot of threads on this topic as of late with some really good posts by oldman and KingLT1.

If you’re doing a supercharger down the road, then I’d get a cam that works with it. An NA cam is a different animal than one for say, a PD blower. NA cams typically have a bunch of overlap, not ideal for a supercharger. I’m sure it would work, but I’d prefer leaving a bit of NA power on the table instead of having to change the cam again.

I am running both the Katech AFM valley delete cover and the Katech VVT delete front timing cover. Nice pieces.
Thank you! I wanna build it the right way the first time or at least the best I can.
Cswan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2020, 07:39 AM   #4
JROC
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 19 Camaro SS 1LE, 03 Ford Lightning
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post

If you’re doing a supercharger down the road, then I’d get a cam that works with it. An NA cam is a different animal than one for say, a PD blower. NA cams typically have a bunch of overlap, not ideal for a supercharger. I’m sure it would work, but I’d prefer leaving a bit of NA power on the table instead of having to change the cam again.
This. I've known people with modern built blower motor with custom blower cams who's cam/cams barely produced a more noticeable lope than factory. A little bit, but not really all that much, but they put down some impressive #'s.

I knew a guy who owned a performance shop back in like 07/08/09 with an 03/04 Cobra (can't remember which year, but a screaming yellow car) with a 5L Teksid build. He had the heads ported and custom ground cams, running a GEN1 Whipple 2.3L making 735 WHP on 93. That was a lot back then. Before that he broke the 600 WHP mark with a stock bottomend, and a Steggy ported M112 with the same H/C's. This was also on pump. The point I'm getting at is he was making some very impressive # for the late 2,000's, and he contributed it greatly to his H/C setup, but the cam lope was barely more noticeable than factory. I once asked him why he used cams that didn't lope any more aggressively like a cammed LS car, and he started explaining that you want the valves to open differently for N/A and boosted cars, etc, and that you should spec your cams based on your setup. I've known people with built LS motors running a large shot who's motors weren't cammed overall aggressively. They would say they built the motor to survive a shot, and not necessarily make the most N/A HP.

If you think you're going to SC soon they you should spec your cam to work well with any particular SC you plan to use. A custom ground cam from a reputable source spec'd to your setup is usually better (but not necessarily always if you're doing a common build) than an off the shelf cam.
JROC is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.