Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2020, 06:08 AM   #43
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2021 Red Hot ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gapplebees
Posts: 3,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6spdhyperblue View Post
Is that true? A very large cam better with a manual trans?
The drivability is easier with a manual since the trans won't require a loose converter and possibly TCM tuning to help with the drivability.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 09:43 AM   #44
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6spdhyperblue View Post
Is that true? A very large cam better with a manual trans?
Large cam is best suited for- Stalled Auto > Manual > Stock stall Auto. Honestly I wouldn't consider running a large cam on a stock stall NA car. A PD blower car will still have a fat torque curve either way and still run good. You just have to deal with some potential drive-ability issues such as pulling through the brakes from increased idle speed and bucking/surging from the stock trans tune forcing the converter to lock up in all gears at part throttle. Ideally when you Cam a automatic you run a loose converter that doesn't lock part throttle and that soaks up some of the cams erratic behavior at low speed tip in throttle range.

Either way there is no point to run a large cam on a blower car. You don't need the overlap to make power because you have a external air pump forcing the engine to breath. So why take the driveability hit for little performance gain? Aside from that most here talking about cams in ZL1's are not really large cams.


This is what I would run in a stock stall car...or at least something along this line maybe with less lift. The cam in vid is a LPE GT35 with 38% fuel lobe.

__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 10:01 AM   #45
Snowwolfe
 
Drives: CTV5 V Blackwing on order
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East TN
Posts: 431
Quote:
Originally Posted by CW3SF View Post
My last car was 750hp. My ZL1 feels slow. Can always use a few more hp on the backstretch at the track.

Not surprised at the elevation you live at.
__________________
2022 CT5 V Blackwing with A10
2021 GMC Denali pickup with 6.2 and A10
2017 Ford Expedition
Snowwolfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 10:20 AM   #46
Idaho2018GTPremium

 
Idaho2018GTPremium's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,209
OK another question: I've heard a few times now that the TCM is "torque based". If that is the case, how are FBO or more ZL1s running more power to the rear tires if the TCM won't allow more than a given amount of torque?
__________________
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
2022 GR Supra 3.0

Past:
2018 Mustang GT Premium w/ PP1, MR, and A10
2007 MazdaSpeed3
1995 Pontiac Trans Am
1987 Camaro Z28

Idaho2018GTPremium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 10:33 AM   #47
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2021 Red Hot ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gapplebees
Posts: 3,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
OK another question: I've heard a few times now that the TCM is "torque based". If that is the case, how are FBO or more ZL1s running more power to the rear tires if the TCM won't allow more than a given amount of torque?
I'm not a tuner, but from what I gather the ECM has torque tables that can be manipulated.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 10:42 AM   #48
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
OK another question: I've heard a few times now that the TCM is "torque based". If that is the case, how are FBO or more ZL1s running more power to the rear tires if the TCM won't allow more than a given amount of torque?
Yes the ECU is torque based but it can be adjusted to allow more torque and not close the throttle.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 10:47 AM   #49
danhr
BAMF SS
 
danhr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS A8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ford City, PA
Posts: 3,023
Send a message via AIM to danhr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
OK another question: I've heard a few times now that the TCM is "torque based". If that is the case, how are FBO or more ZL1s running more power to the rear tires if the TCM won't allow more than a given amount of torque?
your torque tables aren't exact representations of how much torque you are making. On previous years, you could increase the torque values. essentially when you press the pedal down, you are requesting xxx amount of torque. the ecm and tcm then go to work to give you that amount of torque. at least that's my understanding of it...… someone might chime in that knows more than me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
I'm not a tuner, but from what I gather the ECM has torque tables that can be manipulated.
the ecm torque tables have to match the tcm torque tables. if not, the car won't do anything. The TCM torque tables can't be changed.

"BuT YoU CaN Do AnYTHinG to A 2020+!!!!"
__________________
2016 1SS A8: FBO + Circle D + P1X + Meth + Tuned by Pray Performance

Stock Longblock

800 SAE rwhp. 9.4 @ 145 mph.
danhr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 10:50 AM   #50
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2021 Red Hot ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gapplebees
Posts: 3,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by danhr View Post

"BuT YoU CaN Do AnYTHinG to A 2020+!!!!"
Correct, except adjust the TCM for now. Otherwise, spot-on.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 11:26 AM   #51
danhr
BAMF SS
 
danhr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS A8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ford City, PA
Posts: 3,023
Send a message via AIM to danhr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
Correct, except adjust the TCM for now. Otherwise, spot-on.


