03-26-2016, 10:53 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS 6SP/Suby Legacy 6 Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 844
|
The 4 piston brakes stop better than the M4 with the 9000$ brake upgrade. You do the math!
__________________
TFPK40
Its Here! Finally came home on 3-31-16! Red Hot 2SS,6 Speed, NPP, MRC, Adrenaline Red interior, Silver Rally Stripes, NAV, Sunroof, 56W Split Spoke Wheels, Body color Hood vents, Body color Splash Guards and winter protection package. Ordered 1-28-16: 1100 2-11-2016 :2000 2-15-2016: 3000 TPW of 3/7...That went quick! 2-26-2016: 3400 Status TPW 3/7 3-5-2016 : 3800 3-8-2016 : 4300 3-11-2016 : 4B00 3-15-2016 : 4200 3-22-2016 : 4800 3-29-2016 : 6000! |
03-27-2016, 12:43 AM | #16 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 771
|
While I agree with others, it's about what you're looking for in a car. I have the 6 piston package and wouldn't have it any other way - but I love a good immediate and solid brake pedal. Don't forget, you also get bigger (14.6") two piece rotors. They should be a couple pounds lighter than the smaller fully cast iron units... and more than offset a bigger caliper. I'm also going to upgrade the rear rotor to a two-piece unit, I'll keep the stock size and caliper though.
Benefits of bigger/better rotor and caliper systems from my experience: * Better stopping power above 80MPH * Much better pedal feel - immediate bite with complete control over brake modulation * Less unsprung and rotating mass - very big and overlooked benefit I'm not saying the stock 4 piston setup is bad - like everyone mentioned, braking performance from 60MPH rivals that of an M4... and I haven't heard anyone mention excessive brake fade during track use. If you're used to multi-piece non-radially mounted calipers and all iron rotors - the Camaro 4 pistons will be amazing.
__________________
|
03-27-2016, 02:40 AM | #17 |
Drives: SW 1SS 1LE / Jeep XJ Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: WPB,FL
Posts: 799
|
Won't stop any shorter, 6pots are more for track use as the two peice Rotor helps dramatically with wheel bearings temps, also as well as the rotor being bigger you have more heat capacity.
Though there may not be cheap aftermarket two peice Rotors so keep that in mind. |
03-27-2016, 03:02 AM | #18 | |
You can only YOLO once.
Drives: '16 2SS & '15 Subaru Forester Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Albany, OR
Posts: 1,677
|
Quote:
One thing that people don't understand is that rotor diameter and tires contribute more to braking ability than how many pots your calipers have.
__________________
2016 Camaro 2ss
-Summit White / Ceramic White -8A, NPP, MRC, Ceramic White package plus knee pads, black bowties. -1st Car to have the "full" SEMA High Performance Graphics kit from 6LEDesigns. -1st Car to have the 6LEDesigns Blade Spoiler. -Borla S-Type w/ custom H-Pipe -Procharger P-1X Stage 2 |
|
03-27-2016, 06:30 AM | #19 | |
Daily Driver 24/7 365
Drives: '15 CRT 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 827
|
Quote:
__________________
NPP Fuse Pull, Z28 CAI =
Previous Rides: 2005 Magnum R/T A5 CAI, Cat-Back 2014 RRM Camaro 1LT/RS A6/NPP CAI Follow Me On Instagram! |
|
03-27-2016, 07:12 AM | #20 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Garnet Red Camaro Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 840
|
I'm convinced that buying the 4-piston break kit would have been perfect for my driving style, however, like a kid in a candy store I had to have the 6-piston brake kit. I'm happy with my choice.
__________________
Ordered: 8/8/15, 2SS Garnet Red
Built: 10/14/15 Current: Took Delivery, 12/24/15 Added Procharger supercharger. |
03-27-2016, 07:31 AM | #21 | |
Drives: 2016 camaro 2ss NGM Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 342
|
Quote:
|
|
03-27-2016, 07:40 AM | #22 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
|
Quote:
? For rotating mass, it's also important how far from the centerline it is, which I don't think you are taking in to account with your analysis above. |
|
03-27-2016, 10:08 AM | #23 |
Drives: 2014 shelby Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: rocky mountains
Posts: 31
|
I had the same question when I ordered mine. Then I found out you can buy the 6 brembo package from Chevy.
http://www.chevrolet.com/performance...arts/2016.html I have seen it advertised for $2100, US. Made the decision a no-brainer. Went with the 4 piston. can always upgrade to 6 and save some coin. |
03-27-2016, 10:44 AM | #24 |
Drives: 2012 Grabber Blue Mustang GT/CS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Montreal
Posts: 13
|
Thanks for all the input guys, I just wanted to make sure I was choosing what would be best for me and not the cheaper option. Im going to go with the 4 piston brakes it sounds like the better set up for me
|
03-28-2016, 12:17 PM | #25 | ||
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 771
|
Quote:
Quote:
You're right that rotating mass closer to the center is less important, but 5lbs per wheel is a lot. The unsprung mass will also improve suspension performance, even in every day driving. Edit: I agree that all that might not be worth 3k to everyone...
__________________
Last edited by crankaholic; 03-30-2016 at 09:58 AM. |
||
03-29-2016, 03:33 PM | #26 | |
Drives: 2018 1SS 1LE & 1973 Datsun 240Z Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 574
|
Quote:
Regardless, the reality is that most of these front big brake kits are sized to produce equal or only modestly more brake torque than what they are replacing, regardless of how many pistons the calliper has or how big the rotor is. The reason for this is that, outside of a certain margin, without a proportionate increase in rear brake torque, braking distances will actually start to get longer with a substantial increase in front brake torque. So, you can't simply slap on huge rotors and callipers with big pistons and/or high friction pads on the front only and expect the car to stop shorter. The opposite will happen. I haven't seen the specs for the gen 6 Camaro 4 and 6 pot callipers, but for example, the gen 5 6 pot callipers had a slightly smaller total piston area than the 4 pots, despite the extra pistons. This was to compensate for the added torque of the larger rotor without upsetting the front to rear brake balance. Of course, there are other factors that influence braking engineering/performance. But brake bias is probably one of the least well understood issues, with many people assuming that a "big" front brake kit means substantially more brake torque, which is just not the case. Nigel |
|
04-05-2016, 07:34 AM | #27 |
Drives: 2023Porsche Cayenne S Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: everywhere and no where
Posts: 317
|
Keep the 4 pots and if later you need buy the 6 pots then you can sell the 4pots to v6 or I4 Camaro owners. I think you pay more if you buy with dealer installed and don't keep the 4 pots to begin with.
|
04-12-2016, 08:17 PM | #28 |
Drives: '19 SS 1LE/'19 Rubicon/'20 AT4 Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 505
|
it seems like most of the input here is subjective. i'd say that for your purposes the 4pot should be more than enough and chances are you'll never use even 1/2 of their potential if you're just commuting with the car. that's a good thing, by the way!
this is a lot like the steel vs carbon ceramic debate in the M3/4 forum. the guys with the $8k carbon ceramics swear by them, but the rest of us stop just fine using our steel rotors and track pads (pagid rs29 in my case). the other thing to consider is eventual repair/replacement costs for the larger, more expensive brakes. my guess is that the 6pot is considerably more expensive but i can't find data on it right now as far as rotors/pads go. sounds like you are going for the 4 pot. i'll do the same if i choose the 1ss and i'll do my best to flog it and see how it does. i'm pretty pumped to see what the 1LE churns out though... |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|