Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > I4 Turbo LTG Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2019, 09:17 PM   #1
Josh42089
 
Drives: 19 Chevy Camaro LTa
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Ontario
Posts: 49
Exhaust mod, lower torque? 19 Lt 8 speed

Have 19 Lt auto. Got rid of the suitcase muffler and put dual magnaflow performance straight through glass packs. 3". Didnt notice it with stock setup but now it feels like when I want to get some quick acceleration that it's bogged down initially. Everything is stock except this. 3" to the y then 2.5 to the mufflers and tips. Anyone else notice that? Is there a way to remedy this or maybe I'm over thinking it. The car when crusing likes to run around 1000 to maybe 1200rpm when at a constant speed in the city.
Josh42089 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 09:48 PM   #2
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
Is the LT the V6 version? Dual 3” piping would be overkill for a stock V6 for sure. The bigger size will have a penalty on exhaust velocity, so a little drop in the low end torque wouldn’t surprise me.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 09:52 PM   #3
Josh42089
 
Drives: 19 Chevy Camaro LTa
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Ontario
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
Is the LT the V6 version? Dual 3” piping would be overkill for a stock V6 for sure. The bigger size will have a penalty on exhaust velocity, so a little drop in the low end torque wouldn’t surprise me.
No the Lt is the is 4 cyl turbo. Just the glass packs are 3". But from the header back is stock 3" to the y pipe then to 2.5.
Josh42089 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 09:53 PM   #4
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh42089 View Post
No the Lt is the is 4 cyl turbo. Just the glass packs are 3". But from the header back is stock 3" to the y pipe then to 2.5.
Ok, so stock is 2.5” to each muffler which you moved up to 3”, right?
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2019, 09:59 PM   #5
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Shouldn't have affected anything in a way that would cause it to bog down.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2019, 09:40 AM   #6
turbojeep95
 
turbojeep95's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 Camaro lt, 22 Camaro LT1
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 411
What your noticing the loss of torque at lower rpm's due to the loss of back-pressure from your exhaust modification. I put an exhaust cutout on my car after the down pipe and when running it open, makes a slight drop in performance in the lower rpm range. (torque comes on 200rpm later) Had it dyno'd and the graph verifies the change. Overall, torque output remains relatively the same and horse power will increase slightly at higher rpm's.

turbojeep95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2019, 01:36 PM   #7
dekes1
 
Drives: Camaro like
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbojeep95 View Post
What your noticing the loss of torque at lower rpm's due to the loss of back-pressure from your exhaust modification. I put an exhaust cutout on my car after the down pipe and when running it open, makes a slight drop in performance in the lower rpm range. (torque comes on 200rpm later) Had it dyno'd and the graph verifies the change. Overall, torque output remains relatively the same and horse power will increase slightly at higher rpm's.

I know this is one of those car tuning topics that everyone debates, but there's no such thing as exhaust backpressure. What is really in play is the exhaust gas velocity and the scavenging effects of the exiting gas during each exhaust pulse. Exiting gas helps pull in fresh intake air as well as pull out spent exhaust gas.
A larger pipe results in lower velocity which decreases scavenging. End result is lower torque on the low end. But, with a turbo motor, these effects become very minimal since there is a positive charge on the incoming intake air which itself pushes out the exhaust gas. On a turbo motor, one of the best things you can do is open up the exhaust as close to the turbo as possible.
dekes1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2019, 03:16 PM   #8
Josh42089
 
Drives: 19 Chevy Camaro LTa
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Ontario
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
I know this is one of those car tuning topics that everyone debates, but there's no such thing as exhaust backpressure. What is really in play is the exhaust gas velocity and the scavenging effects of the exiting gas during each exhaust pulse. Exiting gas helps pull in fresh intake air as well as pull out spent exhaust gas.
A larger pipe results in lower velocity which decreases scavenging. End result is lower torque on the low end. But, with a turbo motor, these effects become very minimal since there is a positive charge on the incoming intake air which itself pushes out the exhaust gas. On a turbo motor, one of the best things you can do is open up the exhaust as close to the turbo as possible.
So what should I do to help with the exhaust mod?hi flow dp or catless, Add an intake for more air? Will all these mods have a balancing affect without having a tune?
Josh42089 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2019, 03:58 PM   #9
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
I know this is one of those car tuning topics that everyone debates, but there's no such thing as exhaust backpressure. What is really in play is the exhaust gas velocity and the scavenging effects of the exiting gas during each exhaust pulse. Exiting gas helps pull in fresh intake air as well as pull out spent exhaust gas.
A larger pipe results in lower velocity which decreases scavenging. End result is lower torque on the low end. But, with a turbo motor, these effects become very minimal since there is a positive charge on the incoming intake air which itself pushes out the exhaust gas. On a turbo motor, one of the best things you can do is open up the exhaust as close to the turbo as possible.
This. Well said.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2019, 04:29 PM   #10
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh42089 View Post
So what should I do to help with the exhaust mod?hi flow dp or catless, Add an intake for more air? Will all these mods have a balancing affect without having a tune?
You can run all of them without a tune just fine. I did for about just over 16k miles zero issues before i got tuned and zero issues since except a defect part that the manufacturer made good on. You won't need a tune until you choose to tune or get anything more done then the basic bolt-ons you already mentioned
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2019, 06:21 PM   #11
Josh42089
 
Drives: 19 Chevy Camaro LTa
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Ontario
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
You can run all of them without a tune just fine. I did for about just over 16k miles zero issues before i got tuned and zero issues since except a defect part that the manufacturer made good on. You won't need a tune until you choose to tune or get anything more done then the basic bolt-ons you already mentioned
Which tune is most popular/dependable..zzp or Vermont are the ones I've been reading about. Also for the dp id prob go Zzp. Any problems or codes being thrown on these whether hi flow or catless.
Josh42089 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2019, 07:13 PM   #12
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh42089 View Post
Which tune is most popular/dependable..zzp or Vermont are the ones I've been reading about. Also for the dp id prob go Zzp. Any problems or codes being thrown on these whether hi flow or catless.
I can't speak for Vermont directly but they are lightyears ahead of what ZZP will give you. Honestly get your own MPVI2 device a cheap $200 laptop and reach oit to vermont tuning. I don't dislike ZZP itself and they will tune you safely same as anyone else cept RPM but the way they make power in a canned tune will limit your power gains. My best advice is find a local dyno tuner or make a trip to vermont tuning they are in northern vermont not far from the Canadian border.

You won't get any codes unless things are installed incorrectly. I installed mine september 2016 drove the shit out of my camaro til i got tuned in late april 2017 and as i said previously zero problems.

Be prepared to invest money in your tune 2017+ is expensive af especially if your an A8.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.