Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2019, 07:39 PM   #2451
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
Thanks for the input, as always!

Send us a link to the show, I would love to watch.
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 07:12 AM   #2452
DevilsReject97
Nightmare
 
DevilsReject97's Avatar
 
Drives: Your mom crazy in bed
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naptown
Posts: 2,438
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2019/06/...vrolet-camaro/

Delayed, not cancelled
__________________
DevilsReject97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 07:18 AM   #2453
TheRealJA105

 
TheRealJA105's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 C6Z06
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 1,577
GM should wait until the new Mustang and Challenger come out to make sure they Trump them. Kinda like Ford is trying to do with this stupid GT500, that's still going to lose around a track to a ZLE.
TheRealJA105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 07:41 AM   #2454
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
Exactly. The Camaro was not a big seller. But I think it has definitely been a big money maker for GM. Remember, the Camaro was selling at some pretty high prices. Some of the fully loaded 2SS Camaros was right on the door steps of base 1LT Vette prices. So I do not think GM is doing bad at all. I do not think the Camaro is going anywhere. It will be around for a long time.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 08:08 AM   #2455
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
I love the delay - keeps the 6th gen around longer and makes a big case to have an LT5 powered Camaro.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 08:52 AM   #2456
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
I love the delay - keeps the 6th gen around longer and makes a big case to have an LT5 powered Camaro.
It seems like folks have been pulled from the Camaro project to other priorities, so it doesn't seem like (at least for now) there are any plans for an LT5 Camaro.

BUT, adding time to the Gen6 definately gives room in the timeline between the C8 and Gen7 for either an LT5 Gen6 Camaro or a N/A Z/28.

N/A Z/28??? WELL, rumors are the C8 will debut with a reworked LT1 (let's call it the LT2). The LT2 seems like a candidate for the Gen7 SS engine. But the next engine in the C8 lineup is rumored to be a 5.5L DOHC FPC N/A motor good for 600+ HP. That engine would make a great 6th Gen Z/28 motor. BUT, under the old 6th Gen schdule, it would be too late to the party to go in the 6th Gen. Now that the 6th Gen has been extended two years, that gives time for a N/A Z/28.

Assuming the new C8 is a 2020MY, the 5.5L engine could debut as a 2021MY. That means the Camaro can have it in 2022 or 2023MY. This aligns nicely with the extended Camaro schdule. Plus, the Alpha chassis is already ahead of the competition, so there is no need to do backflips to get the Camaro on a new chassis.

If it were up to me, I would upgrade the ZL1 to the LT5 engine in 2021MY with a refresh of the outer looks and inner tech, then debut the Z/28 with the 5.5L in 2022MY.

I know that won't happen, but part of it could (either or).

Better looks and MOAR POWWAR would sell better. Just sayin....
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 10:01 AM   #2457
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
"Indefinitely delayed"
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 10:30 AM   #2458
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
"Indefinitely delayed"
Still better than the current 2009 Challenger platform...not plans to replace it anytime soon.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 10:36 AM   #2459
rocket403

 
rocket403's Avatar
 
Drives: 80 Cutlass 403, 2010 FF RT
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 921
I take the Challenger any day and twice on Sundays lol
rocket403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 01:39 PM   #2460
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Exactly. The Camaro was not a big seller. But I think it has definitely been a big money maker for GM. Remember, the Camaro was selling at some pretty high prices. Some of the fully loaded 2SS Camaros was right on the door steps of base 1LT Vette prices. So I do not think GM is doing bad at all. I do not think the Camaro is going anywhere. It will be around for a long time.
Like I mentioned in the other thread, while there was some evidence that could make you go hmmm I could see it going away the Camaro's importance is more tied in with Cadillac and needing Camaro volume to sustain the activity at the plant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
It seems like folks have been pulled from the Camaro project to other priorities, so it doesn't seem like (at least for now) there are any plans for an LT5 Camaro.

BUT, adding time to the Gen6 definately gives room in the timeline between the C8 and Gen7 for either an LT5 Gen6 Camaro or a N/A Z/28.

N/A Z/28??? WELL, rumors are the C8 will debut with a reworked LT1 (let's call it the LT2). The LT2 seems like a candidate for the Gen7 SS engine. But the next engine in the C8 lineup is rumored to be a 5.5L DOHC FPC N/A motor good for 600+ HP. That engine would make a great 6th Gen Z/28 motor. BUT, under the old 6th Gen schdule, it would be too late to the party to go in the 6th Gen. Now that the 6th Gen has been extended two years, that gives time for a N/A Z/28.

Assuming the new C8 is a 2020MY, the 5.5L engine could debut as a 2021MY. That means the Camaro can have it in 2022 or 2023MY. This aligns nicely with the extended Camaro schdule. Plus, the Alpha chassis is already ahead of the competition, so there is no need to do backflips to get the Camaro on a new chassis.

