Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2018, 04:31 PM   #57
cbr1100xx
Account Suspended
 
Drives: '14 Jetta 1.8, '19 1SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRZ06 View Post

It's pretty unusable for a MFG. to admit a cosmetic mistake and fix it that fast.
VERY unusable!
cbr1100xx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 04:35 PM   #58
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
Pricing people out is the primary reason of sales issues, not a frontend fascia for their V8 trim.

They talk about that in the linked article.

Chevy moved the camaro into a different demographic than it traditionally had, one that requires the performance that the camaro brings to the table, but they also demand a subtle style. Chevy retained a traditional style, aggressive almost to a teenage-male level ...but that style had always been attractive to the previous demographic, not the new one they priced the camaro into.

So it's not doing well. Surprise. You're not cross-shopping BMW drivers with the way a camaro looks. They need to do what they can to reduce the bottom trim level ...if that means lower performance / handling, then that's what they need to do. That's what the camaro buying public expect and look for. Then they use the aftermarket to make it as good as they want it where they want it themselves on their own time.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 04:46 PM   #59
GelflingEssence
Banned
 
Drives: 2016 Challenger SRT 392
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb114 View Post
I do not see them changing it to late , Too many built already some have been delivered.
Anything can happen. The new design was almost universally hated.

The "fugly" '19 could end up being very collectable.
GelflingEssence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 04:53 PM   #60
TRZ06

 
TRZ06's Avatar
 
Drives: 22' Porsche PDK GT4
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by cellsafemode View Post
Pricing people out is the primary reason of sales issues, not a frontend fascia for their V8 trim.

They talk about that in the linked article.

Chevy moved the camaro into a different demographic than it traditionally had, one that requires the performance that the camaro brings to the table, but they also demand a subtle style. Chevy retained a traditional style, aggressive almost to a teenage-male level ...but that style had always been attractive to the previous demographic, not the new one they priced the camaro into.

So it's not doing well. Surprise. You're not cross-shopping BMW drivers with the way a camaro looks. They need to do what they can to reduce the bottom trim level ...if that means lower performance / handling, then that's what they need to do. That's what the camaro buying public expect and look for. Then they use the aftermarket to make it as good as they want it where they want it themselves on their own time.
I disagree with the BMW and aftermarket comments.

I came from a 2016 BMW M3.

Also, what you soon realize with having to go aftermarket (especially when you get into suspension) is that it is very easy to screw things up or introduce other issues.

I applaud GM for making the SS 1LE and ZL1 1LE for that matter.. Being able to buy a car of this performance caliber without having to go aftermarket OR having to spend 6 figures is AMAZING!!!

Yes, it moves it up a notch, but at least with the 6 Gen., you get your moneys worth. They did the brakes proper, they did the suspension proper, they did the chassis proper, they did the wheel/tire package proper.

I love this car WAY more than my M3.

Unfortunately for GM, the market for sports car is not that great. We are a niche market. Crossovers and SUV's are the rage right now.

So, while you make some valid points, I do not agree with that BMW shoppers are not cross shopping, nor do I agree about the aftermarket.
__________________
Current:
22' Porsche PDK GT4 (MCS 2-way remote dampers)

Previous:
18' NFG 2SS 1LE (ZL1 1LE solid rear cradle bushings & Corsa Exhaust)
16' F80 M3 (Ohlin R/T Coilovers)
13' Audi TTRS (APR Stage 1, MSS Springs)
09' C6 Z06
08' E90 M3
06' 335i (KW V2 Coilovers)
03' C5 Z06
TRZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 05:08 PM   #61
cellsafemode


 
cellsafemode's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
Aftermarket bulges in two places. Low income car owners and racers. Where it doesn't bulge, the people who make up the leasing demographic.

So i get where you're coming from with your stance on the aftermarket.



I wanted to make the argument that the low income demographic was priced out of the camaro but in further research, i dont think that argument can be legitimately made.

The camaro is not doing bad for being a niche market car, it's doing bad compared to other cars within the same niche market. It's even cheaper than it's rivals who are doing better with crappier performing cars. So what gives?

1. The demographics did shift, but not due to the car being priced higher than traditionally. The income levels of their demographic has shrunk over time (factory workers and traditionally blue collar men). So those buyers are priced out of all new sports cars in general. The new demographic isn't a fan of the almost childishly aggressive look of the camaro compared to the alternatives.

2. Not making the vehicle available rhd from the get-go. While the market for RHD may be small, and in areas where american cars in general are a small market, there's no excuse for allowing your competition to not have any competition in an entire market. Especially one that gets their opinions about all cars heard around the world.
cellsafemode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 05:17 PM   #62
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRZ06 View Post
The 2 things I REALLY wanted from the 2019 were the LED Headlights and the new higher res. rear view camera.
I'd like the LED headlights as well, those I like the '16-'18 headlight assembly design better.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1SS, M6, Hurst shifter, Hyper Blue, NPP, Gray Split Spoke Wheels

Best 1/4 Mile: 12.24 @ 115.9 mph
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 05:24 PM   #63
TRZ06

 
TRZ06's Avatar
 
Drives: 22' Porsche PDK GT4
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtirocz View Post
I'd like the LED headlights as well, those I like the '16-'18 headlight assembly design better.
Yeah , from a design perspective, they both look good. It's the actual light output that is very different.

