Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2018, 10:34 AM   #1
Blazin383
 
Blazin383's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Richland WA
Posts: 451
Disappionting Day at the Drag Strip

So I finally got a chance to get a couple runs in at the drag strip and it was very disappointing to say the least. Ended up only getting to run twice because it was a series event so there were a million race cars there and I had to enter the Sportsman class to even get to run. Anyway, I was there mostly to get a couple runs against my friend and his bolt on 14 Audi RS5.
Our first run was against each other and it was pathetic. FYI, bone stock 16 2SS A8, letting the trans do it's own shifting.

It was a prepped track, so I figured traction would be much better than runs I've done on the street. I ran in Track mode and left the TC on figuring the car would find all the available grip. It has been many years since I've run a car on a busy track so I was actually a little nervous and of course when you put a helmet on it changes the entire environment in the car. All that being said, my reaction time wasn't great at .266. I could feel the TC struggling for grip and the 60' rolled by in a leisurely 2.305. Obviously the rest of the run suffered from there with the 330' @ 6.111, 1/8th mile at 8.948 @ 87.77 mph, and the 1000' at 11.344, with the 1/4 rolling by at 13.345 @ 112.26.

In contrast to that, my friend whipped me with a .043 RT, 2.008 60', 330 @ 5.704, 1/8th @ 8.658 @ 83.97, 1000 ft @ 11.178, and the 1/4 @ 13.297 @ 106.93, beating me by .048. Had I had just a little more track I could have run him down, but no such luck.

Anyway, my second run I decided I'd see if Launch Control would get me out of the hole better. Unfortunately, Launch Control didn't help. I actually had a worse run with the LC on. Run #2 with LC:
Reaction time .053, 60' 2.447, 330' @6.182, 1/8 @ 9.018 and 88.01 mph, 1000' was 11.413, 1/4 13.419 @ 112.34.

All in all very disappointing! One thing I discovered after the runs is that when the dealership changed my oil the previous day, they had inflated the tires to 37 psi. I'm sure that didn't help with grip, but certainly shouldn't have cause the poor launch. I guess the bottom line is I just need some more time at the track to figure out how to get her down the track quickly.

Worst thing is that I let my buddy steal the crown I've held for 25 years!! Ugh! Odd thing is I've run him on the road many times and from a standing start he'd jump out a couple cars but I'd always roll by him pretty quickly and it seemed like Track mode and traction control left on resulted in little drama and quick starts. I would have thought the grip of a prepped track would have been better not worse.
Blazin383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 10:55 AM   #2
jdasnt3

 
jdasnt3's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Silverado 1500
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,721
Your car is running just fine. It's all about the launch and practice with this car. The 37PSI in the tires DEFINITELY didn't help. Try lowering the rears to 22 or 20 PSI, then drive around the water box (if allowed) and then do a quick chirp and clean the tires off for a burnout. 2.3 60' times were the reasons for your slow 1/4, but that trap speed shows that your car is very capable of a low 12 second pass. A 1.8 60' or 1.9 will get you into the low 12's and it has been done tons of times on stock tires, just not at 37 PSI.
__________________
16 Red Hot 2SS A8: NPP, CAI Cold air, Ported TB, Fasterproms Ported intake, E85 flex, Formatto tuned. 11.80@118 with 1.92 60' (600-700 DA) on stock run flats.
jdasnt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 11:19 AM   #3
z28pat

 
z28pat's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 z28, 2018 2ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Parrish, Florida
Posts: 835
The best indicator of the car's performance is the mph, at 112+ the car seems to be doing fine. Work on the launch, get that 60' down to 2 seconds or less and you'll be well in the 12s.
z28pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 11:20 AM   #4
Blazin383
 
Blazin383's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Richland WA
Posts: 451
Yeah, I knew when I discovered the tire pressure that it certainly didn't help matters. Not sure what the dealership was thinking pumping them up to 37 psi!
I did drive around the water box, and did a quick cleaning of the tires before staging. Oh well, next time!
Blazin383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 02:30 PM   #5
zr1chris

 
zr1chris's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1SS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Port Saint Lucie FL
Posts: 1,224
Gotta get that launch down. Almost every time I see someone getting bad times it's due to a bad 60'. A 2.3 is beyond bad. Gotta try to get it under 2.1 which should be possible on stock tires. A pair of drag radials should get you a 1.8 which will make a world of difference in your total ET
zr1chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 03:32 PM   #6
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
I have found that launch control is best on an unprepped street surface and works poorly on a prepped dragstrip. My car is an M6 though.

I would definitely run with TC off -- I usually double click it to Competitive Mode (TC off, Track version of stability control on). I've found TC on to be very conservative and pulls back power too quickly.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1SS, M6, Hurst shifter, Hyper Blue, NPP, Gray Split Spoke Wheels

Best 1/4 Mile: 12.24 @ 115.9 mph
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 06:37 PM   #7
lt4camaro


 
lt4camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 LT1 10 speed auto
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
Here are some suggestions, lower rear tire pressure to 25psi, back into the water (shut off trac control and stability control hold the button down 10 seconds or more) pull out of the water and do a good burnout standing still till some smoke comes from the tires, stage the car and do not think about reaction time, leave when you are ready. Take off as hard as you can without spinning (modulate throttle to control wheel spin by the seat of your pants) you will feel the bite and get the gas to floor hard. With a auto trans you should be knocking down 1.9 60 ft times all day long and running low 12's @ 114mph. Make sure you have been using 93 octane weeks before you try it again and run with a full tank if you have spin issues. And when you stage, just barely turn on the 2nd light, if you go to far just back up and trip the light again very easy. A good rollout is worth .2 ( just touching the 2nd light) Your there to get a good ET, reaction time means nothing so let the other guy go and leave when your ready.