__________________
2016 1SS A8: FBO + Circle D + P1X + Meth + Tuned by Pray Performance

Stock Longblock

800 SAE rwhp. 9.4 @ 145 mph.
danhr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 11:51 AM   #52
Idaho2018GTPremium

 
Idaho2018GTPremium's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by danhr View Post
your torque tables aren't exact representations of how much torque you are making. On previous years, you could increase the torque values. essentially when you press the pedal down, you are requesting xxx amount of torque. the ecm and tcm then go to work to give you that amount of torque. at least that's my understanding of it...… someone might chime in that knows more than me.



the ecm torque tables have to match the tcm torque tables. if not, the car won't do anything. The TCM torque tables can't be changed.

"BuT YoU CaN Do AnYTHinG to A 2020+!!!!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
Correct, except adjust the TCM for now. Otherwise, spot-on.
You both have strong opinions on this. One is basically saying you can't do anything because the TCM is locked out, while the other is saying you can do FBOs + heads + mild cam and adjust the torque tables in the ECM to compensate.

I don't know which to believe since both of you seem very confident - although I am inclined to believe the guy with a ZL1 over the guy with a supercharged SS.

Anyone else care to chime in that has a FBO+ ZL1 and what was done to their car to make sure the extra power can be used and not neutered by the TCM lockout?
__________________
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
2022 GR Supra 3.0

Past:
2018 Mustang GT Premium w/ PP1, MR, and A10
2007 MazdaSpeed3
1995 Pontiac Trans Am
1987 Camaro Z28

Idaho2018GTPremium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 12:00 PM   #53
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2021 Red Hot ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Gapplebees
Posts: 3,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
You both have strong opinions on this. One is basically saying you can't do anything because the TCM is locked out, while the other is saying you can do FBOs + heads + mild cam and adjust the torque tables in the ECM to compensate.

I don't know which to believe since both of you seem very confident - although I am inclined to believe the guy with a ZL1 over the guy with a supercharged SS.

Anyone else care to chime in that has a FBO+ ZL1 and what was done to their car to make sure the extra power can be used and not neutered by the TCM lockout?
You don't have to listen to us, call some top shops and ask around.

Call or E-mail Vengeance Racing, one of the top shops in the country for late model GM. They will explain your options.

When I asked about packages for my car, the first package they recommended was a stage IV package which includes a cam. I chose not to install a cam at this time and went with a stage III package but left the option on the table for next year. I literally asked them about 30 or more questions and they were always responsive and always gave honest answers. The most professional performance shop I've ever dealt with.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 12:10 PM   #54
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,559
Not sure how you define large and I'm also not sure about HPE cam specs but my 200 additional top-end HP come largely from a different cam design and 2# boost.

I believe as we increase boost we should leave stock behind and increase LSA, which keeps boost pressure from going out the exhaust during valve overlap. And we're going to want more duration and lift on the exhaust side when the exhaust valve finally opens.

My point is, I would think there's significant power to be had by changing only LT4 cam design.

I'm also 100% certain that past or present GM LT4 engineers have long ago answered all such questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Either way there is no point to run a large cam on a blower car.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 03:14 PM   #55
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Yes the ECU is torque based but it can be adjusted to allow more torque and not close the throttle.
As a bit of steam relief, heartfelt congratulations to King on his 4000th post, many-many of which have been extremely helpful and educational. Thank you very much, Sir
Attached Images
 
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2020, 04:31 PM   #56
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,559
Yes, King is extremely knowledgeable and particularly helpful to a guy like me who is new to the Gen 6 Camaro and LT4. He consistently shortens my rabbit trails.

Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
As a bit of steam relief, heartfelt congratulations to King on his 4000th post, many-many of which have been extremely helpful and educational. Thank you very much, Sir
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650.
100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O.
2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel.
4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes).
2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next.
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.