16 SS vs 17 GT (Dyno Day)

OleGreg · 04-17-2017, 07:32 PM

Went to a dyno day with a buddy that has a 17 5.0, both cars are bone stock with axle back exhausts. My car is a m6, his is a a6.

First pull I made 421whp, he made 367whp.

Second pull I made 425whp/435tq, he made 367whp again.

https://youtu.be/ODn5aUe1GDg

https://youtu.be/_pvZRtmGO70

L99BEN · 04-17-2017, 08:04 PM

Nice!

To be fair, the auto will obviously dyno lower than the manual.

OleGreg · 04-17-2017, 08:55 PM

There were a few m6 fbo 5.0s that didn't even break 420whp.

Fraxum · 04-18-2017, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L99BEN

Nice!

To be fair, the auto will obviously dyno lower than the manual.

And to be fair that Mustang 5.0 auto is just about as fast as a M6 CA6 SS at the dragstrip despite the perceived power difference.

OleGreg · 04-18-2017, 12:31 PM

I've been 7.83@93 on the oem tires, he's ran a best of 8.06@89 on his drag pack

L99BEN · 04-18-2017, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fraxum

And to be fair that Mustang 5.0 auto is just about as fast as a M6 CA6 SS at the dragstrip despite the perceived power difference.

Coming from the coyote 5.0 world myself, I'm greatly aware of the their capabilities.

BlaqWhole · 04-19-2017, 06:19 AM

Yea the Camaros make more hp to the wheels than the Stangs do. By quite a bit. And that trans in the automatic SS makes it a beast. I think M6 to M6 tho, the SS would still have more HP, but the car would perform a bit closer. Once forced induction is added to both cars is when I think the Stang eclipses the SS.

Redlinez · 04-19-2017, 07:05 AM

I knew I wasn't gonna have the $$$ to go blown on my 15 GT. That is where they shine. On motor though, there is simply no comparison. 435 lbft to the wheels???? Let me tell you with the torque and DI, it's no contest as to which one is more fun to drive day to day. I went 8.10 @ 90 on Conti DW's in my Stang with Stainlessworks catted longtubes, Palm Beach Dyno tune, resonator delete, MGW shifter. And that was at an awesome sticky track slipping the clutch some. I beat several "faster" cars that day. I watched a Viper running 8.50's-8.60's.

FastCarFanBoy · 04-19-2017, 08:41 AM

your car dynod abnormally high and your buddies dyno'd abnormally low.

Chadicus · 04-19-2017, 12:14 PM

Having previously owned 2 coyote 5.0s 367 is a bit low. My last one (2015 pp) was 383 stock. However the difference between the two cars performance wise is rather large. The 5.0 in automatic form can't get the 3.73 axel or the performance pack parts. I believe in a 1/4 mile race the auto and pp Mustangs run about deadeven.

Michigan1LTRS · 04-19-2017, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy

your car dynod abnormally high and your buddies dyno'd abnormally low.

Same dyno, same day. Apple's to Apple's.

zx9rmal · 04-19-2017, 12:36 PM

<First pull I made 421whp Second pull I made 425whp/435tq.>

Newbie here. Just got my new 1LE. Wow. Are these numbers for a stock motor? Please tell me yes.

rontammy0 · 04-19-2017, 01:11 PM

At 421 rwhp based on average of 20% drivetrain loss for the auto....that puts you at 505 crank hp.

SuperSound · 04-19-2017, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rontammy0

At 421 rwhp based on average of 20% drivetrain loss for the auto....that puts you at 505 crank hp.

He's an M6 and the losses on these 8 spds (Dodges too) is closer to 12%.

