10-19-2015, 05:11 PM | #15 |
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
|
It is a supercharged 6.2 DI OHV engine. It has some parts to handle boost the LT1 doesn't and has lower CR, but thet are similar.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
10-19-2015, 05:21 PM | #16 |
Drives: Ask. Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 30
|
The peak power figures are similar, but think about how much longer that Voodoo is making that peak; it hangs in for a solid thousand revs. You shift at the cutoff and you're essentially right back into the peak of the band.
|
10-19-2015, 06:46 PM | #17 |
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
That engine will never see low revs. But when it does go as low as its designed to it'll.still be in its peak power range olin both HP and torque. Along with tight aggressive gears it'll do just fine around a track. Plus it'll actually need to be shifted less because of the broad powerband. That in itself its huge over a duration of a race. Less time shifting and less wear on the trans/clutch with less chances of missing a shift.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
10-19-2015, 08:11 PM | #18 |
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
|
The Voodoo and LS7 power curves are ~1000 rpm apart. Slide either over 1000 rpm and they match each other fairly well. I.e. The bottom of the Voodoo isnt useful and above 6700 rpm the LS7 is done. The useful power band is in a different range
Torque is a whole different game
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
10-19-2015, 09:26 PM | #19 |
Drives: RS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,037
|
I will not be surprised if the Gen 5 Z/28 is faster than the GT350 or GT350R. Z/28 has better brakes and wider tires, not sure how the weights compare though.
|
10-19-2015, 09:36 PM | #20 |
Drives: 2012 SS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 818
|
In my racing experience, higher revving motors break more often. If I can make the same power revving between 4500 and 6500 rpm in a LS7, verse making the similar power levels revving between 6000 and 8000 rpm with a VooDoo, I will take the lower rpm, higher torque motor. Over heating is also more likely on long duration high rpm conditions. Yes the high rpm motor might be more fun, but parts breakage is not fun.
__________________
Buttonwillow 2:23.736
Sacramento Raceway 12.89 at 112 mph Thunderhill 2:22.242 |
10-19-2015, 09:38 PM | #21 |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
|
10-19-2015, 10:03 PM | #22 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2ss Join Date: May 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 1,559
|
I'm not knocking the Voodoo because I think it's an amazing engine and a great departure from the norm, but I love the power and curves from the ls7. I really hope GM can make an lt7 come to reality.
|
10-20-2015, 12:10 AM | #23 |
Iron fist, lead foot
Drives: 2003 Mustang Cobra Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,227
|
The low rpm torque output of Voodoo it seems is a little misunderstood. Perhaps it's because of such a huge jump it takes after the 3500 mark.
It's actually very similar, yes a bit lower, to the gen1 Coyote's torque output from say 1500 through 3500. At least from what dyno sheets I've seen for stock vehicles. Voodoo@1500rpm = 238tq .................2000rpm~ 260tq .................2500rpm~ 265tq .................3000rpm~ 290tq .................3500rpm~ 345tq Gen1 Coyote@1500rpm~ ? ........................ 2000rpm~ 270tq ........................ 2500rpm~ 280tq ........................ 3000rpm~ 295tq ........................ 3500rpm~ 330tq Just something I noticed. If I've made a mistake by all means let me know.
__________________
'03 SVT Cobra-SC4.6L V8 || modded with mods'n'stuff
|
10-20-2015, 12:54 AM | #24 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
It has a huge displacement advantage but is a 10 year old motor. Respectable on both ends.
An lt7 would be a beast. I would think 550hp should be doable under emission constraints etc. And that would be plenty. These are good numbers for the ls7. Haven't looked a whole lot lately but it seems I remember a lot of them being 440-450 rwhp stock when the c6z came out. |
10-20-2015, 06:37 AM | #25 | |
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
|
Quote:
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
|
10-20-2015, 06:44 AM | #26 |
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
It'll never be that low in the Rev range. If it even comes close then you simply downshift. Ford adds plenty of gear to keep it up where it needs to be.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
10-20-2015, 07:37 AM | #27 |
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
|
Right. Just realize that dropping a gear won't create rpm if you're not moving. It needs momentum and probably won't be a very satisfying street car
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
10-20-2015, 07:48 AM | #28 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|