Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2020, 07:09 PM   #1
Abubaca
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Jamestown NC
Posts: 447
Can someone explain the basics of our LT/direct inject fueling?

So while I AM looking at supercharging, with everything else in life right now, I dunno. May or may not happen. Still....reading about the fueling systems, I've found I'm a little out of the loop with the fuel systems on these cars. I'm very experienced with engines and fuel injection, and built and installed the 383 sbc in my Iroc and tuned the Holley HP system. I understand how the engine needs fuel, and the basics of how superchargers can really expose any fueling deficiencies. I keep reading about the high pressure and low pressure pumps, and of course I realize the LT's are direct inject engines. I'll admit I don't fully know all the hardware involved.



Any real quick rundown or links to info on our fuel systems would be appreciated.
Abubaca is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2020, 09:49 PM   #2
Trochoidal

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 1,656
When I purchased my car I also wanted to know more about fueling. This is what I read and it helped with understanding better. I saved the link in my “Procharger folder”.

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/unde...stem-swapping/
__________________
Roto-Fab w/sound tube delete, Katech ported TB, Pray IM, Velossa, DD side markers, DSX FF, UPR Catch can, Halo brace, My custom vent gauge pod

Originally Posted by arpad_m - “Aww, yet another oil thread with almost the same question in the OP“
Trochoidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2020, 09:54 PM   #3
Abubaca
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Jamestown NC
Posts: 447
Wow, that's awesome! Just was I was looking for!
Thanks!
Abubaca is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2020, 09:17 AM   #4
Juiced1
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2012 2SS CAMARO 45th
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 18,663
An easy break down is that there is an extra high side pump. Normal fuel systems operate around 58psi these days. Direct injection operates from 800-3000psi. This is what the high side pump is for. It is a cam driven pump that takes the standard fuel line and highly compresses everything.



The issue here is the high side pump can be limited and the aftermarket injectors are crazy expensive.
Juiced1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2020, 09:47 AM   #5
Abubaca
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Jamestown NC
Posts: 447
Thank you!
Abubaca is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2020, 10:01 AM   #6
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,793
This FI forum has a lot of good info shared over the years.

The short version is our fuel systems have a high and low side. High side has a mechanical cam driven pump that operates upwards of 2400psi for the LT1 pump and 3000psi for the LT4. The low side which consists of a standard in-tank pump runs around 50psi. We also have a computer module in our cars called the FSCM controller that controls the fueling on these pumps.

While our fueling systems are complex and fairly expensive, the stock LT1 fuel system will support about 575whp(dyno may vary) on 93. The Full LT4 fuel system from the Injectors, High and Low side is a popular upgrade and will support 750whp on 93 octane. The problem is our engines are too high of compression to reach 750whp on 93 octane. The octane wall on 93 is around 620whp(dyno may vary). So that opens up another can of worms. Most usually end up running meth to supplement octane and cooling because it's cost effective. E85 is also a good way to go but it limits the fuel system headroom substantially. However if you mix it down into the E50-60 range then you gain back a significant amount of fuel headroom and you can make more power without fuel pressure dropping. E60 is about the sweet spot for running Ethanol to achieve optimal timing and fuel system headroom on these engines.

This should get you headed the right direction, now I would start reading threads pertaining to fueling.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA

Last edited by KingLT1; 05-19-2020 at 10:18 AM.
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2020, 02:44 PM   #7
EDFHOBBIES
Dyno Show Queen LOL
 
EDFHOBBIES's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,345
Send a message via Skype™ to EDFHOBBIES
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
This FI forum has a lot of good info shared over the years.

The short version is our fuel systems have a high and low side. High side has a mechanical cam driven pump that operates upwards of 2400psi for the LT1 pump and 3000psi for the LT4. The low side which consists of a standard in-tank pump runs around 50psi. We also have a computer module in our cars called the FSCM controller that controls the fueling on these pumps.

While our fueling systems are complex and fairly expensive, the stock LT1 fuel system will support about 575whp(dyno may vary) on 93. The Full LT4 fuel system from the Injectors, High and Low side is a popular upgrade and will support 750whp on 93 octane. The problem is our engines are too high of compression to reach 750whp on 93 octane. The octane wall on 93 is around 620whp(dyno may vary). So that opens up another can of worms. Most usually end up running meth to supplement octane and cooling because it's cost effective. E85 is also a good way to go but it limits the fuel system headroom substantially. However if you mix it down into the E50-60 range then you gain back a significant amount of fuel headroom and you can make more power without fuel pressure dropping. E60 is about the sweet spot for running Ethanol to achieve optimal timing and fuel system headroom on these engines.

This should get you headed the right direction, now I would start reading threads pertaining to fueling.

Spot on...

This is why I tell people to put a PD on an SS vs a centri they will all max out the octane and fuel long before some jerk off says a centri creates less heat.. Most shop will agree the pd makes for a better driving car if not going all out.. now if this was a LS setup with fore pump and ID1300s plus then hell yall centri time!
__________________


Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber
EDFHOBBIES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2020, 07:41 AM   #8
TJay74


 
Drives: 17 Camaro SS 1LE & 16 Sierra AT CC
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDFHOBBIES View Post
Spot on...

This is why I tell people to put a PD on an SS vs a centri they will all max out the octane and fuel long before some jerk off says a centri creates less heat.. Most shop will agree the pd makes for a better driving car if not going all out.. now if this was a LS setup with fore pump and ID1300s plus then hell yall centri time!

Honestly it depends on the driving experience you are after as well. Knowing what I know now, I wish I had went the PD route over the Procharger Centri route. There are pro's and con's to both systems.

The centri drives like a stock N/A car until you get into the throttle, then after around 4k RPM it turns into an animal. The downside is the centri does require some modifications to the airflow system in the front of the cars, that is where had I known that I would have went the Whipple route.
__________________
2019 Corvette Z06 2LZ A8 - Halltech CAI, AWE non-catted X-pipe, Mamo V2 ported TB 592rwhp, bone stock 566rwhp

2017 Camaro SS 1LE - Procharger D1SC w/ Tial 2" BOV & Race intercooler / ARH full length catless headers / Alky meth injection system - 650rwhp on conservative tune SOLD
TJay74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2020, 07:50 AM   #9
Glen e
Retired from Car mfrs....
 
Glen e's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT RS/HR-V
Join Date: May 2013
Location: /Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 10,048
To continue the “DI for dummies“ discussion:

I understand that now it’s under a lot more pressure, why do that?

Is it because it needs more pressure to enter the cylinder versus the manifold? What’s the end benefit to the consumer?

I was under the impression that DI was an advancement because the Injection mixture could be better timed…True/false?
Glen e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2020, 10:36 AM   #10
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,793
That is true. The window to inject fuel is much narrower but also much more efficient. It also aids in cooling which allows more compression with the same octane fuel compared to PI.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2020, 12:53 PM   #11
JeffFox
 
Drives: 2018 2SS Coupe A8
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Menomonee Falls WI
Posts: 213
Great Thread

and links. Thank you.
JeffFox is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.