03-30-2015, 05:30 PM | #127 |
ultracrepidarianism
Drives: '14 1SS/RS/1LE/NPP '18 Accord Sport Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: where folks drive like shit
Posts: 1,297
|
apparently I expect too much. 400 - 500lbs would be awesome. 200lbs is just one less passenger.
__________________
|
03-30-2015, 05:33 PM | #128 |
Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
|
The LT-1 weighs what, about 20 lbs more than a LS3? But the gen6 has tubular shorty headers which are probably, 15-20lbs lighter than LS3 and C7 LT-1 cast iron manifolds. So I don't think the camaro will gain weight just on the LS3 to LT-1 change.
|
03-30-2015, 05:34 PM | #129 | |
Drives: RS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
Composites can be stronger and lighter, in some cases they are also more expensive. I was thinking just the opposite, maybe the 1LE or Z/28 would get the composite components. |
|
03-30-2015, 05:41 PM | #130 | |
|
Quote:
Can you name an example where something has happened like that? More often than now it's emissions/safety that keep us from getting more performance parts, but that's what the aftermarket is for. The stuff you don't value is often what the average buyer is looking for, and without them the price of the car would skyrocket or the car not exist at all. So those "loud crybabies" are probably the reason we get cars like the ZL1 and Z/28, since they can sell enough to "Paul" and the like to cover the cost for R&D. The bottom line is if they built cars for just people who just want pure performance, we wouldn't have a Camaro. Remember the 4th Gen!
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
03-30-2015, 06:09 PM | #131 |
Drives: 2014 AGM 2SS/RS 1LE Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 38
|
So I am about 1 year into my '14 1LE. Use it as a daily driver and drove it through the winter with all seasons (except snow days). I still ask myself how is it possible that I am as or more excited about this car than the day that I signed the papers and drove it off the lot. What is it about these cars (including top mustang and challenger models) that stirs passions?
I loved the 5th gen when I saw the concept and even more when i saw it in person. I test drove it a couple of times and knew it was a matter of when and not if. I am not mechanically inclined and can do no serious modding alone. I am not expert in cold air induction, tri-y's, long tubes, headers, coil overs, etc. but I do know that this car makes me feel like a kid again and makes me smile when I'm behind the wheel. I purchased my gen 5 when I knew gen 6 was on the way. It wasn't because I didn't think the Camaro team couldn't deliver on an improvement and evolution on gen 5 or that first MYs can be buggy but rather I just couldn't wait any longer. To convert me to this level of desire for this car is a testament to the Camaro team. I was down on US cars for a long time - avoiding them for nearly 15 years. You also have to credit these guys for doing what they did at a time when GM was on life support. Sorry for the diatribe but the excitement over the pieces of information we are getting about gen 6 just overtook me. I will be paying attention to every detail, seeking out pictures, reading reviews, seeing it in person, test driving and who knows one day purchasing a gen 6 1LE or other performance variant to stable along side my '14 1LE. It's a great time to be an enthusiast. |
03-30-2015, 06:13 PM | #132 |
Remember the Charleston 9
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
|
Good point.
__________________
BRING BACK THE B4C POLICE CAMARO!
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black |
03-30-2015, 06:13 PM | #133 | |
Drives: RS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
I am sure you could get a good trade for your 14 if you decide on getting a 6th gen. |
|
03-30-2015, 06:22 PM | #134 |
Drives: camaro Join Date: May 2013
Location: Stony Brook,NY
Posts: 1,756
|
Agreed. I was expecting 400 pounds. Thats a difference worth mentioning.
__________________
2016 2SS,A8,NAV,NPP,MAG Ride,Sunroof
Hyperblue/JetBlack |
03-30-2015, 06:24 PM | #135 |
ultracrepidarianism
Drives: '14 1SS/RS/1LE/NPP '18 Accord Sport Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: where folks drive like shit
Posts: 1,297
|
The ATS 2.5, 2.0T and 3.6 all weigh 3300 - 3400 range so I don't see why 3400 - 3500 is not possible....
__________________
|
03-30-2015, 06:29 PM | #136 |
Remember the Charleston 9
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
|
Just read any thread about 6th gen weight and you'll see. Pay particular attention to posts by well respected members that have explained in detail why there is no way in heck this car will way 400 lbs less. Cadillac uses premium lightweight materials that the average Camaro owner can't afford.
__________________
BRING BACK THE B4C POLICE CAMARO!
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black |
03-30-2015, 06:42 PM | #137 | |
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,173
|
Quote:
We know that adding the V8 and all it's necessary goodies add around 200 pounds to the Camaro today. What everyone has been doing is exactly what you did, assume that because a 2.0T ATS weighs 3,400 pounds that you should be able to get a 3,400 pound SS Camaro. Nope. That would require a significant amount of premium materials and drive the price higher resulting in lower volumes, resulting in 2003 all over again. No thank you. In today's market, 200 pounds is a big deal. Yes, I realize there is a small sample of people that want an engine, transmission, brakes and a steering wheel. That does not make a great car, though. In fact it would make a car that would be so s%&(ty that only a few would buy it. Think COPO volumes. A great car for the few that need that.......a crappy car for pretty much anyone that also likes to drive to work everyday, go on a weekend trip once in a while. There has to be the ability to provide the features that most people want in a car. I hate to remind you guys, but most Camaro owners don't even know this site exists...or any Camaro site for that matter. To most, it's a really nice car they enjoy owning and driving and as long as it's economical, the insurance premiums are decent and it is reliable, they'll keep driving it. But that's all it means to most buyers or lessees. No mods, no track days. Those are the bread and butter customers GM has to attract with this new car. It simply has to be a great car first, then a great Camaro. So the Camaro needs to be a simply awesome coupe. The V6 does in fact have to compete with not only the Mustang, but also Honda Accord Coupe. It just has to be better on so many levels that the minimalist crowd will be disappointed. My guess is they will be the only ones disappointed, because I am expecting some pretty great stuff coming our way. As for the safety stuff, well get ready for the mandates. Once you see statistics that cars with active safety features save lives, they will become mandatory. It's coming.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
03-30-2015, 06:49 PM | #138 |
If the 'nanny' features become a standard, please put them on a different fuse so I can pull it and drive my own car...
|
|
03-30-2015, 07:27 PM | #139 | |
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,173
|
Quote:
99% of drivers will be better for it. And I'm not a 1%er. Best example is ABS and traction control on superbikes. A few people in the world can manage a 2 wheel drift. The rest are better served with technology that helps manage the business when they get over their heads. Doesn't mean everyone wants it and that's ok.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
03-30-2015, 07:47 PM | #140 |
Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
I tell people all the time that self driving cars of the future are not that far away. And you can be mad if you want, but the drivers will be the dangers on the road. Not the computer controlled cars.
I am impressed by 200 lbs. In car terms today, that's impressive. Given this car will be better in every way compared to my beloved 1LE almost makes me want one. But I hate car payments so I can't wait to pay mine off. I challenge all of the naysayers to list a lighter car with better performance for the same price. Not a lighter car that seats 2. Not a lighter car that has 200 hp. Not a $100k car. Under $40k and performs better and weighs less. Take your time... I'll wait...
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|