Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2017, 11:18 AM   #1
11bravoss
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 194
Pretty butt hurt

so finally got my car tuned and I'm pretty disappointed with low numbers, not too sure of what to think of it. After the tune the AFR(11.9-12.2) was good and my IAT's were low. I feel like something is wrong and not sure where to look, but I'm almost to the point of just turning the car back to stock and just selling everything. Anyways heres my mod list and graph, I know people with similar mods are well over 600. Granted my tune was done on a mustang dyno, it would still only be around 550 on a dyno jet which still seems low.

P1 procharger
3.85 pulley holding 8psi
CA test pipes
borla mid and x pipe
flowmaster outlaws
snow performance meth kit

[IMG][/IMG]
11bravoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 11:28 AM   #2
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
I would expect more like 550 on a mustang.

Do you know how much timing you are seeing?
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 11:38 AM   #3
11bravoss
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 194
If I remember correctly it was around 13 or 14
11bravoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 11:55 AM   #4
JoeAyalaM
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Audi S6 V8TT, Volvos XC60 & S60R
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: 5000 ft above sea level.
Posts: 414
100% Meth?

Should be more. Looks like a poor tune. You should make some Datalogs and have them reviewed by an expert.
JoeAyalaM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 11:57 AM   #5
lcarney1977
 
Drives: 2016 CAMARO SS
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: mass
Posts: 210
im making 565rwhp on a loaded mustang dyno .. i have a D-1 procharger and headers only, if i add meth i should see 600-620rwhp.
lcarney1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 11:58 AM   #6
11bravoss
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 194
Meth was 50/50. I'll have to see if I can datalog with my SCT
11bravoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 12:34 PM   #7
Ian SS

 
Ian SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS, 2017 JKU Wrangler
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 876
Did you get a baseline on this same dyno?

Remember it is just a tool. If you don't have a baseline you really don't have a comparison. That being said, that seems low. How does the car drive?
__________________
SLO 1SS - sold
1SS MRC NPP 6MT

2018 Ram Rebel 4x4 5.7
Ian SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 01:14 PM   #8
SSDan

 
SSDan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS 6MT NPP
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lake Murray, SC
Posts: 2,245
I know we are likely to throw out thoughts on things you already know so with that in mind - what gear was this pull done in? Was it 4th gear if a M6 or 6th gear if a A8? Those are the gears that give 1-1 ratios and thus the best for talking about and comparing dyno numbers.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS Hyper Blue 6MT NPP

2010 Camaro 2SS Cam/Headers/CAI/3.91 gears
476 rwhp/440 rwtq (sold)
SSDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 04:46 PM   #9
MR 45TH

 
MR 45TH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 1,138
Definitely looks low. As stated the dyno is just a tool. Is that the corrected number?
__________________
2018 ZL1…Many mods to come
MR 45TH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 05:59 PM   #10
Atomic Ed

 
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
I know several of you are reminding us all that a dyno is just a comparison tool, but IMHO, this low of a number is just too much to discount as dyno variance. Yes a 50 rwhp difference is easily seen between dynos, but 11bravoss is somewhere around 75-150 rwhp short....that's either something on the build, or a dyno really out of whack.

Here are the PIDS I think you should data log on a full pull:

1. Timing advance (cylinder 1)
2. Command (Air Fuel) Ratio
3. Short Term Knock Retard
4. Intake Air Temperature
5. Manifold air pressure
6. Barometric Pressure OBDII
7. Engine RPM

I'm sure the Procharger guy will chime in also. At least contact them.
Atomic Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 06:11 PM   #11
Stefano
 
Stefano's Avatar
 
Drives: 6th Gen NicKey Camaro & others.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Loves Park, Illinois
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian SS View Post
Did you get a baseline on this same dyno?

Remember it is just a tool. If you don't have a baseline you really don't have a comparison. That being said, that seems low. How does the car drive?
You need to baseline your car before any mods so that you can measure the increase after the mods as well as have other data for comparison.

What does the individual who tuned it, have to say about the results?
Stefano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 07:33 PM   #12
11bravoss
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 194
they never did a baseline because they immediately installed the Baro breakout kit and and threw off the MAF so they had to do a base tune just to roll the car onto the rollers. The car has even power through out the pulls, but the odd thing is before the tune tires would easily break lose from the can tune from procharger with the stock 3.9 pulley and no meth, now in first I can hit and the tires don't even really break lose. not sure if its just because of the more even powerband or loss of power from the tune. Car is a M6 and all the pulls were done in 4th.
11bravoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 07:34 PM   #13
11bravoss
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic Ed View Post
I know several of you are reminding us all that a dyno is just a comparison tool, but IMHO, this low of a number is just too much to discount as dyno variance. Yes a 50 rwhp difference is easily seen between dynos, but 11bravoss is somewhere around 75-150 rwhp short....that's either something on the build, or a dyno really out of whack.

Here are the PIDS I think you should data log on a full pull:

1. Timing advance (cylinder 1)
2. Command (Air Fuel) Ratio
3. Short Term Knock Retard
4. Intake Air Temperature
5. Manifold air pressure
6. Barometric Pressure OBDII
7. Engine RPM

I'm sure the Procharger guy will chime in also. At least contact them.
do you know if I can datalog these with my sct x4?
11bravoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 07:36 PM   #14
11bravoss
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefano View Post
You need to baseline your car before any mods so that you can measure the increase after the mods as well as have other data for comparison.

What does the individual who tuned it, have to say about the results?
he didn't really say much and kept saying its because of his dyno, but my ass dyno wasn't impressed either
11bravoss is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.