Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2018, 03:28 PM   #15
Cmax
 
Cmax's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS FIFTY convertible
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 366
Be kinda cool to have the big V8 hybrid in my GMC Yukon....
Cmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 03:58 PM   #16
18LTLoveIt

 
18LTLoveIt's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Hyper Blue LT RS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,474
Chevy Considering Dropping the V6, Proof

Hi,

I got an email from GM on my new car purchase, specific to engine choices. It was a survey and when it got to the engine choices there were 2 4 cylinder options and 3 8 cylinder options. I chose none of the above and the next screen asked me why. I stated, "V6 minimum, preferred". For my survey to matter I shaved 11 yrs off my age.

My hunch was right, Chevy wants to copy Ford & Honda ditching the V6 for 2018 is making them seriously considering dropping V6 Level.

It's a known fact that 4 cylinders have to work harder. Yes, they are more efficient, but if you want to keep a car 8-10 yrs a V6 is better in the long run.
18LTLoveIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 04:00 PM   #17
Rock-It Man
376 cubic inches of fun
 
Rock-It Man's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 4,029
A turbo 4 would be a great replacement for the NA V6, just not the current turbo 4.
Rock-It Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 04:01 PM   #18
Rock-It Man
376 cubic inches of fun
 
Rock-It Man's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 4,029
The hybrid 4 sounds good to me.
Rock-It Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 04:02 PM   #19
ItsChristianInHD

 
ItsChristianInHD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2LT RS 3.6L
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Orange Park, Florida
Posts: 1,313
Personally not a fan of this. Mustang’s V6s didn’t have much sound to make them awesome. The current Camaro V6 Stock And NPP sounds beautiful.
ItsChristianInHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 04:12 PM   #20
ChickenPoop
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2019 Plum Crazy Scat Pack Charger
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: South Ga.
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock-It Man View Post
The hybrid 4 sounds good to me.
In a Civic maybe.
ChickenPoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 05:25 PM   #21
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18LTLoveIt View Post
Hi,

I got an email from GM on my new car purchase, specific to engine choices. It was a survey and when it got to the engine choices there were 2 4 cylinder options and 3 8 cylinder options. I chose none of the above and the next screen asked me why. I stated, "V6 minimum, preferred". For my survey to matter I shaved 11 yrs off my age.

My hunch was right, Chevy wants to copy Ford & Honda ditching the V6 for 2018 is making them seriously considering dropping V6 Level.

It's a known fact that 4 cylinders have to work harder. Yes, they are more efficient, but if you want to keep a car 8-10 yrs a V6 is better in the long run.
Both pass the same rigorous validation testing.

Also I'm not clear on how this is "copying". GM eliminated the V6 in the Malibu, the Regal, the Eqinox and Terrain. You have to get a GS if you want a V6. And GM will "LEAD" in being the first to offer a 4 cylinder in the Full Size Pickup.

It's all about FE.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley

Last edited by Number 3; 08-18-2018 at 05:41 PM.
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 05:25 PM   #22
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,796
The 3.6 is a pretty solid motor. I say ditch the 4 cylinder and keep the V6 and V8.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 05:49 PM   #23
NYJets12

 
NYJets12's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 1LT Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 781
4’s are junk no matter what brand of car it is , after 2-3 years they can’t make it up a mountain unless you start out at 70 by the time you hit the top of the mountain your doing 40
NYJets12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 05:55 PM   #24
MrRuss
 
MrRuss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 207
I know for others there is a place for a V6 muscle car (or 4cyl), I would not want one without a V8.
__________________
Mr Russ

Tim "the tool man" Taylor is my hero

My Garage:
'16 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS, Summit White, Adrenaline Red
-- Rotofab CAI, Soler TB, 1 7/8 coated LT's, Full 3" mids, 3" Stainless Works NPP mufflers, Flex Fuel, E85/91 tuned
'20 Honda Oddysey Elite 25th Anniversary Edition
--wifes car, she said "No more SUV's" after the 2 CX-9's totaled
MrRuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 05:58 PM   #25
Artos

 
Artos's Avatar
 
Drives: A10 LT4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Deep South TX
Posts: 1,094
Wonder What the 3rd V8 option you could chose...the 5.3?? Maybe it would be a viable choice for some V6 buyers.
Artos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 05:59 PM   #26
Corvette_Mike
 
Corvette_Mike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Ca.
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRuss View Post
I know for others there is a place for a V6 muscle car (or 4cyl), I would not want one without a V8.
Me too
Corvette_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 06:04 PM   #27
MrRuss
 
MrRuss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYJets12 View Post
4’s are junk no matter what brand of car it is , after 2-3 years they can’t make it up a mountain unless you start out at 70 by the time you hit the top of the mountain your doing 40
NA 4's maybe but the newest generation of turbo 4's are quite powerful. My wife drives a "18 Mazda CX-9, > 6K lbs, 3-row, mid-size SUV with a 2.5 Turbo 4. That thing hauls a$$, not like my SS but unexpectedly quick. We drove a Pilot and Highlander and it felt quicker to me.

It's actually her second one, we got the first new model in 2016 but it was totaled in an accident. We liked it so much we promptly got another one, same trim, color, etc...
__________________
Mr Russ

Tim "the tool man" Taylor is my hero

My Garage:
'16 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS, Summit White, Adrenaline Red
-- Rotofab CAI, Soler TB, 1 7/8 coated LT's, Full 3" mids, 3" Stainless Works NPP mufflers, Flex Fuel, E85/91 tuned
'20 Honda Oddysey Elite 25th Anniversary Edition
--wifes car, she said "No more SUV's" after the 2 CX-9's totaled
MrRuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2018, 06:16 PM   #28
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYJets12 View Post
4’s are junk no matter what brand of car it is , after 2-3 years they can’t make it up a mountain unless you start out at 70 by the time you hit the top of the mountain your doing 40
That would make the 2.0t we've had in our last 2 ATSs one of a kind then. Very glad we were so lucky!!! Can't believe our good fortune.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.