If you do a proper burn out, with 25 psi pressure (warm) full tank of fuel, on a decent prepped track, you should be able to launch from idle and mashing the throttle when your ready and that will flash the converter for a nice launch. Remember, shut off traction control and stability control so you can do a burn out (hold it with the brake) and leave it off. The 455 HP SS doesn't really have enough to get you in trouble on a prepped track and a prepped car.
lt4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 07:12 PM   #8
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28pat View Post
The best indicator of the car's performance is the mph, at 112+ the car seems to be doing fine. Work on the launch, get that 60' down to 2 seconds or less and you'll be well in the 12s.
Yep, this.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 07:24 PM   #9
lt4camaro


 
lt4camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 LT1 10 speed auto
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28pat View Post
The best indicator of the car's performance is the mph, at 112+ the car seems to be doing fine. Work on the launch, get that 60' down to 2 seconds or less and you'll be well in the 12s.
What your saying is truthfull, but 112 trap speed is on the weak side. The car should be trapping 114mph. Another thing regarding trap speed is during a poor launch and a poor 60 ft due to excessive spinning can a lot of times result in a higher MPH trap and poor ET versus a perfect no spin hard launch and a all grip run thru 1000 feet which a lot of time results in a lower MPH trap but much better ET. ET wins races, not trap speed.
lt4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 08:46 PM   #10
Martinjlm
Retired from GM
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtirocz View Post
I have found that launch control is best on an unprepped street surface and works poorly on a prepped dragstrip. My car is an M6 though.

I would definitely run with TC off -- I usually double click it to Competitive Mode (TC off, Track version of stability control on). I've found TC on to be very conservative and pulls back power too quickly.
Yeah, that’s what I’ve found to work best for me too.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lt4camaro View Post
What your saying is truthfull, but 112 trap speed is on the weak side. The car should be trapping 114mph. Another thing regarding trap speed is during a poor launch and a poor 60 ft due to excessive spinning can a lot of times result in a higher MPH trap and poor ET versus a perfect no spin hard launch and a all grip run thru 1000 feet which a lot of time results in a lower MPH trap but much better ET. ET wins races, not trap speed.
Interesting. I haven’t really figured out the correlation between trap speed and quarter time. When I ran my vert at Milan, my best time was 12.837 @ 108 mph. My highest trap speed was 109 and that was on my two highest quarter times...12.9 something and 13.1 something. I assumed the slightly higher trap was because of the longer duration on the track, even though only a couple tenths of a second.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 09:24 PM   #11
protovack

 
Drives: 2019 2LT 2.0T M6 Riverside Blue
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: WA
Posts: 847
I would actually expect a tuned RS5 with bolt ons to beat a stock SS. You guys were still super close, I would say within the margin of driver error. You are being pretty dramatic about the difference there, or perhaps fishing? I'd call it a draw at a 13.3 to a 13.3. Not what I would call a "pathetic" showing. Also, someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but to see the true potential of your car you would need to run in a PTM mode. I believe on just regular track mode, the traction control still rules, and it messes up your launch.
protovack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2018, 10:32 PM   #12
Snowblind

 
Snowblind's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
Buy some drag radials

Look for the "Dragstrip and Launching" section on this forum and grab some popcorn, you'll learn a bunch and then proceed to get your crown back.
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
Snowblind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2018, 07:52 AM   #13
Blazin383
 
Blazin383's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Richland WA
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by protovack View Post
I would actually expect a tuned RS5 with bolt ons to beat a stock SS. You guys were still super close, I would say within the margin of driver error. You are being pretty dramatic about the difference there, or perhaps fishing? I'd call it a draw at a 13.3 to a 13.3. Not what I would call a "pathetic" showing. Also, someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but to see the true potential of your car you would need to run in a PTM mode. I believe on just regular track mode, the traction control still rules, and it messes up your launch.
Not sure what you mean by “fishing”, but his Audi has Cold air intakes, exhaust, reprogrammed engine and reprogrammed transmission, as well as he took a 5 gallon can of high octane fuel (not sure what it was exactly, he was secretive about it), but I’ve run him on the road several times and walked him easily from anything but a standing start. From a dig his all wheel drive gave him the jump by a couple cars, but I had no problem pulling by him. The launch control on his car is programmed to launch at 6,000 rpm which along with his all wheel drive gives him a serious advantage for the first 60’ at least. If I’d have dropped my tire pressure and had a couple more runs to practice I think I’d have beat him. He got 3 runs to my two and had a best of 12.97 @107.
Blazin383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2018, 08:07 AM   #14
jdasnt3

 
jdasnt3's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Silverado 1500
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by lt4camaro View Post
What your saying is truthfull, but 112 trap speed is on the weak side. The car should be trapping 114mph. Another thing regarding trap speed is during a poor launch and a poor 60 ft due to excessive spinning can a lot of times result in a higher MPH trap and poor ET versus a perfect no spin hard launch and a all grip run thru 1000 feet which a lot of time results in a lower MPH trap but much better ET. ET wins races, not trap speed.
A hot day and a high DA will definitely keep this car "on the low side," so not all 6th gens will trap 114 at every track and condition. For example, most stock 6th gens trap about 111 to 112 at Bradenton Motorsports in the heat even though we have an elevation of 12 feet. Our density altitude is typically 3000 plus during the hot days and nights here.
__________________
16 Red Hot 2SS A8: NPP, CAI Cold air, Ported TB, Fasterproms Ported intake, E85 flex, Formatto tuned. 11.80@118 with 1.92 60' (600-700 DA) on stock run flats.
jdasnt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.