Driving on the freeway, you can immediately tell which cars have LED's and which have HID's.

It's crazy. When I am next to a car with LED's , it makes my car look like it has halogens, lol.

You can match the LED color with a 6K HID bulb, but you can not match its light output or spread. You see so much more of the road and its better lit up with LED.
__________________
Current:
22' Porsche PDK GT4 (MCS 2-way remote dampers)

Previous:
18' NFG 2SS 1LE (ZL1 1LE solid rear cradle bushings & Corsa Exhaust)
16' F80 M3 (Ohlin R/T Coilovers)
13' Audi TTRS (APR Stage 1, MSS Springs)
09' C6 Z06
08' E90 M3
06' 335i (KW V2 Coilovers)
03' C5 Z06
TRZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 05:40 PM   #64
lt4camaro


 
lt4camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 LT1 10 speed auto
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
Keep it simple and don't think about it. The 2019 SS front end sucked and they fixed it. Congrats to Camaro.
lt4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2018, 10:51 PM   #65
Cgocifer

 
Cgocifer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 1SS 1LE, 2015 RAM Ecodiesel
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,451
Honestly, to save the camaro, they need to fast track a gen 7 with a completely new design to fix the vis issue (doesnt bother me, I'm used to it), implement a sophisticated yet aggressive design that still resembles a camaro, and give the awesome performance platform the class and looks it deserves. The 911 Porsche has kept the same shape and profile for decades yet still looks modern and fresh with the evolution of a great design. Camaro can do the same if GM learns to stop jumping on every new trend. Just create a gorgeous design that still resembles somewhat of a Camaro and it will sell.

I'm still surprised that the pre refresh 6th gen did so poorly. I think it is gorgeous especially in 1LE trim, but I digress.
__________________
Cgocifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 12:11 AM   #66
Mr Carrots
 
Drives: Bmw for now
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRZ06 View Post
I disagree with the BMW and aftermarket comments.

I came from a 2016 BMW M3.

Also, what you soon realize with having to go aftermarket (especially when you get into suspension) is that it is very easy to screw things up or introduce other issues.

I applaud GM for making the SS 1LE and ZL1 1LE for that matter.. Being able to buy a car of this performance caliber without having to go aftermarket OR having to spend 6 figures is AMAZING!!!

Yes, it moves it up a notch, but at least with the 6 Gen., you get your moneys worth. They did the brakes proper, they did the suspension proper, they did the chassis proper, they did the wheel/tire package proper.

I love this car WAY more than my M3.

Unfortunately for GM, the market for sports car is not that great. We are a niche market. Crossovers and SUV's are the rage right now.

So, while you make some valid points, I do not agree with that BMW shoppers are not cross shopping, nor do I agree about the aftermarket.
BMWs are now massively overpriced and you need to mod that 80k M4 to get close to stock ZL1 performance, so there are definitely former BMW owners who switched.

Their mid range b58 engines are still not able to be modded to match the ageing n55 or n54, and their high end m5 is ridiculously expensive.

But yes, the badge snobs who buy or lease a optioned out 4 banger 3 series for 600+ a month are most of their market, and they arent going camaro
Mr Carrots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 12:23 AM   #67
JamesNoBrakes


 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AK
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cgocifer View Post
Honestly, to save the camaro, they need to fast track a gen 7 with a completely new design to fix the vis issue
Got that covered, no more complaining about visibility, entry and exit, high sills and other sports-car "problems". Gen 7 is ready to go:
Attached Images
 
__________________
Everything happens for a reason, except when it doesn't, but even then, you can, in hindsight, fabricate a reason that satisfies your belief system.

2018 2SS 1LE
2023 Colorado ZR2
2022 Stinger GT-line AWD
JamesNoBrakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 05:36 AM   #68
Subcool
 
Drives: 2022 SS 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: michigan
Posts: 178
Is that a new color on that awesome design or is it krypton Green?
Subcool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 05:57 AM   #69
V8 Firebird
 
V8 Firebird's Avatar
 
Drives: ⚡Electric TM3 ⚡
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Don't ask me
Posts: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subcool View Post
Is that a new color on that awesome design or is it krypton Green?
That is new color "Shock" , and it is Bright yellow replacement, not Krypton Green.
__________________
I always miss that awesome bird.
V8 Firebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2018, 06:31 AM   #70
lawguy85
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1SS Silver Ice Metallic
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Smyrna, GA
Posts: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb114 View Post
I do not see them changing it to late , Too many built already some have been delivered.
Source?? I'm not seeing any here in Atlanta. The top 3 Chevrolet dealers have 1 2019 listed between them. There's certainly only a handful of 2019 posters here (tbh, I wouldn't be surprised if there's more that lurk but are turned off from posting because of the reaction). There's very little anecdotal evidence to support your conjecture, I'm curious what you've seen that suggests these things are moving numbers?

I honestly don't see a point dunking on the 2019 front end now that people are driving/enjoying it, but it's equally asinine to pretend the design was a success or that if one doesn't find it aesthetically pleasing they're "haters" or have some sort of agenda.
lawguy85 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.