12-13-2017, 10:09 PM | #71 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Merry Christmas and take care.
|
12-13-2017, 10:09 PM | #72 |
Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Heard Evan got the GT to 11.69
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
12-13-2017, 10:10 PM | #73 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:12 PM | #74 |
Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
12-13-2017, 10:16 PM | #75 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:21 PM | #76 |
Drives: 2014 Camaro SS, 2002 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 70
|
You to man and im not trying to argue with you, your opinion is just as important as mine. At the end of the day both cars were stock with pro drivers on prepped closed tracks. The mustang was faster. But whatever, who cares. Am I going to trade in my camaro’s now and get a mustang? No. What about you? Is that .3 seconds that big of a deal for you to trade in? No. I just give credit where credit is due. These 18 mustangs have been running very low 12’s and mid to high 11’s with light mods. It doesnt hurt me to say it. Theres facts, im not a messenger im just simply reading the info im finding and talking about it, this is a forum after all.
|
12-13-2017, 10:36 PM | #77 | |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
Other than that no .3 difference has been shown until they are tested same track and day. If you want to compare different tracks and days the Camaro is still faster. Another fact Have the mustang guys been trading in lately when the Camaro tests a half second faster same track and day? You stayed true through all the beatings over the years I’m sure. Even when the 4.6 was a second slower than an ls1 lol Let’s see what happens in a head to head. I think your manual is in trouble. The autos I’m not sure it’s toss up... |
|
12-13-2017, 10:40 PM | #78 | |
Drives: 2014 Camaro SS, 2002 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:49 PM | #79 |
Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
11.69 > 11.84 sorry
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
12-13-2017, 10:52 PM | #80 |
Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
The mustang still launches lazy so to run 11.69 stock it must have some crazy mph. Like 123+
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
12-13-2017, 10:53 PM | #81 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:54 PM | #82 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:57 PM | #83 |
Drives: 2014 Camaro SS, 2002 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 70
|
|
12-13-2017, 10:59 PM | #84 |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|