04-17-2017, 07:32 PM	#1
OleGreg Drives: 16' 1SS Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: Florence, Al Posts: 20	16 SS vs 17 GT (Dyno Day) Went to a dyno day with a buddy that has a 17 5.0, both cars are bone stock with axle back exhausts. My car is a m6, his is a a6. First pull I made 421whp, he made 367whp. Second pull I made 425whp/435tq, he made 367whp again. https://youtu.be/ODn5aUe1GDg https://youtu.be/_pvZRtmGO70 Attached Images __________________ 16' SS - Soon to be racecar status

04-17-2017, 08:04 PM	#2
L99BEN Drives: 2023 BMW M4 Competition Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: USA Posts: 657	Nice! To be fair, the auto will obviously dyno lower than the manual. __________________ 2023 BMW M4 Competition (daily) 2022 ZLE M6 (weekend toy) 2022 BMW X3m40i Past: 2022 Tesla S Plaid 2020 Shelby GT500 sold 2019 Hellcat Redeye-traded for new GT500 2019 ZL1 A10 - sold (meh) 2019 Tesla M3P 2016 Hellcat Challenger - A8 sold but never forgotten 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 2014 Mustang GT A6 2012 Mustang GT M6 "brembo" 3.73/FBO 2012 Camaro SS L99 (Wife's)- slow

04-17-2017, 08:55 PM	#3
OleGreg Drives: 16' 1SS Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: Florence, Al Posts: 20	There were a few m6 fbo 5.0s that didn't even break 420whp. Attached Images __________________ 16' SS - Soon to be racecar status

04-18-2017, 12:31 PM	#5
OleGreg Drives: 16' 1SS Join Date: Nov 2016 Location: Florence, Al Posts: 20	I've been 7.83@93 on the oem tires, he's ran a best of 8.06@89 on his drag pack __________________ 16' SS - Soon to be racecar status

04-19-2017, 07:05 AM	#8
Redlinez Shifts under load Drives: 2020 Camaro 1SS 1LE rally green Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC Posts: 1,295	I knew I wasn't gonna have the $$$ to go blown on my 15 GT. That is where they shine. On motor though, there is simply no comparison. 435 lbft to the wheels???? Let me tell you with the torque and DI, it's no contest as to which one is more fun to drive day to day. I went 8.10 @ 90 on Conti DW's in my Stang with Stainlessworks catted longtubes, Palm Beach Dyno tune, resonator delete, MGW shifter. And that was at an awesome sticky track slipping the clutch some. I beat several "faster" cars that day. I watched a Viper running 8.50's-8.60's. __________________ 24 Audi S3 prem plus, sport package HPDE - southeast - JTI- solo, PCA- blue. 22 Suzuki GSX-S 1000GT blue

04-19-2017, 06:19 AM	#7
BlaqWhole Account Suspended Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012 Location: NJ Posts: 7,692	Yea the Camaros make more hp to the wheels than the Stangs do. By quite a bit. And that trans in the automatic SS makes it a beast. I think M6 to M6 tho, the SS would still have more HP, but the car would perform a bit closer. Once forced induction is added to both cars is when I think the Stang eclipses the SS.

04-19-2017, 08:41 AM	#9
FastCarFanBoy Banned Drives: 2013 GB GT Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: Florida Posts: 954	your car dynod abnormally high and your buddies dyno'd abnormally low.

04-19-2017, 12:14 PM	#10
Chadicus Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Billings MT Posts: 773	Having previously owned 2 coyote 5.0s 367 is a bit low. My last one (2015 pp) was 383 stock. However the difference between the two cars performance wise is rather large. The 5.0 in automatic form can't get the 3.73 axel or the performance pack parts. I believe in a 1/4 mile race the auto and pp Mustangs run about deadeven.

04-19-2017, 12:36 PM	#12
zx9rmal Drives: '20 ZL1 M6 Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: FT. Lauderdale, FL Posts: 717	<First pull I made 421whp Second pull I made 425whp/435tq.> Newbie here. Just got my new 1LE. Wow. Are these numbers for a stock motor? Please tell me yes. __________________ Mal Ft. Lauderdale, FL '20 Camaro ZL1 M6 '22 Kawasaki ZX-14R

04-19-2017, 01:11 PM	#13
rontammy0 Account Suspended Drives: 2011 2SS/ RS INFERNO ORANGE L99 Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Alliston Ontario Canada Posts: 9,057 View My Garage	At 421 rwhp based on average of 20% drivetrain loss for the auto....that puts you at 505 crank hp.

User Name		Remember Me?
Password