If it were up to me, I would upgrade the ZL1 to the LT5 engine in 2021MY with a refresh of the outer looks and inner tech, then debut the Z/28 with the 5.5L in 2022MY.

I know that won't happen, but part of it could (either or).

Better looks and MOAR POWWAR would sell better. Just sayin....
I know those are just rumors, I see absolutely no way the C8 has a 5.5L FPC.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 02:18 PM   #2461
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
I know those are just rumors, I see absolutely no way the C8 has a 5.5L FPC.
C8 will have a derivative of the 4.2L Cadillac blackwing. The CAD drawings have been leaked for over a year showing the exact same engine architecture with low, side mounted turbos rather than the hot V setup in the front engine Caddy config. All other components (heads, block, belt routing) show identical dimensions and pathways as the Blackwing DOHC TT V8. The displacement for the C8 is what is in question. Also, we know that this will be a higher-model engine, the base C8 is getting an LT2 (hotter LT1 pushrod V8).
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 03:17 PM   #2462
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
C8 will have a derivative of the 4.2L Cadillac blackwing. The CAD drawings have been leaked for over a year showing the exact same engine architecture with low, side mounted turbos rather than the hot V setup in the front engine Caddy config. All other components (heads, block, belt routing) show identical dimensions and pathways as the Blackwing DOHC TT V8. The displacement for the C8 is what is in question. Also, we know that this will be a higher-model engine, the base C8 is getting an LT2 (hotter LT1 pushrod V8).
I think what chaffe is referring to is the flat plane crank part of all this. The theoretical limit to a FPC engine is about 5.0L. And the Voodoo is 5.2, and has the reliability of PooPoo. So, it seems safe to assume that going up to 5.5L will be an even bigger challenge. And, I agree with this to an extent.

Here is why I said "to an extent". First of all, the Voodoo has a different firing order than a traditional FPC engine, and that effects vibration a bunch. So, it's an apples to oranges comparison. Also, the theoretical limit in terms of vibration for a inline 4 cylinder is 2.0L. We see tons of I4's with more than 2.0L, and they do that by introducing balance shafts. I'm not entirely sure here, but a balance shaft could be added to a 5.5L FPC engine, and smooth out the harshness, but you add to the rotating mass. That kind of defeats some of the purpose of an FPC engine. BUT, not if the ultimate end game is to slap some turbos on it (which the rumors are the 5.5L engine will go TT later). So, a 5.5L FPC with balance shafts seems like it may work. It won't spin up quite as fast, but it won't spin up slow either. But the reduced displacemet gives more room for fuel efficiency also. And the DOHC and FPC will allow it to put the peak HP up high in the RPM range.

It's fun to speculate, but all that is pure conjecture on my part. AND, it's conjecture based off of rumors, so...
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 03:30 PM   #2463
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
I think what chaffe is referring to is the flat plane crank part of all this. The theoretical limit to a FPC engine is about 5.0L. And the Voodoo is 5.2, and has the reliability of PooPoo. So, it seems safe to assume that going up to 5.5L will be an even bigger challenge. And, I agree with this to an extent.

Here is why I said "to an extent". First of all, the Voodoo has a different firing order than a traditional FPC engine, and that effects vibration a bunch. So, it's an apples to oranges comparison. Also, the theoretical limit in terms of vibration for a inline 4 cylinder is 2.0L. We see tons of I4's with more than 2.0L, and they do that by introducing balance shafts. I'm not entirely sure here, but a balance shaft could be added to a 5.5L FPC engine, and smooth out the harshness, but you add to the rotating mass. That kind of defeats some of the purpose of an FPC engine. BUT, not if the ultimate end game is to slap some turbos on it (which the rumors are the 5.5L engine will go TT later). So, a 5.5L FPC with balance shafts seems like it may work. It won't spin up quite as fast, but it won't spin up slow either. But the reduced displacemet gives more room for fuel efficiency also. And the DOHC and FPC will allow it to put the peak HP up high in the RPM range.

It's fun to speculate, but all that is pure conjecture on my part. AND, it's conjecture based off of rumors, so...
My bad then, agree on no FPC for C8
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2019, 10:58 PM   #2464
Turkish01
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Florida
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinjlm View Post
The idea that Cam6 on Alpha is being extended (like Mustang on S550 being extended) is consistent with things I have seen. Other things in the article are speculation with no confirmation. That’s the best I can do today.

BTW - I will be a guest on Autoline After Hours on Thursday 3:00. Even though the plan was certainly not around discussing Camaro, I’d be stupid to think it won’t come up. If it does, that will pretty much be my response.
I watch autoline AA every week. That’s awesome that your going to be on it. Look forward to it and congratulations to you.
Turkish01 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.