Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > Z/28 Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-26-2016, 11:58 PM   #15
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 c7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
I won't be surprised if they didn't make one at all.

I would be shocked if they put a LS motor into a 6th gen camaro.
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 01:35 PM   #16
lt4camaro


 
lt4camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 LT1 10 speed auto
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nataphen View Post
Nice thinking. AFM isn't available on manual transmission cars anyway, so that would be an easy upgrade for the Z/28. The stock LT1 cam is so mild that you could add a lot of power without even making the idle rougher.
AFM is on the C7 with the manual trans. Why wouldn't it be on the Camaro?.
lt4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 01:51 PM   #17
Eric SS
#becauseracecar
 
Eric SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by lt4camaro View Post
AFM is on the C7 with the manual trans. Why wouldn't it be on the Camaro?.
I don't know why it isn't but it isn't.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 07:59 PM   #18
fradaj

 
Drives: RS
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,037
Maybe a DI LS7 making about 580 HP, 580 ft/lb of torque?
fradaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 09:25 PM   #19
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric SS View Post
I don't know why it isn't but it isn't.
The Corvette has a steel torque tube between the engine and transmission to absorb the vibrations from AFM, when the engine changes to V4. The Camaro transmission bolts directly to the engine, so there is nothing to absorb the vibrations. On the auto trans, the vibrations are absorbed by the torque converter.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 09:42 PM   #20
Eric SS
#becauseracecar
 
Eric SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
The Corvette has a steel torque tube between the engine and transmission to absorb the vibrations from AFM, when the engine changes to V4. The Camaro transmission bolts directly to the engine, so there is nothing to absorb the vibrations. On the auto trans, the vibrations are absorbed by the torque converter.
TIL. Thanks.
Eric SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2016, 10:15 AM   #21
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
I've been battling with this over at The House of Z.

I think the LS7, regardless of how much I love that engine, is gone now. I gphad thought that GM would simply make a ZL1, light weighted, CC brakes and call it the Z/28. I'm more along the lines that GM will bump the LT1 to 500 similar to taking the LF3 and making the LF4 just for the ATS-V.

So either a light weight ZL1 or a 500 HP 1LE, and I'm leaning toward the latter right now. Mostly because I'm hoping the next Z/28 isn't a $75,000 car.
This pretty much sums up my thinking.

If they are going the N/A Route. I see something ala LS1 to LS6. A hot LT1 if you will. Just based on GM past history of sharing engines, I don't see them making a unique engine for the Camaro. Sorry, I just don't see it.

LSA = 5th Gen ZL1, previous CTS-V
LS7 First Z06, then Z/28
LS3 Camaro and Corvette
LT1, Camro and Corvette
LT4, Z06, ZL1 and CTS-V

The only GM vehicle to get a unique engine was the ZR1 with the LS9.

Also I see alot of people saying 550 or more N/A. It's getting a lot harder to do that N/A with emissions standards.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2016, 04:17 PM   #22
toehead93


 
Drives: 2014 2SS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: wpb fl
Posts: 3,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhobbs View Post
Based on some quick math, an engine using the 3.622 stroke of the LT1 could rev 7500+ rpm and still have the same piston speed as the LS7. Using the shorter ratio rocker arms, I wonder if they would be stable at those rpms.

I think the issue would be valve area and port flow to get enough air in the engine.
Although I doubt this will happen this was a good read regarding the de-stroked LS7. http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/vem...oke-of-genius/
__________________
Used Racing Brake 2 Peice Rotors for sale:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=344754

Summit White 2014 2SS 1LE
Recaros, NPP exhaust, Nav
2010 2SS A6 - sold.
toehead93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2016, 07:26 PM   #23
The Idiocracy
 
Drives: 2016 Black SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 234
I think we will see an LTx, NA, with CNC heads and special cam. Probably 550 hp/tq.
The Idiocracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2016, 07:37 PM   #24
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,417
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
This pretty much sums up my thinking.

If they are going the N/A Route. I see something ala LS1 to LS6. A hot LT1 if you will. Just based on GM past history of sharing engines, I don't see them making a unique engine for the Camaro. Sorry, I just don't see it.

LSA = 5th Gen ZL1, previous CTS-V
LS7 First Z06, then Z/28
LS3 Camaro and Corvette
LT1, Camro and Corvette
LT4, Z06, ZL1 and CTS-V

The only GM vehicle to get a unique engine was the ZR1 with the LS9.

Also I see alot of people saying 550 or more N/A. It's getting a lot harder to do that N/A with emissions standards.
I don't see a unique engine for the Z/28 either....

...Also, I don't think it will be an issue with how expensive or streetable the Z/28 will be...There are enough models including 1LE and ZL-1 to make everybody happy....The Z/28 will be for the track-rat-only buyer....I think it will have an LT-4 with weight, suspension (including tires and wheels), the kitchen sink, all for performance above the ZL-1 and GT-R....

The 1LE is a step up in performance from the SS with the same engine...The Z/28 will be a step up in performance from the ZL-1 with the same engine...

As expensive as it will be anyway, a unique z/28 engine can't be justified for the small amount that will be sold....

P.S. That monster rear wing shown in the spy-pics tells me the engine will be the highest hp and speed available (LT4) and it will be on the lightest weight Camaro (Z/28)....
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 08:14 AM   #25
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
I don't see a unique engine for the Z/28 either....

...Also, I don't think it will be an issue with how expensive or streetable the Z/28 will be...There are enough models including 1LE and ZL-1 to make everybody happy....The Z/28 will be for the track-rat-only buyer....I think it will have an LT-4 with weight, suspension (including tires and wheels), the kitchen sink, all for performance above the ZL-1 and GT-R....

The 1LE is a step up in performance from the SS with the same engine...The Z/28 will be a step up in performance from the ZL-1 with the same engine...

As expensive as it will be anyway, a unique z/28 engine can't be justified for the small amount that will be sold....

P.S. That monster rear wing shown in the spy-pics tells me the engine will be the highest hp and speed available (LT4) and it will be on the lightest weight Camaro (Z/28)....
See that I could see. Basically the Z/28 takes from the ZL1 and steps it up to insane.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 09:31 AM   #26
NASTY99Z28

 
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
Like I've said for months a 396 ltx variant would make silly power and have a hug powerband. Just think about what a 500hp/500lbft car weighing 50-75lbs less would do on the track. The Shelby twins would have no chance.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
NASTY99Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 10:58 AM   #27
OKC
 
Drives: Mercedes E350
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1
Z28 Power

How about raiding Cadillac one more time for the Twin Turbo V6 in the ATS, Use RS style Body, Hood Vents from corvette and Carbon Brakes with all the trick suspension and Interior of the ZL1, Light weight, think it would make an awesome track car.
OKC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2016, 11:09 AM   #28
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by OKC View Post
How about raiding Cadillac one more time for the Twin Turbo V6 in the ATS, Use RS style Body, Hood Vents from corvette and Carbon Brakes with all the trick suspension and Interior of the ZL1, Light weight, think it would make an awesome track car.
The LF4 in the ATS-V is only better by 9 hp. They might as well keep the LT1 and not have the development costs of adding the LF4.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.