JL Audio PWM110-JXWXv2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

coryrulez9 · 03-27-2015, 11:54 PM

Anyone have experience with the JL Audio PWM110-JXWXv2? It is a powered sub much like the Rockford P10-300. Was wondering if anyone tried it out yet as it should be better than the RF based on specs.

http://www.jlaudio.com/pwm110-jxwxv2...-systems-93248

coryrulez9 · 03-30-2015, 07:54 PM

bump

Snoman · 03-31-2015, 12:33 PM

Is the P10-300 an older model or were you referencing their current Punch P1? http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/products/details/p300-10

I don't have either, but based on the specs compared to the P300-10;

The JL has a higher efficiency, 86db vs 84db @ 1w/1m
The JL is tuned lower (49 vs 54hz)
The JL has significantly lower dampening (Qtc); ~.74 vs .83 (lower is better, 0.707 - 0.900)
The RF will draw less power as it seems RF used their 2 ohm sub to inflate the wattage rating. Small note, the manual for this sub either incorrectly has a misprint for their Qts (0.59) or their suggested sealed box design is completely wrong.

The RF weighs less, has less power and will not sound as loud therefore the JL has better specs on paper.

It's going to be personal preference though, the JL is more transparent with their specific product information available. Since they are the same price, I'd go with the JL.

03-27-2015, 11:54 PM	#1
coryrulez9 Drives: 2014 Camaro 2LS Blue Ray Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Columbus Posts: 204	JL Audio PWM110-JXWXv2 Anyone have experience with the JL Audio PWM110-JXWXv2? It is a powered sub much like the Rockford P10-300. Was wondering if anyone tried it out yet as it should be better than the RF based on specs. http://www.jlaudio.com/pwm110-jxwxv2...-systems-93248

03-30-2015, 07:54 PM	#2
coryrulez9 Drives: 2014 Camaro 2LS Blue Ray Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Columbus Posts: 204	bump

03-31-2015, 12:33 PM	#3
Snoman H-Town Camaro Club Drives: 2013 Dusk Edition 2SS/M6/Sun/NPP Join Date: May 2014 Location: Houston Posts: 2,234 View My Garage	Is the P10-300 an older model or were you referencing their current Punch P1? http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/products/details/p300-10 I don't have either, but based on the specs compared to the P300-10; The JL has a higher efficiency, 86db vs 84db @ 1w/1m The JL is tuned lower (49 vs 54hz) The JL has significantly lower dampening (Qtc); ~.74 vs .83 (lower is better, 0.707 - 0.900) The RF will draw less power as it seems RF used their 2 ohm sub to inflate the wattage rating. Small note, the manual for this sub either incorrectly has a misprint for their Qts (0.59) or their suggested sealed box design is completely wrong. The RF weighs less, has less power and will not sound as loud therefore the JL has better specs on paper. It's going to be personal preference though, the JL is more transparent with their specific product information available. Since they are the same price, I'd go with the JL.